• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一线化疗±免疫治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌时基线临床病理特征的预后价值:一项回顾性队列研究

Prognostic value of baseline clinicopathological characteristics in first-line chemotherapy ± immunotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Wu Yili, Ye Jiankui, Shao Zhuowei, Rossi Antonio, Chen Yu, Li You, Wu Shibo

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, The Affiliated Lihuili Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.

Health Science Center, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2024 Aug 31;16(8):5348-5360. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-929. Epub 2024 Aug 28.

DOI:10.21037/jtd-24-929
PMID:39268133
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11388222/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The integration of chemotherapy and immunotherapy as a first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) has been adopted in clinical practice, yet the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is variable, benefiting only a fraction of patients. The current absence of reliable biomarkers for predicting treatment response and prognosis represents a significant gap in knowledge, hindering the optimization of patient stratification and treatment planning. This retrospective cohort study aims to assess the potential predictive and prognostic significance of clinicopathological baseline features in ES-SCLC patients.

METHODS

Our study retrospectively analyzed the data of consecutive patients with ES-SCLC treated with first-line etoposide plus platinum chemotherapy ± immunotherapy at The Affiliated Lihuili Hospital of Ningbo University from April 2017 to April 2023. Data on clinical information, serum laboratory indicators, pathological immunohistochemical markers, and progression-free survival (PFS) times were collected. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were employed to determine whether these indicators could serve as independent prognostic factors for PFS. Further, potential predictive markers for treatment efficacy were identified using a Cox regression model that incorporated an interaction term between treatment modality and the indicator.

RESULTS

A total of 121 patients with ES-SCLC were enrolled in the study, of whom 62 received chemotherapy alone, and 59 received chemotherapy in combination with immunotherapy. Compared to chemotherapy alone, the addition of immunotherapy to first-line chemotherapy significantly extended the PFS time [P<0.001; hazard ratio (HR) =0.42; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.28, 0.64] of the ES-SCLC patients. The multivariate analysis revealed that an immunochemotherapy regimen (P<0.001, HR =0.40; 95% CI: 0.24, 0.68), a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) level of >1.8 mmol/L (P=0.02; HR =0.41; 95% CI: 0.20, 0.85) were independent prognostic factors of favorable PFS in the first-line treatment of all ES-SCLC, while a lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level of >273 U/L (P=0.04; HR =1.78; 95% CI: 1.03, 3.07), a neuron-specific enolase (NSE) concentration of >102.6 ng/mL (P=0.009; HR =6.49; 95% CI: 1.60, 26.32), an apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1) concentration of >0.9 g/L (P<0.001; HR =4.15; 95% CI: 1.98, 8.71), and an apolipoprotein B (ApoB) concentration of >0.8 g/L (P=0.002; HR =2.24; 95% CI: 1.34, 3.75) were independent prognostic factors of poorer PFS. Further, the interaction effect analysis demonstrated that an LDL level of >1.8 mmol/L and the absence of bone metastasis were potential predictors of an improved response to ICI therapy compared to chemotherapy alone.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed the survival benefit of receiving a chemoimmunotherapy regimen as the first-line treatment in a real-world scenario. It also suggests the prognostic significance of pre-treatment LDL, LDH, NSE, ApoA1, and ApoB with optimal cut-off values in the first-line treatment of all ES-SCLC, and the potential utility of baseline LDL level or the presence of bone metastasis in guiding first-line treatment strategies.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/310f/11388222/f2897c120284/jtd-16-08-5348-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/310f/11388222/0aac711981ee/jtd-16-08-5348-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/310f/11388222/f2897c120284/jtd-16-08-5348-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/310f/11388222/0aac711981ee/jtd-16-08-5348-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/310f/11388222/f2897c120284/jtd-16-08-5348-f2.jpg
摘要

背景

化疗与免疫疗法联合作为广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)的一线治疗方案已应用于临床实践,但患者对免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)的反应存在差异,仅有部分患者受益。目前缺乏可靠的生物标志物来预测治疗反应和预后,这是知识上的重大空白,阻碍了患者分层和治疗计划的优化。这项回顾性队列研究旨在评估ES-SCLC患者临床病理基线特征的潜在预测和预后意义。

方法

我们的研究回顾性分析了2017年4月至2023年4月在宁波大学附属李惠利医院接受一线依托泊苷加铂类化疗±免疫疗法治疗的连续性ES-SCLC患者的数据。收集了临床信息、血清实验室指标、病理免疫组化标志物及无进展生存期(PFS)时间的数据。采用单因素和多因素Cox回归分析来确定这些指标是否可作为PFS的独立预后因素。此外,使用纳入治疗方式与指标之间交互项的Cox回归模型确定治疗疗效的潜在预测标志物。

结果

本研究共纳入121例ES-SCLC患者,其中62例仅接受化疗,59例接受化疗联合免疫疗法。与单纯化疗相比,一线化疗联合免疫疗法显著延长了ES-SCLC患者的PFS时间[P<0.001;风险比(HR)=0.42;95%置信区间(CI):0.28,0.64]。多因素分析显示,免疫化疗方案(P<0.001,HR =0.40;95%CI:0.24,0.68)、低密度脂蛋白(LDL)水平>1.8 mmol/L(P=0.02;HR =0.41;95%CI:0.20,0.85)是所有ES-SCLC一线治疗中PFS良好的独立预后因素,而乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)水平>273 U/L(P=0.04;HR =1.78;95%CI:1.03,3.07)、神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)浓度>102.6 ng/mL(P=0.009;HR =6.49;95%CI:1.60,26.32)、载脂蛋白A1(ApoA1)浓度>0.9 g/L(P<0.001;HR =4.15;95%CI:1.98,8.71)和载脂蛋白B(ApoB)浓度>0.8 g/L(P=0.002;HR =2.24;95%CI:1.34,3.75)是PFS较差的独立预后因素。此外,交互效应分析表明,LDL水平>1.8 mmol/L且无骨转移是与单纯化疗相比对ICI治疗反应改善的潜在预测因素。

结论

本研究显示了在真实世界中接受化疗免疫疗法作为一线治疗的生存获益。还提示了治疗前LDL、LDH、NSE、ApoA1和ApoB在所有ES-SCLC一线治疗中具有最佳临界值时的预后意义,以及基线LDL水平或骨转移情况在指导一线治疗策略方面的潜在作用。

相似文献

1
Prognostic value of baseline clinicopathological characteristics in first-line chemotherapy ± immunotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study.一线化疗±免疫治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌时基线临床病理特征的预后价值:一项回顾性队列研究
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Aug 31;16(8):5348-5360. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-929. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
2
Construction of a prognostic model for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer patients undergoing immune therapy in northernmost China and prediction of treatment efficacy based on response status at different time points.构建中国最北部广泛期小细胞肺癌患者接受免疫治疗的预后模型,并基于不同时间点的反应状态预测治疗效果。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024 May 15;150(5):255. doi: 10.1007/s00432-024-05767-6.
3
Efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PD-1/PD-L1 抑制剂联合化疗与单纯化疗作为广泛期小细胞肺癌一线治疗的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Thorac Cancer. 2020 Dec;11(12):3536-3546. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13698. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
4
Efficacy and safety of first-line PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors in limited-stage small cell lung cancer: a multicenter propensity score matched retrospective study.一线程序性死亡配体1/程序性死亡受体1抑制剂治疗局限期小细胞肺癌的疗效与安全性:一项多中心倾向评分匹配的回顾性研究
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2024 Mar 29;13(3):526-539. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-24-24. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
5
Assessing treatment outcomes of chemoimmunotherapy in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: an integrated clinical and radiomics approach.评估广泛期小细胞肺癌化疗免疫治疗的治疗结局:一种综合临床和放射组学方法。
J Immunother Cancer. 2023 Sep;11(9). doi: 10.1136/jitc-2023-007492.
6
Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 inhibitor versus anti-PD-L1 inhibitor in first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.抗 PD-1 抑制剂与抗 PD-L1 抑制剂在广泛期小细胞肺癌一线治疗中的疗效和安全性:一项多中心回顾性研究。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Jan 17;24(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-11833-6.
7
Efficacy and safety of thoracic radiotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer patients receiving first-line immunotherapy plus chemotherapy: a propensity score matched multicentre retrospective analysis.一线免疫治疗联合化疗的广泛期小细胞肺癌患者接受胸部放疗的疗效和安全性:一项倾向评分匹配的多中心回顾性分析。
Radiat Oncol. 2024 Feb 27;19(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13014-024-02420-x.
8
Comparison of efficacy and safety between PD-1 inhibitors and PD-L1 inhibitors plus platinum-etoposide as first-line treatment for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a multicenter, real-world analysis.PD-1 抑制剂与 PD-L1 抑制剂联合铂类依托泊苷一线治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌的疗效和安全性比较:一项多中心真实世界分析。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Dec 6;23(1):1196. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11709-1.
9
Value of pretreatment serum lactate dehydrogenase as a prognostic and predictive factor for small-cell lung cancer patients treated with first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy.一线含铂化疗治疗的小细胞肺癌患者,治疗前血清乳酸脱氢酶水平作为预后和预测因素的价值。
Thorac Cancer. 2021 Dec;12(23):3101-3109. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13581. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
10
Real-World Analysis of Clinical Characteristics and Survival Outcomes in Patients With Extensive-Stage SCLC Treated With First-Line Chemoimmunotherapy.一线化疗免疫疗法治疗广泛期小细胞肺癌患者的临床特征与生存结局的真实世界分析
JTO Clin Res Rep. 2023 Jun 27;4(8):100544. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2023.100544. eCollection 2023 Aug.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Combined with Chemotherapy in Taiwanese Patients with Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer.免疫检查点抑制剂联合化疗在台湾广泛期小细胞肺癌患者中的真实世界有效性和安全性
Curr Oncol. 2025 Aug 19;32(8):472. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32080472.
2
LTF as a Potential Predictive Biomarker for Durable Benefit From First-Line Chemo-Immunotherapy in Small Cell Lung Cancer.乳铁传递蛋白作为小细胞肺癌一线化疗免疫治疗持久获益的潜在预测生物标志物
Cancer Sci. 2025 Jun;116(6):1522-1536. doi: 10.1111/cas.70049. Epub 2025 Mar 17.

本文引用的文献

1
A retrospective analysis of prognostic factors and treatment choices in small cell lung cancer with liver metastasis.小细胞肺癌肝转移预后因素及治疗选择的回顾性分析
J Thorac Dis. 2023 Dec 30;15(12):6776-6787. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-1294. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
2
Lipid-lowering drugs affect lung cancer risk via sphingolipid metabolism: a drug-target Mendelian randomization study.降脂药物通过鞘脂代谢影响肺癌风险:一项药物靶点孟德尔随机化研究。
Front Genet. 2023 Nov 16;14:1269291. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1269291. eCollection 2023.
3
Lipids, cholesterols, statins and liver cancer: a Mendelian randomization study.
脂质、胆固醇、他汀类药物与肝癌:一项孟德尔随机化研究
Front Oncol. 2023 Sep 6;13:1251873. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1251873. eCollection 2023.
4
Analysis of Baseline Serum Lipid Profile for Predicting Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer.分析基线血脂谱以预测广泛期小细胞肺癌患者的临床结局
Cancer Manag Res. 2023 Jul 27;15:773-783. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S418487. eCollection 2023.
5
Emerging Strategies for the Treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Review.小细胞肺癌治疗的新兴策略:综述
JAMA Oncol. 2023 Mar 1;9(3):419-429. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.5631.
6
A 2022 Update on Extensive Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC).2022年广泛期小细胞肺癌(SCLC)最新进展
J Cancer. 2022 Jul 18;13(9):2945-2953. doi: 10.7150/jca.75622. eCollection 2022.
7
Prognostic significance of procalcitonin in small cell lung cancer.降钙素原在小细胞肺癌中的预后意义。
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2022 Jan;11(1):43-52. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-21-838.
8
Clinical features and prognostic factors of combined small cell lung cancer: development and validation of a nomogram based on the SEER database.小细胞肺癌合并症的临床特征及预后因素:基于监测、流行病学与最终结果(SEER)数据库的列线图的开发与验证
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021 Nov;10(11):4250-4265. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-21-804.
9
Value of pretreatment serum lactate dehydrogenase as a prognostic and predictive factor for small-cell lung cancer patients treated with first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy.一线含铂化疗治疗的小细胞肺癌患者,治疗前血清乳酸脱氢酶水平作为预后和预测因素的价值。
Thorac Cancer. 2021 Dec;12(23):3101-3109. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13581. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
10
Combining Lactate Dehydrogenase and Fibrinogen: Potential Factors to Predict Therapeutic Efficacy and Prognosis of Patients with Small-Cell Lung Cancer.联合乳酸脱氢酶和纤维蛋白原:预测小细胞肺癌患者治疗疗效和预后的潜在因素
Cancer Manag Res. 2021 May 31;13:4299-4307. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S300153. eCollection 2021.