• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以患者为中心的自我管理干预对南亚 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制、自我效能和自我护理行为的影响:一项多中心随机对照试验。

Effect of patient-centered self-management intervention on glycemic control, self-efficacy, and self-care behaviors in South Asian adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Department of Physiological Nursing, School of Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.

出版信息

J Diabetes. 2024 Sep;16(9):e13611. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.13611.

DOI:10.1111/1753-0407.13611
PMID:39264007
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11391380/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to test the efficacy of patient-centered self-management intervention (PACE-SMI) to improve HbA1c, self-efficacy, and self-care behaviors in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS

In this multicenter, parallel two-arm randomized controlled trial, 612 adults with T2DM and HbA1c ≥ 7% were enrolled and assigned to the control group (n = 310) and the intervention group (n = 302) using stratified permuted block randomization. The control group received usual care, whereas the intervention group received usual care plus nurse-led, theory-driven, culturally tailored PACE-SMI, comprising eight weekly sessions of individualized education, counseling, behavioral training, and home visit. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, postintervention, and 3 months follow-up.

RESULTS

Data at 3 months were provided by 583 participants (control: n = 295, intervention: n = 288). Per-protocol analysis showed that the intervention group had a lower mean HbA1c (8.49% [standard deviation (SD), 1.58]) than the control group (8.74% [SD, 1.62]), with small yet statistically significant mean difference of 0.25% (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.01 to 0.51; Cohen's d = 0.16; p = 0.03). Self-efficacy and self-care behaviors significantly improved in the intervention group (116.89 [SD, 25.50] and 70.01 [SD, 17.97]) compared to the control group (75.43 [SD, 18.99] and 51.54 [SD, 12.04]), with mean differences of 41.48 (95% CI, 37.83-45.13; Cohen's d = 1.84; p < 0.0001) and 18.56 (95% CI, 16.08-21.04; Cohen's d = 1.22; p < 0.0001), respectively. Linear regression analysis indicated the effect of PACE-SMI on HbA1c was significantly mediated by improvements in self-efficacy and self-care behaviors (R = 0.232, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

PACE-SMI led to modest but significant improvement in HbA1c and substantial enhancements in self-efficacy and self-care behaviors in adults with T2DM.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在检验以患者为中心的自我管理干预(PACE-SMI)在改善 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)成人的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、自我效能和自我护理行为方面的疗效。

方法

在这项多中心、平行双臂随机对照试验中,纳入了 612 名糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)≥7%的 T2DM 成人,并采用分层区组随机化方法分为对照组(n=310)和干预组(n=302)。对照组接受常规护理,而干预组接受护士主导、基于理论、文化适应的 PACE-SMI,包括八次个性化教育、咨询、行为培训和家访。在基线、干预后和 3 个月随访时评估结局。

结果

583 名参与者(对照组:n=295,干预组:n=288)提供了 3 个月的数据。意向治疗分析显示,干预组的平均 HbA1c(8.49%[标准差(SD),1.58%])低于对照组(8.74%[SD,1.62%]),差异具有统计学意义,均值差为 0.25%(95%置信区间[CI],-0.01 至 0.51;Cohen's d=0.16;p=0.03)。与对照组相比,干预组的自我效能(116.89[SD,25.50])和自我护理行为(70.01[SD,17.97])显著提高,差异分别为 41.48(95%CI,37.83-45.13;Cohen's d=1.84;p<0.0001)和 18.56(95%CI,16.08-21.04;Cohen's d=1.22;p<0.0001)。线性回归分析表明,PACE-SMI 对 HbA1c 的影响主要通过自我效能和自我护理行为的改善来介导(R=0.232,p<0.001)。

结论

PACE-SMI 可使 T2DM 成人的 HbA1c 适度改善,自我效能和自我护理行为显著增强。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f9e/11391380/5d03cfe5b5de/JDB-16-e13611-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f9e/11391380/d8467105832d/JDB-16-e13611-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f9e/11391380/5d03cfe5b5de/JDB-16-e13611-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f9e/11391380/d8467105832d/JDB-16-e13611-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f9e/11391380/5d03cfe5b5de/JDB-16-e13611-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of patient-centered self-management intervention on glycemic control, self-efficacy, and self-care behaviors in South Asian adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.以患者为中心的自我管理干预对南亚 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制、自我效能和自我护理行为的影响:一项多中心随机对照试验。
J Diabetes. 2024 Sep;16(9):e13611. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.13611.
2
Comparative Effectiveness and Maintenance of Diabetes Self-Management Education Interventions for Marshallese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial.比较 2 型糖尿病马绍尔群岛患者的糖尿病自我管理教育干预措施的有效性和维持情况:一项随机对照试验。
Diabetes Care. 2019 May;42(5):849-858. doi: 10.2337/dc18-1985. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
3
Mobile App for Improved Self-Management of Type 2 Diabetes: Multicenter Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.移动应用程序改善 2 型糖尿病的自我管理:多中心实用随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 10;7(1):e10321. doi: 10.2196/10321.
4
Health literacy, self-efficacy, self-care behaviors, and glycemic control among older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study in Thai communities.健康素养、自我效能、自我护理行为与 2 型糖尿病老年患者的血糖控制:泰国社区的一项横断面研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 May 16;23(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04010-0.
5
The effectiveness of patient activation intervention on type 2 diabetes mellitus glycemic control and self-management behaviors: A systematic review of RCTs.患者激活干预对 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制和自我管理行为的有效性:随机对照试验的系统评价。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2020 Feb;14(1):12-20. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2019.08.009. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
6
A peer support intervention in improving glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.同伴支持干预在改善 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制中的作用。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Mar;101(3):460-466. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.10.007. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
7
BetaMe: impact of a comprehensive digital health programme on HbA1c and weight at 12 months for people with diabetes and pre-diabetes: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.BetaMe:一项综合数字健康计划对糖尿病和糖尿病前期患者12个月时糖化血红蛋白和体重的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Mar 5;19(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2528-4.
8
Efficacy of a self-management education programme on patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care: A randomised controlled trial.一项自我管理教育计划对基层医疗中2型糖尿病患者的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2019 Apr;13(2):122-133. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2018.10.001. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
9
Effect of a Nurse-Led Diabetes Self-Management Education Program on Glycosylated Hemoglobin among Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.护士主导的糖尿病自我管理教育方案对 2 型糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白的影响。
J Diabetes Res. 2018 Jul 8;2018:4930157. doi: 10.1155/2018/4930157. eCollection 2018.
10
Structured peer-led diabetes self-management and support in a low-income country: The ST2EP randomised controlled trial in Mali.低收入国家中由同伴主导的结构化糖尿病自我管理与支持:马里的ST2EP随机对照试验
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 22;13(1):e0191262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191262. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of nurse-led self-management education on type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis.护士主导的自我管理教育对2型糖尿病的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 11;13:1622988. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1622988. eCollection 2025.
2
Analysis of the current status of self-management ability and related influencing factors in patients with neurogenic bladder due to traumatic spinal cord injury.创伤性脊髓损伤所致神经源性膀胱患者自我管理能力现状及相关影响因素分析
World J Urol. 2025 May 4;43(1):264. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05521-8.

本文引用的文献

1
A Patient-Centered Self-Management Intervention to Improve Glycemic Control, Self-Efficacy and Self-Care Behaviors in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A SPIRIT Compliant Study Protocol for Randomized Controlled Trial.一项以患者为中心的自我管理干预措施,旨在改善2型糖尿病成年患者的血糖控制、自我效能和自我护理行为:一项符合SPIRIT标准的随机对照试验研究方案
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2023 Jan 26;16:225-236. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S385715. eCollection 2023.
2
Predictors of self-care behaviors and glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.2 型糖尿病患者自我护理行为和血糖控制的预测因素。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 11;10:1031655. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1031655. eCollection 2022.
3
The effectiveness of patient-centered care vs. usual care in type 2 diabetes self-management: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
患者为中心的护理与常规护理在 2 型糖尿病自我管理中的效果比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 28;10:994766. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.994766. eCollection 2022.
4
The increasing rate of diabetes in Pakistan: A silent killer.巴基斯坦糖尿病发病率上升:一个无声的杀手。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Jun 3;79:103901. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103901. eCollection 2022 Jul.
5
Diabetes in Pakistan: addressing the crisis.巴基斯坦的糖尿病:应对危机
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2022 May;10(5):309-310. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00102-4. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
6
Impact of Pharmacist-Led Diabetes Self-Care Education on Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in Pakistan: A Randomized Controlled Trial.药剂师主导的糖尿病自我护理教育对巴基斯坦2型糖尿病患者的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Feb 9;13:754999. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.754999. eCollection 2022.
7
The Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Self-Efficacy-Focused Structured Education Program for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Mainland China Setting.中国内地 2 型糖尿病患者以自我效能为焦点的结构化教育方案的成本效果分析。
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 9;9:767123. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.767123. eCollection 2021.
8
IDF diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of undiagnosed diabetes in adults for 2021.国际糖尿病联盟糖尿病地图集:2021 年全球成年人未诊断糖尿病估计数。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022 Jan;183:109118. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109118. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
9
IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045.国际糖尿病联盟(IDF)糖尿病地图集:2021 年全球、区域和国家糖尿病患病率估算值以及 2045 年预测值。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022 Jan;183:109119. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109119. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
10
Diabetes conversation map - a novel tool for diabetes management self-efficacy among type 2 diabetes patients in Pakistan: a randomized controlled trial.糖尿病对话图——一种用于管理巴基斯坦 2 型糖尿病患者自我效能的新型工具:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2020 Jun 16;20(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12902-020-00572-x.