University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, SC, USA.
Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241273148. doi: 10.1177/00469580241273148.
This study aims to examine the association between provider attributes, including network (patient panel size, degree-number of peer connections, and community size- number of a closely connected group of peers) and individual attributes (travel distance, specialties, and rural practice), and a predominant (most visited) provider.
This study utilized South Carolina's Medicaid claims data during 2014 to 2018, focusing on live births in hospitals. Samples were limited to pregnant women continuously enrolled in Medicaid throughout pregnancy. Predominant providers (total = 2153) were identified for 29 569 pregnancies. Network analyses involved 5520 providers, comprising 3667 antenatal care (ANC) providers and 1853 non-ANC providers. A Cartesian product (n = 45 929 845) combined five annual provider lists with all included pregnancies. Logistic regressions with repeated measures were applied to this retrospective case-control study.
The results demonstrated that a medium or large degree were associated with being a predominant provider if the community size was medium or large. A predominant provider was more likely to be located near, rather than far from, the served woman, and in rural areas rather than urban ones. They were also more likely to be specialists, midwives, and nurse practitioners than primary care physicians.
The results suggest that both individual and network attributes were significantly associated with being a predominant provider. Policies aimed at addressing access issues for antenatal care should consider both the individual and network attributes of providers, as providers may not be able to alter their individual attributes but can always optimize their social network.
本研究旨在探讨提供者属性(包括网络属性[患者人数、同行连接度和社区大小-紧密连接的同行群体数量]和个体属性[旅行距离、专业和农村执业])与主要(就诊最多)提供者之间的关联。
本研究利用了南卡罗来纳州 2014 年至 2018 年的医疗补助索赔数据,重点关注医院中的活产。样本仅限于在整个孕期持续参加医疗补助的孕妇。共确定了 29569 例妊娠的 2153 名主要提供者。网络分析涉及 5520 名提供者,包括 3667 名产前护理(ANC)提供者和 1853 名非 ANC 提供者。一个笛卡尔积(n=45929845)将五年的提供者名单与所有纳入的妊娠结合起来。该回顾性病例对照研究采用重复测量的逻辑回归。
结果表明,如果社区规模中等或较大,则中等或较大的程度与成为主要提供者相关。主要提供者更有可能位于服务妇女的附近,而不是远离,并且位于农村地区而不是城市地区。他们也更有可能是专科医生、助产士和执业护士,而不是初级保健医生。
结果表明,个体和网络属性都与成为主要提供者显著相关。旨在解决产前护理获取问题的政策应考虑提供者的个体和网络属性,因为提供者可能无法改变其个体属性,但始终可以优化其社交网络。