• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

降低肺部筛查的吸烟要求以解决社区队列中的健康差异。

Reducing Smoking Requirements for Lung Screening to Address Health Disparities in a Community Cohort.

作者信息

Smeltzer Matthew P, Liao Wei, Goss Jordan, Qureshi Talat, Johnson Sara, Harris Amanda, Dortch Kourtney, Fehnel Carrie, Ely Sora, Ray Meredith, Osarogiagbon Raymond U

机构信息

Division of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee.

Thoracic Oncology Research Group, Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Program, Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2517149. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.17149.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.17149
PMID:40553471
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12188365/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Many individuals with lung cancer are not eligible for lung cancer screening (LCS). Race-based and sex-based differences in smoking patterns reduce the effectiveness of LCS criteria.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the value of expanding LCS criteria beyond US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) 2021 guidelines by relaxing cigarette smoking exposure criteria.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study included individuals enrolled in an incidental pulmonary nodule (IPN) program with non-screening-detected, potentially malignant pulmonary nodules, or enrolled in a LCS program from 2015 to 2023. Participants were treated in a community-based health care system serving more than 125 counties in Mississippi, Tennessee, Arkansas, Kentucky, Missouri, and Alabama. Data were examined from October 1, 2024, to May 29, 2025.

EXPOSURES

LCS eligibility criteria included USPSTF 2021, Potter criteria (20-year smoking history), and American Cancer Society criteria ([ACS] 20 pack-years, no quit duration), and expansions to 10 years or 10 pack-years.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcomes were proportions of individuals eligible for LCS and diagnosis of lung cancer. Characteristics between groups were compared using the χ2 test for categorical variables and the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables.

RESULTS

In this study, 43 521 individuals were evaluated, including 13 770 (32%) from LCS and 29 751 (68%) from IPN programs. Of the 29751 individuals in IPN programs, 3840 (13%) were eligible for LCS by USPSTF 2021 criteria, 4905 (16%) by IPN-Potter criteria, 5263 (18%) by IPN-ACS criteria, and 6307 (21%) by IPN-Potter-ACS criteria. There were 1103 additional individuals eligible by IPN-Potter criteria (606 female [55%] and 382 Black [35%]), 1423 by IPN-ACS criteria (628 female [44%]; 237 Black [17%]), and 2467 by IPN-Potter-ACS criteria (1200 female [49%]; 615 Black [25%]). There were significant differences in the number of additional eligible individuals who were female (55% vs 48%; P < .001) and Black (35% vs 22%; P < .001) between the IPN-Potter and USPSTF 2021 criteria. Lung cancer was diagnosed in 504 of 13 770 of LCS enrollees (4%) and 1714 of 29 751 of IPN enrollees (6%), including 872 of 4905 (18%) eligible by IPN-Potter criteria, 955 of 5263 (18%) by IPN-ACS criteria, and 1051 of 6307 (17%) by IPN-Potter-ACS criteria. The additional eligible individuals with lung cancer in IPN programs who were female included 70 of 128 (55%) by IPN-Potter criteria, 89 of 208 (43%) by IPN-ACS criteria, and 143 of 304 (47%) by IPN-Potter-ACS criteria, with statistically significant differences between the IPN-Potter criteria and USPSTF 2021 criteria (55% vs 48%; P < .001). The additional eligible individuals who were Black included 50 of 128 (39%) by IPN-Potter criteria, 32 of 208 (15%) by IPN-ACS criteria, and 73 of 304 (24%) by IPN-Potter-ACS criteria, with statistically significant differences between IPN-Potter criteria and IPN-USPSTF 2021 criteria (39% vs 22%; P < .001). When LCS criteria were expanded to individuals older than 50 years who had smoked for 10 years or 10 pack-years, 7993 of 29 751 individuals (27%) from IPN programs would have been eligible. Among these, 1251 of 7993 (16%) were diagnosed with lung cancer.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study, changing smoking criteria from 20 pack-years to a 20-year smoking history was associated with improved access to LCS while maintaining diagnostic efficiency. Expansion to individuals with a 10-year or 10 pack-years smoking history should be explored.

摘要

重要性

许多肺癌患者不符合肺癌筛查(LCS)的条件。基于种族和性别的吸烟模式差异降低了LCS标准的有效性。

目的

通过放宽吸烟暴露标准,评估在美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)2021年指南之外扩大LCS标准的价值。

设计、设置和参与者:这项队列研究纳入了参加偶发性肺结节(IPN)项目的个体,这些个体有非筛查发现的、潜在恶性的肺结节,或在2015年至2023年期间参加LCS项目。参与者在一个服务于密西西比州、田纳西州、阿肯色州、肯塔基州、密苏里州和阿拉巴马州125多个县的社区医疗保健系统中接受治疗。数据于2024年10月1日至2025年5月29日进行检查。

暴露因素

LCS资格标准包括USPSTF 2021年标准、波特标准(20年吸烟史)和美国癌症协会标准([ACS]20包年,无戒烟时长),以及扩展到10年或10包年。

主要结局和测量指标

主要结局是符合LCS条件的个体比例和肺癌诊断情况。使用卡方检验比较分类变量组间特征,使用威尔科克森-曼-惠特尼检验比较连续变量组间特征。

结果

在本研究中,共评估了43521名个体,其中13770名(32%)来自LCS项目,29751名(68%)来自IPN项目。在IPN项目的29751名个体中,根据USPSTF 2021年标准,3840名(13%)符合LCS条件;根据IPN-波特标准,4905名(16%)符合条件;根据IPN-ACS标准,5263名(18%)符合条件;根据IPN-波特-ACS标准,6307名(21%)符合条件。根据IPN-波特标准,还有1103名个体符合条件(606名女性[55%],382名黑人[35%]);根据IPN-ACS标准,有1423名个体符合条件(628名女性[44%];237名黑人[17%]);根据IPN-波特-ACS标准,有2467名个体符合条件(1200名女性[49%];615名黑人[25%])。在IPN-波特标准和USPSTF 2021年标准之间,额外符合条件的女性个体数量(55%对48%;P<0.001)和黑人个体数量(35%对22%;P<0.001)存在显著差异。在13770名LCS参与者中,有504名(4%)被诊断为肺癌;在29751名IPN参与者中,有1714名(6%)被诊断为肺癌,包括根据IPN-波特标准符合条件的4905名中的872名(18%),根据IPN-ACS标准符合条件的5263名中的955名(18%),以及根据IPN-波特-ACS标准符合条件的6307名中的1051名(17%)。IPN项目中额外符合条件且患有肺癌的女性个体,根据IPN-波特标准为128名中的70名(55%),根据IPN-ACS标准为208名中的89名(43%),根据IPN-波特-ACS标准为304名中的143名(47%),IPN-波特标准和USPSTF 2021年标准之间存在统计学显著差异(55%对48%;P<0.001)。额外符合条件且为黑人的个体,根据IPN-波特标准为128名中的50名(39%),根据IPN-ACS标准为208名中的32名(15%),根据IPN-波特-ACS标准为304名中的73名(24%),IPN-波特标准和IPN-USPSTF 2021年标准之间存在统计学显著差异(39%对22%;P<0.001)。当LCS标准扩大到50岁以上且吸烟10年或10包年的个体时,IPN项目的29751名个体中有7993名(27%)符合条件。其中,7993名中有1251名(16%)被诊断为肺癌。

结论和相关性

在这项队列研究中,将吸烟标准从20包年改为20年吸烟史与改善LCS可及性相关,同时保持诊断效率。应探索将标准扩展到有10年或10包年吸烟史的个体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4633/12188365/7dd9625095b3/jamanetwopen-e2517149-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4633/12188365/c90190b2f961/jamanetwopen-e2517149-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4633/12188365/6a7a6d9b5429/jamanetwopen-e2517149-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4633/12188365/7dd9625095b3/jamanetwopen-e2517149-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4633/12188365/c90190b2f961/jamanetwopen-e2517149-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4633/12188365/6a7a6d9b5429/jamanetwopen-e2517149-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4633/12188365/7dd9625095b3/jamanetwopen-e2517149-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Reducing Smoking Requirements for Lung Screening to Address Health Disparities in a Community Cohort.降低肺部筛查的吸烟要求以解决社区队列中的健康差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2517149. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.17149.
2
Persistent race- and sex-based disparities in lung cancer screening eligibility.肺癌筛查资格方面持续存在的基于种族和性别的差异。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Jul;168(1):248-260.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.10.025. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Gender Disparities and Lung Cancer Screening Outcomes Among Individuals Who Have Never Smoked.从不吸烟个体中的性别差异与肺癌筛查结果
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2454057. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54057.
5
Prediction-Augmented Shared Decision-Making and Lung Cancer Screening Uptake.预测增强型共享决策与肺癌筛查参与度。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2419624. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.19624.
6
Individual- and Group-Level Disparities Between Racial and Ethnic Groups in Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility Criteria.肺癌筛查资格标准中种族和族裔群体在个体及群体层面的差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e252172. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.2172.
7
Using Community Health Advisors to Increase Lung Cancer Screening Awareness in the Black Belt: a Pilot Study.利用社区健康顾问提高黑带地区肺癌筛查意识:一项试点研究。
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Aug;38(4):1286-1295. doi: 10.1007/s13187-022-02261-w. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
9
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
10
Accelerating integration of tobacco use treatment in the context of lung cancer screening: Relevance and application of implementation science to achieving policy and practice.加速肺癌筛查背景下的烟草使用治疗整合:实施科学在实现政策和实践方面的相关性和应用。
Transl Behav Med. 2022 Nov 21;12(11):1076-1083. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac076.

本文引用的文献

1
Screening Low-Risk Individuals for Lung Cancer: The Need May Be Present, but the Evidence of Benefit Is Not.筛查低危肺癌患者:可能存在需求,但获益证据不足。
J Thorac Oncol. 2024 Aug;19(8):1155-1163. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2024.05.001.
2
Shades of Gray: Do Never Smokers Benefit From Lung Cancer Screening Programs?灰色地带:从不吸烟者能从肺癌筛查项目中获益吗?
J Thorac Oncol. 2024 Aug;19(8):1135-1137. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2024.06.007.
3
Lung Cancer Screening in the US, 2022.2022 年美国肺癌筛查
JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Aug 1;184(8):882-891. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.1655.
4
Pack-Year Smoking History: An Inadequate and Biased Measure to Determine Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility.吸烟包年数:一种评估肺癌筛查资格的不充分且有偏差的方法。
J Clin Oncol. 2024 Jun 10;42(17):2026-2037. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.01780. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
5
Low-dose CT screening among never-smokers with or without a family history of lung cancer in Taiwan: a prospective cohort study.台湾不吸烟人群和有肺癌家族史人群的低剂量 CT 筛查:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2024 Feb;12(2):141-152. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00338-7. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
6
Screening for lung cancer: 2023 guideline update from the American Cancer Society.肺癌筛查:美国癌症协会 2023 年指南更新。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 Jan-Feb;74(1):50-81. doi: 10.3322/caac.21811. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
7
ERS/ESTS/ESTRO/ESR/ESTI/EFOMP statement on management of incidental findings from low dose CT screening for lung cancer.ERS/ESTS/ESTRO/ESR/ESTI/EFOMP 关于低剂量 CT 筛查肺癌时偶然发现的管理声明。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Oct 4;64(4). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezad302.
8
Expanding the Reach and Grasp of Lung Cancer Screening.扩大肺癌筛查的范围和影响力。
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2023 Jan;43:e389958. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_389958.
9
Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death.结肠镜筛查对结直肠癌发病风险和相关死亡的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Oct 27;387(17):1547-1556. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2208375. Epub 2022 Oct 9.
10
Potential Impact of Criteria Modifications on Race and Sex Disparities in Eligibility for Lung Cancer Screening.标准修改对肺癌筛查资格中种族和性别差异的潜在影响。
J Thorac Oncol. 2023 Feb;18(2):158-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2022.09.220. Epub 2022 Oct 5.