Pereira Tiago V, Saadat Pakeezah, Bobos Pavlos, Iskander Samir M, Bodmer Nicolas S, Rudnicki Martina, Dan Kiyomoto Henry, Montezuma Thais, Almeida Matheus O, Bansal Rishi, Cheng Pai-Shan, Busse Jason W, Sutton Alex J, Tugwell Peter, Hawker Gillian A, Jüni Peter, da Costa Bruno R
Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit (CTSU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2025 Feb;33(2):207-217. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2024.08.014. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
To quantify the effectiveness and safety of intra-articular interventions for knee and hip osteoarthritis (OA) through a systematic review and Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis.
We searched CENTRAL and regulatory agency websites (inception-2023) for large, English-language, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (≥100 patients/group) examining any intra-articular intervention.
pain intensity.
physical function and safety outcomes. Pain and function outcomes were analyzed at 2, 6, 12, 24, and 52 weeks post-randomization, and presented as standardized mean differences (SMDs) (95% credible intervals, 95% CrI). The prespecified minimal clinically important between-group difference (MID) was -0.37 SMD. Safety outcomes were presented as odds ratios (OR) (95% CrI).
Among 57 RCTs (22,795 participants) examining 18 intra-articular interventions, usual care or placebo, treatment effects were larger in 35 high-risk-of-bias trials than in 22 low/unclear-risk-of-bias trials. In the main analysis (excluding high-risk-of-bias trials), triamcinolone had the highest probabilities of reaching the MID at weeks 2 and 6 (75.3% and 90%, respectively) with corresponding SMDs of -0.48 (95% CrI,-0.85 to -0.10) and -0.53 (95% CrI,-0.79 to -0.27) compared to placebo (1 trial). The complex homeopathic products Tr14/Ze14 showed therapeutic potential at week 6 compared to placebo (SMD:-0.42, 95% CrI,-0.71 to -0.11, 63.5% probability of reaching the MID, 1 trial). Hyaluronic acid had no effect on pain (SMD:-0.04, 95% CrI,-0.19 to 0.11, 11 trials) but a higher risk of dropouts due to adverse events (OR: 2.01, 95% CrI,1.08 to 3.77) and serious adverse events (OR: 1.86, 95% CrI, 1.16 to 3.03) than placebo.
Triamcinolone had the highest probabilities to have a treatment effect beyond the MID at weeks 2-6. Large RCTs with lower risk of bias indicate that the effects of 16 intra-articular interventions in knee or hip OA were smaller than the MID, and that most were consistent with placebo effects. Lack of evidence of long-term effectiveness underscores the need for further research beyond 24 weeks.
通过系统评价和贝叶斯随机效应网络荟萃分析,量化关节内干预治疗膝关节和髋关节骨关节炎(OA)的有效性和安全性。
我们检索了CENTRAL和监管机构网站(从创建到2023年),以查找大型英文随机对照试验(RCT)(每组≥100例患者),这些试验考察了任何关节内干预措施。
疼痛强度。
身体功能和安全性结局。在随机分组后2、6、12、24和52周分析疼痛和功能结局,并以标准化均数差(SMD)(95%可信区间,95%CrI)表示。预先设定的组间最小临床重要差异(MID)为-0.37 SMD。安全性结局以比值比(OR)(95%CrI)表示。
在考察18种关节内干预措施、常规护理或安慰剂的57项RCT(22795名参与者)中,35项高偏倚风险试验的治疗效果大于22项低/不明确偏倚风险试验。在主要分析(排除高偏倚风险试验)中,曲安奈德在第2周和第6周达到MID的概率最高(分别为75.3%和90%),与安慰剂相比(1项试验),相应的SMD分别为-0.48(95%CrI,-0.85至-0.10)和-0.53(95%CrI,-0.79至-0.27)。与安慰剂相比(1项试验),复方顺势疗法产品Tr14/Ze14在第6周显示出治疗潜力(SMD:-0.42,95%CrI,-0.71至-0.11,达到MID的概率为63.5%)。透明质酸对疼痛无影响(SMD:-0.04,95%CrI,-0.19至0.11,11项试验),但因不良事件导致退出的风险高于安慰剂(OR:2.01,95%CrI,1.08至3.77),严重不良事件的风险也高于安慰剂(OR:1.86,95%CrI,1.16至3.03)。
曲安奈德在第2至6周具有高于MID的治疗效果的概率最高。偏倚风险较低的大型RCT表明,16种关节内干预措施对膝关节或髋关节OA的疗效小于MID,且大多数与安慰剂效应一致。缺乏长期有效性的证据凸显了24周以上进一步研究的必要性。