Zaman Junaid A B, Khan Abdulhaseeb, Nielsen Jan, Kristiansen Steen B, Kronborg Mads B, Witt Christoffer T, Gerdes Christian, Kristensen Jens, Jensen Henrik K, Lukac Peter, Agarwal Sharad C
Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Heart Rhythm O2. 2024 Jul 15;5(8):543-550. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.07.007. eCollection 2024 Aug.
Electrogram dispersion identifies putative atrial fibrillation (AF) drivers in first time ablation procedures, with high acute termination rates and long-term outcomes akin to extensive ablation approaches. Its use in a population that had undergone repeat ablation is unknown, particularly where the pulmonary veins are already isolated.
This purpose of this study was to assess electrogram dispersion mapping during repeat ablation procedures for persistent AF.
One hundred sixty-seven patients from the United Kingdom and Denmark, all with persistent AF recurrence after prior ablation procedure(s), were mapped using a five splined catheter for electrogram dispersion before ablation. Areas were manually tagged on biatrial electroanatomic maps and ablated once pulmonary vein isolation was confirmed or reisolated if required. All patients had 12-month continuous monitoring, with most of the cohort having follow-up beyond 24 months.
Of the 167 patients [53 (32%) female; mean age 66 ± 8 years; mean left atrial (LA) diameter 4.8 cm; mean ejection fraction 53%], 108 had pulmonary veins already isolated. Dispersion sites occurred in both atria (3.2 LA, 1.4 right atrium). Acute termination to sinus rhythm occurred in 71 (42%) of the cohort patients, with a further 73 (44%) terminating to atrial tachycardia/flutter. At 12-month follow-up, 95% of patients were free of AF, with 74% overall freedom from all atrial arrhythmias. Heart failure and severely enlarged LA predicted recurrence, and termination to sinus improved freedom from all atrial arrhythmias.
Dispersion mapping is a promising approach at repeat ablation procedures for persistent AF, with high acute termination rates and good clinical outcomes. Further prospective randomized trials are needed to evaluate this approach in a population that had undergone repeat ablation.
在首次消融手术中,心电图离散度可识别潜在的房颤驱动因素,其急性终止率高,长期预后与广泛消融方法相似。其在接受过重复消融的人群中的应用尚不清楚,尤其是在肺静脉已被隔离的情况下。
本研究旨在评估持续性房颤重复消融手术期间的心电图离散度标测。
来自英国和丹麦的167例患者,均在先前消融手术后出现持续性房颤复发,在消融前使用五曲线导管进行心电图离散度标测。在双房电解剖图上手动标记区域,一旦确认肺静脉隔离或必要时重新隔离后进行消融。所有患者均接受12个月的连续监测,大多数队列患者随访超过24个月。
167例患者中[53例(32%)为女性;平均年龄66±8岁;平均左房直径4.8 cm;平均射血分数53%],108例肺静脉已被隔离。离散部位出现在双房(左房3.2个,右房1.4个)。71例(42%)队列患者急性终止为窦性心律,另有73例(44%)终止为房性心动过速/心房扑动。在12个月的随访中,95%的患者无房颤,74%的患者总体上无所有房性心律失常。心力衰竭和左房严重扩大预示复发,终止为窦性心律可改善所有房性心律失常的无病状态。
离散度标测是持续性房颤重复消融手术中一种有前景的方法,急性终止率高,临床效果良好。需要进一步的前瞻性随机试验来评估这种方法在接受过重复消融的人群中的应用。