• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高危黑人个体对肺癌筛查的认知与信念:一种定性研究方法

Knowledge and beliefs about lung cancer screening among Black individuals at high risk: a qualitative approach.

作者信息

Gudina Abdi T, Kamen Charles, Mattick Lindsey J, Cartujano-Barrera Francisco, Janelsins Michelle C, Ossip Deborah, Rivera M Patricia, Fiscella Kevin, Cupertino Ana-Paula

机构信息

Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.

Division of Supportive Care in Cancer, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.

出版信息

Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2024 Aug 31;13(8):1877-1887. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-24-269. Epub 2024 Aug 12.

DOI:10.21037/tlcr-24-269
PMID:39263014
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11384478/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite its efficacy in reducing lung cancer (LC)-specific mortality by 20%, screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) in eligible groups remains low (5-16%). Black individuals are more commonly affected by LC than other racial/ethnic groups in the United States (U.S.) but less likely to undergo LC screening (LCS). Our study aimed to explore the knowledge and beliefs of Black individuals at high risk regarding LCS.

METHODS

Black individuals (n=17) who met the 2021 United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) LCS eligibility criteria were recruited in upstate New York. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted, audio recorded, and transcribed to explore knowledge and beliefs that could influence the uptake of LCS. A qualitative thematic analysis method was used to identify and analyze themes within the data.

RESULTS

We identified principal themes about LC and LCS. Although most participants reported that smoking was the major risk factor for LC, some participants placed more emphasis on other factors as the major risk factors for LC and de-emphasized the role of smoking. Most participants were not aware that screening for LC existed. Several barriers and facilitators for LCS were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Awareness about LCS among Black individuals is low. Addressing barriers may help increase LCS rates among Black individuals, ultimately reducing their LC mortality. The findings from our study have important implications in designing more effective interventions involving community health workers and healthcare clinicians to increase LCS uptake among Black individuals at high risk.

摘要

背景

尽管低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)筛查可将肺癌(LC)特异性死亡率降低20%,但符合条件人群的筛查率仍然很低(5%-16%)。在美国,黑人比其他种族/族裔群体更易患LC,但接受LC筛查(LCS)的可能性更小。我们的研究旨在探讨高危黑人个体对LCS的认知和信念。

方法

在纽约州北部招募了符合2021年美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)LCS资格标准的黑人个体(n=17)。进行了深入的半结构化访谈,进行了录音并转录,以探讨可能影响LCS接受度的知识和信念。采用定性主题分析方法来识别和分析数据中的主题。

结果

我们确定了关于LC和LCS的主要主题。尽管大多数参与者报告吸烟是LC的主要危险因素,但一些参与者更强调其他因素是LC的主要危险因素,并淡化了吸烟的作用。大多数参与者不知道存在LC筛查。确定了LCS的几个障碍和促进因素。

结论

黑人个体对LCS的认知度较低。消除障碍可能有助于提高黑人个体的LCS率,最终降低他们的LC死亡率。我们研究的结果对于设计更有效的干预措施具有重要意义,这些干预措施涉及社区卫生工作者和医疗保健临床医生,以提高高危黑人个体对LCS的接受度。

相似文献

1
Knowledge and beliefs about lung cancer screening among Black individuals at high risk: a qualitative approach.高危黑人个体对肺癌筛查的认知与信念:一种定性研究方法
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2024 Aug 31;13(8):1877-1887. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-24-269. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
4
How Do Individuals Perceive Diagnostic Labels and Explanations for Hip Pain? A Qualitative Study Among Adults With Persistent Hip Pain.个体如何看待髋关节疼痛的诊断标签和解释?一项针对持续性髋关节疼痛成年人的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 5. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003445.
5
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
6
Understanding Barriers to Engagement With a Prostate Cancer Research and Genetic Risk Service Among UK Men of Black African or Black Caribbean Ancestry.了解英国非洲裔或加勒比裔黑人男性参与前列腺癌研究和遗传风险服务的障碍。
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70282. doi: 10.1111/hex.70282.
7
Accelerating integration of tobacco use treatment in the context of lung cancer screening: Relevance and application of implementation science to achieving policy and practice.加速肺癌筛查背景下的烟草使用治疗整合:实施科学在实现政策和实践方面的相关性和应用。
Transl Behav Med. 2022 Nov 21;12(11):1076-1083. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac076.
8
Factors that influence caregivers' and adolescents' views and practices regarding human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for adolescents: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响照顾者和青少年对青少年人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗接种的看法及做法的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 15;4(4):CD013430. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013430.pub2.
9
Reducing Smoking Requirements for Lung Screening to Address Health Disparities in a Community Cohort.降低肺部筛查的吸烟要求以解决社区队列中的健康差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2517149. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.17149.
10
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Effective Communication About Lung Cancer Screening Without Iatrogenic Stigma: A Brief Report Case Study Using the Lung Cancer Stigma Communications Assessment Tool of .关于肺癌筛查的有效沟通且无医源性污名:一项简短报告案例研究,使用了……的肺癌污名沟通评估工具
JTO Clin Res Rep. 2023 Oct 13;4(11):100585. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2023.100585. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
Understanding Factors Associated with Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening among Individuals at High Risk.了解高危人群接受肺癌筛查的相关因素。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2023;34(2):719-730. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2023.0038.
3
Inequalities in Environmental Cancer Risk and Carcinogen Exposures: A Scoping Review.
环境癌症风险和致癌物暴露中的不平等:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 May 4;20(9):5718. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20095718.
4
Facilitators and Barriers to Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening: A Framework-Driven Systematic Review.肺癌筛查实施的促进因素和障碍:基于框架的系统综述。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022 Nov 14;114(11):1449-1467. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djac154.
5
Likelihood of Lung Cancer Screening by Poor Health Status and Race and Ethnicity in US Adults, 2017 to 2020.美国成年人 2017 至 2020 年按健康状况和种族/族裔评估肺癌筛查的可能性
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e225318. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.5318.
6
Knowledge and attitudes towards low dose computed tomography lung cancer screening and smoking among African Americans-a mixed method study.非裔美国人对低剂量计算机断层扫描肺癌筛查和吸烟的认知与态度——一项混合方法研究
Transl Cancer Res. 2019 Jul;8(Suppl 4):S431-S442. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2019.04.18.
7
Screening for Lung Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.肺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):962-970. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.1117.
8
Cancer Statistics, 2021.癌症统计数据,2021.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jan;71(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21654. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
9
Using Prediction Models to Reduce Persistent Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Draft 2020 USPSTF Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines.利用预测模型减少 2020 年 USPSTF 肺癌筛查指南草案中持续存在的种族和民族差异。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Nov 2;113(11):1590-1594. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa211.
10
Understanding barriers to lung cancer screening in primary care.了解初级保健中肺癌筛查的障碍。
J Thorac Dis. 2020 May;12(5):2536-2544. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.03.66.