Department of Applied Disability Studies, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, Canada.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2024;57(4):859-878. doi: 10.1002/jaba.2912. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
Inappropriate mealtime behavior (IMB) is a type of feeding challenge within the broader class of food refusal. The purpose of this study was to critically analyze the efficacy of interventions for the treatment of IMB through a meta-analysis of research using single-case experimental designs. We examined the extent to which different interventions resulted in decreases in IMB while also producing increases in food acceptance. This meta-analysis was also used to examine the efficiency of different interventions in achieving clinical significance. We identified 38 studies involving 266 cases in which IMB was treated with a behavioral intervention. The results indicated interventions that combined escape extinction and non-escape extinction had greater effect sizes for both reducing IMB and increasing food acceptance than either escape extinction alone or non-escape extinction alone. However, interventions that included escape extinction were slightly less efficient at decreasing IMB than were interventions that did not include escape extinction. We discuss the implications of these findings and provide recommendations for future research.
不适当的进餐行为(IMB)是更广泛的拒食行为中的一种喂养挑战。本研究的目的是通过对使用单一案例实验设计的研究进行荟萃分析,批判性地分析干预措施治疗 IMB 的疗效。我们考察了不同干预措施在减少 IMB 的同时增加食物接受度的程度。该荟萃分析还用于检查不同干预措施实现临床意义的效率。我们确定了 38 项研究,涉及 266 例接受行为干预治疗的 IMB 病例。结果表明,对于减少 IMB 和增加食物接受度,结合逃避性消退和非逃避性消退的干预措施比单独使用逃避性消退或非逃避性消退具有更大的效果量。然而,包含逃避性消退的干预措施在减少 IMB 方面的效率略低于不包含逃避性消退的干预措施。我们讨论了这些发现的意义,并为未来的研究提供了建议。