Hamitouche Sirine, Boubaker Fatma, Hossu Gabriela, Sirveaux François, Gillet Romain, Blum Alain, Gondim Teixeira Pedro Augusto
Guilloz Imaging Department, Hôpital Central, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nancy, 29, avenue du Maréchal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 54035 Nancy Cedex, France.
Université de Lorraine, Inserm, Iadi, 54000 Nancy, France.
Res Diagn Interv Imaging. 2024 Aug 23;11:100052. doi: 10.1016/j.redii.2024.100052. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Our study aims to quantitatively determine the concavity of the glenoid articular surface in patients with hypermobile shoulders compared to those without.
We examined medical records of shoulder CTs from 2017 to 2022, selecting 50 patients with clinical signs of joint hypermobility for our case group and 54 for our control group. Two blinded readers independently assessed the glenoid morphology, calculating the glenoid concavity angle (GCA) and evaluating the articular surface shape as concave, flat, or convex. They also recorded the presence and severity of glenoid dysplasia. We compared these assessments between groups.
The mean GCA was significantly lower in the hypermobile group (2.3 ± 3.7° and 2.3 ± 3.8°) versus controls (6.6 ± 3.3° and 5.3 ± 3.8°) ( < 0.05). Interobserver reproducibility was high (ICC=0.76). A stark difference in glenoid morphology was noted between groups ( < 0.001), with a majority of hypermobile patients having a flat or convex glenoid. GCAs decreased with increasing shoulder laxity and dysplasia. GCA showed 77-81 % sensitivity and 55-82 % specificity for detecting shoulder hyperlaxity with a 4° cutoff.
There is a significant association between GCA and shoulder hyperlaxity, demonstrating diagnostic efficacy and substantial interobserver agreement.
GCA values lower than 4° warrant further clinical investigation for shoulder hyperlaxity and associated conditions, which is crucial for patient treatment planning.
我们的研究旨在定量测定与非活动度过高的肩部患者相比,活动度过高的肩部患者的肩胛骨关节面的凹陷程度。
我们检查了2017年至2022年肩部CT的病历,为病例组选择了50名有关节活动度过高临床体征的患者,为对照组选择了54名患者。两名不知情的阅片者独立评估肩胛盂形态,计算肩胛盂凹陷角(GCA),并将关节面形状评估为凹陷、平坦或凸起。他们还记录了肩胛盂发育异常的存在情况和严重程度。我们比较了两组之间的这些评估结果。
活动度过高组的平均GCA显著低于对照组(分别为2.3±3.7°和2.3±3.8°)与(6.6±3.3°和5.3±3.8°)(P<0.05)。观察者间的可重复性很高(ICC=0.76)。两组之间在肩胛盂形态上存在显著差异(P<0.001),大多数活动度过高的患者肩胛盂为平坦或凸起。GCA随着肩部松弛度和发育异常的增加而降低。以4°为临界值时,GCA检测肩部过度松弛的敏感性为77%-81%,特异性为55%-82%。
GCA与肩部过度松弛之间存在显著关联,证明了其诊断效力以及观察者间的高度一致性。
GCA值低于4°值得对肩部过度松弛及相关病症进行进一步临床研究,这对患者治疗方案的制定至关重要。