• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

深化基于价值条件下帕金森病患者的决策过程:一项比较研究。

Deepening the decisional processes under value-based conditions in patients affected by Parkinson's disease: A comparative study.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli, 1, 20123, Milan, Italy.

Department of Diagnostics and Technology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2024 Dec;24(6):1167-1185. doi: 10.3758/s13415-024-01211-x. Epub 2024 Sep 12.

DOI:10.3758/s13415-024-01211-x
PMID:39266937
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11525292/
Abstract

Patients affected by Parkinson's disease (PD) display a tendency toward making risky choices in value-based conditions. Possible causes may encompass the pathophysiologic characteristics of PD that affect neural structures pivotal for decision making (DM) and the dopaminergic medications that may bias choices. Nevertheless, excluding patients with concurrent impulse control disorders, results are few and mixed. Conversely, other factors, such as individual differences (e.g., emotional state, impulsivity, consideration for future consequences) and cognitive functioning, in particular executive functions (EFs), are involved, even though few studies investigated their possible role. The present study investigated (1) the differences in value-based DM between 33 patients with PD without impulse control disorders and 33 matched healthy controls, and (2) the relationships among decisional performances, EFs, and individual differences in a group of 42 patients with PD who regularly undertake dopaminergic medications. All participants underwent an individual assessment to investigate value-based DM, cognitive abilities, and individual differences associated with DM. Nonparametric analyses showed the presence of riskier decisions in patients compared with healthy controls, depending on the characteristics of the decisional situation. Moreover, parameters of the decisional tasks involving the number of risky choices were significantly related to the posology of dopaminergic medications, EFs, and individual differences. Findings were discussed, highlighting possible clinical implications.

摘要

帕金森病 (PD) 患者在基于价值的条件下表现出冒险选择的倾向。可能的原因包括影响决策 (DM) 关键神经结构的 PD 病理生理特征和可能影响选择的多巴胺能药物。然而,排除伴有冲动控制障碍的患者后,结果很少且不一致。相反,其他因素,如个体差异(例如情绪状态、冲动性、对未来后果的考虑)和认知功能,特别是执行功能 (EFs),也会产生影响,尽管很少有研究调查它们的可能作用。本研究调查了 (1) 33 名无冲动控制障碍的 PD 患者和 33 名匹配的健康对照组之间基于价值的 DM 的差异,以及 (2) 在一组定期接受多巴胺能药物治疗的 42 名 PD 患者中,决策表现、EFs 和与 DM 相关的个体差异之间的关系。所有参与者都接受了个体评估,以调查基于价值的 DM、认知能力和与 DM 相关的个体差异。非参数分析显示,与健康对照组相比,患者的决策更具风险,这取决于决策情况的特点。此外,涉及风险选择数量的决策任务的参数与多巴胺能药物的用量、EFs 和个体差异显著相关。讨论了研究结果,强调了可能的临床意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df1f/11525292/caaa7a5dbd58/13415_2024_1211_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df1f/11525292/11ede9e2501d/13415_2024_1211_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df1f/11525292/caaa7a5dbd58/13415_2024_1211_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df1f/11525292/11ede9e2501d/13415_2024_1211_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df1f/11525292/caaa7a5dbd58/13415_2024_1211_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Deepening the decisional processes under value-based conditions in patients affected by Parkinson's disease: A comparative study.深化基于价值条件下帕金森病患者的决策过程:一项比较研究。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2024 Dec;24(6):1167-1185. doi: 10.3758/s13415-024-01211-x. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
2
Decision-making under ambiguity and risk and executive functions in Parkinson's disease patients: A scoping review of the studies investigating the Iowa Gambling Task and the Game of Dice.帕金森病患者在不确定和风险下的决策以及执行功能:对使用 Iowa 赌博任务和骰子游戏进行研究的综述。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2023 Oct;23(5):1225-1243. doi: 10.3758/s13415-023-01106-3. Epub 2023 May 17.
3
Dissociation of decision-making under ambiguity and decision-making under risk in patients with Parkinson's disease: a neuropsychological and psychophysiological study.帕金森病患者在模糊情境下的决策与风险情境下的决策的分离:一项神经心理学和心理生理学研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Nov;47(13):2882-90. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.06.014. Epub 2009 Jun 21.
4
Dissociation between decision making under ambiguity and risk in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy.青少年肌阵挛癫痫患者在模糊决策和风险下的分离。
Epilepsy Behav. 2019 Dec;101(Pt A):106548. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106548. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
5
Iowa gambling task in Parkinson's disease.帕金森病中的爱荷华赌博任务。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2011 Apr;33(4):395-409. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2010.524150. Epub 2010 Dec 6.
6
Applied strategy in the Iowa Gambling Task: Comparison of individuals with Parkinson's disease to healthy controls.应用策略在爱荷华赌博任务中的应用:帕金森病患者与健康对照者的比较。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2020 Jul;42(5):425-435. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2020.1749237. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
7
Decision making in Parkinson's disease: Analysis of behavioral and physiological patterns in the Iowa gambling task.帕金森病中的决策制定:爱荷华赌博任务中行为和生理模式的分析。
Mov Disord. 2008 Mar 15;23(4):547-52. doi: 10.1002/mds.21865.
8
Decision making in Parkinson's disease: An analysis of the studies using the Iowa Gambling Task.帕金森病决策:基于 Iowa 赌博任务的研究分析。
Eur J Neurosci. 2021 Nov;54(10):7513-7549. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15497. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
9
Decision-making, reward-seeking behaviors and dopamine agonist therapy in restless legs syndrome.不宁腿综合征的决策、觅药行为与多巴胺激动剂治疗。
Sleep. 2013 Oct 1;36(10):1501-7. doi: 10.5665/sleep.3044.
10
Executive functioning and risk-taking behavior in Parkinson's disease patients with impulse control disorders.患有冲动控制障碍的帕金森病患者的执行功能和冒险行为
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2016 Jun;123(6):573-81. doi: 10.1007/s00702-016-1549-y. Epub 2016 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting Cognitive Decline in Parkinson's Disease Using Artificial Neural Networks: An Explainable AI Approach.使用人工神经网络预测帕金森病的认知衰退:一种可解释的人工智能方法。
Brain Sci. 2025 Jul 23;15(8):782. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15080782.
2
The effect of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on the Iowa Gambling Task: a scoping review.经颅直流电刺激对爱荷华赌博任务的影响:一项范围综述
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 18;15:1454796. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1454796. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Decision-making under ambiguity and risk and executive functions in Parkinson's disease patients: A scoping review of the studies investigating the Iowa Gambling Task and the Game of Dice.帕金森病患者在不确定和风险下的决策以及执行功能:对使用 Iowa 赌博任务和骰子游戏进行研究的综述。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2023 Oct;23(5):1225-1243. doi: 10.3758/s13415-023-01106-3. Epub 2023 May 17.
2
Executive Functions in Decision Making under Ambiguity and Risk in Healthy Adults: A Scoping Review Adopting the Hot and Cold Executive Functions Perspective.健康成年人在模糊性和风险下决策中的执行功能:采用冷热执行功能视角的范围综述
Brain Sci. 2022 Oct 2;12(10):1335. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12101335.
3
Role of dopamine and clinical heterogeneity in cognitive dysfunction in Parkinson's disease.
多巴胺在帕金森病认知功能障碍中的作用及临床异质性。
Prog Brain Res. 2022;269(1):309-343. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2022.01.012. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
4
Decision making in Parkinson's disease: An analysis of the studies using the Iowa Gambling Task.帕金森病决策:基于 Iowa 赌博任务的研究分析。
Eur J Neurosci. 2021 Nov;54(10):7513-7549. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15497. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
5
Is there a Neurobiological Rationale for the Utility of the Iowa Gambling Task in Parkinson's Disease?在帕金森病中,使用 Iowa 赌博任务是否有神经生物学依据?
J Parkinsons Dis. 2021;11(2):405-419. doi: 10.3233/JPD-202449.
6
Levodopa Equivalent Dose Conversion Factors: An Updated Proposal Including Opicapone and Safinamide.左旋多巴等效剂量转换因子:一项包括奥匹卡朋和沙芬酰胺的更新提案。
Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2020 Mar 16;7(3):343-345. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12921. eCollection 2020 Apr.
7
Concordance of Mini-Mental State Examination, Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Parkinson Neuropsychometric Dementia Assessment in the classification of cognitive performance in Parkinson's disease.简易精神状态检查表、蒙特利尔认知评估量表与帕金森病神经心理痴呆评估量表在帕金森病认知功能分类中的一致性
J Neurol Sci. 2020 May 15;412:116735. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2020.116735. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
8
Parkinson disease.帕金森病。
Eur J Neurol. 2020 Jan;27(1):27-42. doi: 10.1111/ene.14108. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
9
Dopaminergic medication reduces striatal sensitivity to negative outcomes in Parkinson's disease.多巴胺药物可降低帕金森病患者纹状体对负面结果的敏感性。
Brain. 2019 Nov 1;142(11):3605-3620. doi: 10.1093/brain/awz276.
10
Risky decision-making predicts dopamine release dynamics in nucleus accumbens shell.冒险决策预测伏隔核壳部多巴胺释放动力学。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2020 Jan;45(2):266-275. doi: 10.1038/s41386-019-0527-0. Epub 2019 Sep 23.