• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对于传统影像学检查阴性的病理淋巴结阳性前列腺癌,观察与后续挽救性治疗的比较:来自大型多中心队列的结果

Observation With or Without Subsequent Salvage Therapy for Pathologically Node-positive Prostate Cancer With Negative Conventional Imaging: Results From a Large Multicenter Cohort.

作者信息

Marra Giancarlo, Lesma Federico, Montefusco Gabriele, Filippini Claudia, Olivier Jonathan, Affentranger Andres, Grogg Josias Bastian, Hermanns Thomas, Afferi Luca, Fankhauser Christian D, Mattei Agostino, Malkiewicz Bartosz, Scuderi Simone, Barletta Francesco, Gallina Sebastian, Antonelli Alessandro, Zattoni Fabio, Dal Moro Fabrizio, Lieke Wever, Soeterik Timo, van den Bergh Roderick C N, Rajwa Pawel, Shariat Shahrokh F, Rodriguez-Sanchez Lara, Nicoletti Rossella, Campi Riccardo, Ahmed Mohamed, Jeffrey Karnes R, Ladurner Michael, Heidegger Isabel, Briganti Alberto, Gontero Paolo, Gandaglia Giorgio

机构信息

Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin and Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.

Department of Urology, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France.

出版信息

Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024 Aug 22;68:32-39. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.06.016. eCollection 2024 Oct.

DOI:10.1016/j.euros.2024.06.016
PMID:39263349
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11387258/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

More than 10% of patients with negative clinical metastatic status (cN0M0) on conventional imaging for prostate cancer (PCa) harbor lymph node involvement (pN+) at final pathology following radical prostatectomy (RP) and lymphadenectomy. Our aim was to assess outcomes of initial observation for cN0M0 pN+ PCa and identify prognostic factors that may help in clinical decision-making.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective multicenter study of patients with cN0M0 PCa on conventional imaging (computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging, and a bone scan) who were found to have pN+ disease at RP between 2000 and 2021. Biochemical recurrence (BCR) and systemic progression/recurrence were the primary outcomes. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards model were used for survival and multivariate analysis.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

A total of 469 men were included in this retrospective multicenter trial. Median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 10.1 ng/ml (interquartile range [IQR] 6.6-18.0). Among these patients, 56% had grade group ≥4, 53.7% had stage ≥pT3b, 42.6% had positive margins, and 19.6% had PSA persistence. The median number of positive nodes and of nodes removed were 1 (IQR 1-3) and 20 (14-28), respectively. At median follow-up of 41 mo, 48.5% experienced BCR. The 5-yr BCR-free survival rate was 31.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 26.33-37.1%). Salvage treatments were needed in 211 patients and included radiotherapy (RT;  = 53), RT + androgen deprivation therapy (ADT;  = 88), ADT alone ( = 68), and salvage lymphadenectomy ( = 2). The 5-yr estimated survival rates were 66.3% (95% CI 60.4-72.1) for metastasis-free survival, 97.7% (95% CI 95.5-99.8%) for cancer-specific survival, and 95.3% (95% CI 92.4-98.1%) for overall survival. On multivariable analysis, PSA persistence was an independent predictor of BCR (odds ratio [OR] 51.8, 95% CI 12.2-219.2), exit from observation (OR 8.5, 95% CI 4.4-16.5), and systemic progression (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.771-4.971).

CONCLUSIONS

Initial observation in the management of pN+ cN0M0 PCa is feasible and has excellent survival rates in the intermediate term. Patients with worse disease features, especially PSA persistence, have a higher likelihood of recurrence and progression and may be candidates for more aggressive upfront management.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We investigated the value of initial observation for men with prostate cancer with negative scan findings for metastasis who were then found to have positive lymph nodes after surgery to remove the prostate. Our results show that initial observation is a good option for patients with less aggressive prostate cancer features.

摘要

背景与目的

在前列腺癌(PCa)的传统影像学检查中,临床转移状态为阴性(cN0M0)的患者中,超过10%在根治性前列腺切除术(RP)及淋巴结清扫术后的最终病理检查中存在淋巴结转移(pN+)。我们的目的是评估cN0M0 pN+ PCa患者初始观察的结果,并确定可能有助于临床决策的预后因素。

方法

我们对2000年至2021年间在传统影像学检查(计算机断层扫描和/或磁共振成像以及骨扫描)中cN0M0 PCa且在RP时发现有pN+疾病的患者进行了一项回顾性多中心研究。生化复发(BCR)和全身进展/复发是主要结局。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线和Cox比例风险模型进行生存分析和多变量分析。

主要发现与局限性

这项回顾性多中心试验共纳入469名男性。前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)中位数为10.1 ng/ml(四分位间距[IQR] 6.6 - 18.0)。在这些患者中,56%的分级组≥4,53.7%的分期≥pT3b,42.6%的手术切缘阳性,19.6%的患者PSA持续存在。阳性淋巴结的中位数和切除淋巴结的中位数分别为1(IQR 1 - 3)和20(14 - 28)。中位随访41个月时,48.5%的患者出现BCR。5年无BCR生存率为31.7%(95%置信区间[CI] 26.33 - 37.1%)。211名患者需要挽救性治疗,包括放疗(RT; = 53)、RT + 雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT; = 88)、单纯ADT( = 68)以及挽救性淋巴结清扫术( = 2)。5年无转移生存率估计为66.3%(95% CI 60.4 - 72.1),癌症特异性生存率为97.7%(95% CI 95.5 - 99.8%),总生存率为95.3%(95% CI 92.4 - 98.1%)。多变量分析显示,PSA持续存在是BCR(优势比[OR] 51.8,95% CI 12.2 - 219.2)、终止观察(OR 8.5,95% CI 4.4 - 16.5)和全身进展(OR 3.0,95% CI 1.771 - 4.971)的独立预测因素。

结论

pN+ cN0M0 PCa患者的初始观察是可行的,中期生存率良好。疾病特征较差的患者,尤其是PSA持续存在的患者,复发和进展的可能性更高,可能是更积极初始治疗的候选者。

患者总结

我们研究了对前列腺癌转移扫描结果为阴性但术后发现淋巴结阳性的男性进行初始观察的价值。我们的结果表明,初始观察对于前列腺癌侵袭性较低的患者是一个不错的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c2d/11387258/12ed91dbc506/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c2d/11387258/96f4c6145293/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c2d/11387258/12ed91dbc506/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c2d/11387258/96f4c6145293/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c2d/11387258/12ed91dbc506/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Observation With or Without Subsequent Salvage Therapy for Pathologically Node-positive Prostate Cancer With Negative Conventional Imaging: Results From a Large Multicenter Cohort.对于传统影像学检查阴性的病理淋巴结阳性前列腺癌,观察与后续挽救性治疗的比较:来自大型多中心队列的结果
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024 Aug 22;68:32-39. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.06.016. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Long-term Outcomes of Salvage Lymph Node Dissection for Nodal Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: Not as Good as Previously Thought.根治性前列腺切除术后前列腺癌淋巴结复发行挽救性淋巴结清扫术的长期疗效:并不如先前认为的那样好。
Eur Urol. 2020 Nov;78(5):661-669. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.043. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
3
The Role of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy for the Prediction of Clinical Progression and Cancer-specific Mortality in Node-positive Prostate Cancer Patients.根治性前列腺切除术后前列腺特异性抗原持续存在对预测淋巴结阳性前列腺癌患者临床进展和癌症特异性死亡率的作用。
Eur Urol. 2016 Jun;69(6):1142-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.010. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
4
Long-term outcomes of salvage lymph node dissection for clinically recurrent prostate cancer: results of a single-institution series with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.对于临床复发的前列腺癌患者行挽救性淋巴结清扫术的长期疗效:单机构系列研究结果,随访时间至少 5 年。
Eur Urol. 2015 Feb;67(2):299-309. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.011. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
5
The Prognostic Role of Preoperative PSMA PET/CT in cN0M0 pN+ Prostate Cancer: A Multicenter Study.术前PSMA PET/CT在cN0M0 pN+前列腺癌中的预后作用:一项多中心研究。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2024 Apr;22(2):244-251. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.11.006. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
6
Assessing the Optimal Timing for Early Salvage Radiation Therapy in Patients with Prostate-specific Antigen Rise After Radical Prostatectomy.评估前列腺癌根治术后前列腺特异性抗原升高患者早期挽救性放射治疗的最佳时机
Eur Urol. 2016 Apr;69(4):728-733. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.10.009. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
7
Use of Concomitant Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Patients Treated with Early Salvage Radiotherapy for Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy: Long-term Results from a Large, Multi-institutional Series.早期挽救性放疗后生化复发的前列腺癌患者应用同期雄激素剥夺治疗:一项大型多机构系列研究的长期结果。
Eur Urol. 2018 Apr;73(4):512-518. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.11.020. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
8
Predictors of Recurrence After Metastasis-directed Therapy in Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer Following Radical Prostatectomy.寡转移前列腺癌根治术后转移导向治疗后复发的预测因素。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2023 Dec;6(6):582-589. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.02.010. Epub 2023 Mar 4.
9
Definition and Impact on Oncologic Outcomes of Persistently Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen After Salvage Lymph Node Dissection for Node-only Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: Clinical Implications for Multimodal Therapy.根治性前列腺切除术后淋巴结复发的前列腺特异性抗原持续升高对肿瘤学结果的定义和影响:多模态治疗的临床意义。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2022 Jun;5(3):285-295. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.06.003. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
10
Mid-term Outcomes Following Salvage Lymph Node Dissection for Prostate Cancer Nodal Recurrence Status Post-radical Prostatectomy.前列腺癌根治术后淋巴结复发行挽救性淋巴结清扫术的中期结果
Eur Urol Focus. 2016 Dec;2(5):522-531. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-World Management of High-Risk Prostate Cancer Post-Radical Prostatectomy: Insights from a Regional Quality Collaborative.根治性前列腺切除术后高危前列腺癌的真实世界管理:来自区域质量协作的见解
Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 8;17(10):1600. doi: 10.3390/cancers17101600.
2
Prostate-Specific Antigen Decline Rate in the First Month Is a Timely Predictive Factor for Biochemical Recurrence After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.第一个月前列腺特异性抗原下降率是机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发的及时预测因素。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Mar 12;17(6):961. doi: 10.3390/cancers17060961.

本文引用的文献

1
The Changing Face of cN0M0 Prostate Cancer Being Found With pN+ After Surgery in the Contemporary Era: Results of an International European Survey on Disease Management.在当代,越来越多的 cN0M0 前列腺癌患者在手术后被发现 pN+:一项关于疾病管理的国际欧洲调查结果。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2023 Jun;21(3):416.e1-416.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.11.012. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
2
Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer. Part I: Intermediate-/High-risk and Locally Advanced Disease, Biochemical Relapse, and Side Effects of Hormonal Treatment: Report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2022.晚期前列腺癌患者的管理。第一部分:中高危和局部进展性疾病、生化复发和激素治疗的副作用:2022 年晚期前列腺癌共识会议报告。
Eur Urol. 2023 Mar;83(3):267-293. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.11.002. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
3
Adjuvant Versus Early Salvage Radiation Therapy After Radical Prostatectomy for pN1 Prostate Cancer and the Risk of Death.根治性前列腺切除术后 pN1 前列腺癌的辅助与早期挽救性放疗及死亡风险。
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jul 10;40(20):2186-2192. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02800. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
4
Features and management of men with pN1 cM0 prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy and lymphadenectomy: a systematic review of population-based evidence.根治性前列腺切除术和淋巴结清扫术后 pN1 cM0 前列腺癌男性患者的特征与管理:基于人群证据的系统评价
Curr Opin Urol. 2022 Jan 1;32(1):69-84. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000946.
5
A phase 3 randomised study of enzalutamide plus leuprolide and enzalutamide monotherapy in high-risk non-metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer with rising PSA after local therapy: EMBARK study design.一项局部治疗后 PSA 升高的高危非转移性激素敏感性前列腺癌中恩扎卢胺联合亮丙瑞林和恩扎卢胺单药治疗的 3 期随机研究:EMBARK 研究设计。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 12;11(8):e046588. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046588.
6
EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent.EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG 前列腺癌指南-2020 版更新。第 1 部分:筛查、诊断和以治愈为目的的局部治疗。
Eur Urol. 2021 Feb;79(2):243-262. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.042. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
7
Adjuvant or early salvage radiotherapy for the treatment of localised and locally advanced prostate cancer: a prospectively planned systematic review and meta-analysis of aggregate data.辅助或早期挽救性放疗治疗局限性和局部进展性前列腺癌:汇总数据的前瞻性计划系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2020 Oct 31;396(10260):1422-1431. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31952-8. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
8
Management of Patients with Node-positive Prostate Cancer at Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: A Systematic Review.根治性前列腺切除术和盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗淋巴结阳性前列腺癌患者的管理:系统评价。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2020 Oct;3(5):565-581. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.08.005. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Long-term oncological outcomes in patients with limited nodal disease undergoing radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection without adjuvant treatment.局限性淋巴结疾病患者行根治性前列腺切除术和盆腔淋巴结清扫术而未行辅助治疗的长期肿瘤学结果。
World J Urol. 2017 Dec;35(12):1833-1839. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2079-4. Epub 2017 Aug 21.
10
Adjuvant radiation therapy is associated with better oncological outcome compared with salvage radiation therapy in patients with pN1 prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.在接受根治性前列腺切除术治疗的pN1前列腺癌患者中,与挽救性放射治疗相比,辅助性放射治疗与更好的肿瘤学结果相关。
BJU Int. 2017 May;119(5):717-723. doi: 10.1111/bju.13679. Epub 2016 Nov 21.