Wu Yili, Ye Jiankui, Shao Zhuowei, Rossi Antonio, Chen Yu, Li You, Wu Shibo
Department of Respiratory Medicine, The Affiliated Lihuili Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Health Science Center, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Aug 31;16(8):5348-5360. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-929. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
The integration of chemotherapy and immunotherapy as a first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) has been adopted in clinical practice, yet the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is variable, benefiting only a fraction of patients. The current absence of reliable biomarkers for predicting treatment response and prognosis represents a significant gap in knowledge, hindering the optimization of patient stratification and treatment planning. This retrospective cohort study aims to assess the potential predictive and prognostic significance of clinicopathological baseline features in ES-SCLC patients.
Our study retrospectively analyzed the data of consecutive patients with ES-SCLC treated with first-line etoposide plus platinum chemotherapy ± immunotherapy at The Affiliated Lihuili Hospital of Ningbo University from April 2017 to April 2023. Data on clinical information, serum laboratory indicators, pathological immunohistochemical markers, and progression-free survival (PFS) times were collected. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were employed to determine whether these indicators could serve as independent prognostic factors for PFS. Further, potential predictive markers for treatment efficacy were identified using a Cox regression model that incorporated an interaction term between treatment modality and the indicator.
A total of 121 patients with ES-SCLC were enrolled in the study, of whom 62 received chemotherapy alone, and 59 received chemotherapy in combination with immunotherapy. Compared to chemotherapy alone, the addition of immunotherapy to first-line chemotherapy significantly extended the PFS time [P<0.001; hazard ratio (HR) =0.42; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.28, 0.64] of the ES-SCLC patients. The multivariate analysis revealed that an immunochemotherapy regimen (P<0.001, HR =0.40; 95% CI: 0.24, 0.68), a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) level of >1.8 mmol/L (P=0.02; HR =0.41; 95% CI: 0.20, 0.85) were independent prognostic factors of favorable PFS in the first-line treatment of all ES-SCLC, while a lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level of >273 U/L (P=0.04; HR =1.78; 95% CI: 1.03, 3.07), a neuron-specific enolase (NSE) concentration of >102.6 ng/mL (P=0.009; HR =6.49; 95% CI: 1.60, 26.32), an apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1) concentration of >0.9 g/L (P<0.001; HR =4.15; 95% CI: 1.98, 8.71), and an apolipoprotein B (ApoB) concentration of >0.8 g/L (P=0.002; HR =2.24; 95% CI: 1.34, 3.75) were independent prognostic factors of poorer PFS. Further, the interaction effect analysis demonstrated that an LDL level of >1.8 mmol/L and the absence of bone metastasis were potential predictors of an improved response to ICI therapy compared to chemotherapy alone.
This study showed the survival benefit of receiving a chemoimmunotherapy regimen as the first-line treatment in a real-world scenario. It also suggests the prognostic significance of pre-treatment LDL, LDH, NSE, ApoA1, and ApoB with optimal cut-off values in the first-line treatment of all ES-SCLC, and the potential utility of baseline LDL level or the presence of bone metastasis in guiding first-line treatment strategies.
化疗与免疫疗法联合作为广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)的一线治疗方案已应用于临床实践,但患者对免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)的反应存在差异,仅有部分患者受益。目前缺乏可靠的生物标志物来预测治疗反应和预后,这是知识上的重大空白,阻碍了患者分层和治疗计划的优化。这项回顾性队列研究旨在评估ES-SCLC患者临床病理基线特征的潜在预测和预后意义。
我们的研究回顾性分析了2017年4月至2023年4月在宁波大学附属李惠利医院接受一线依托泊苷加铂类化疗±免疫疗法治疗的连续性ES-SCLC患者的数据。收集了临床信息、血清实验室指标、病理免疫组化标志物及无进展生存期(PFS)时间的数据。采用单因素和多因素Cox回归分析来确定这些指标是否可作为PFS的独立预后因素。此外,使用纳入治疗方式与指标之间交互项的Cox回归模型确定治疗疗效的潜在预测标志物。
本研究共纳入121例ES-SCLC患者,其中62例仅接受化疗,59例接受化疗联合免疫疗法。与单纯化疗相比,一线化疗联合免疫疗法显著延长了ES-SCLC患者的PFS时间[P<0.001;风险比(HR)=0.42;95%置信区间(CI):0.28,0.64]。多因素分析显示,免疫化疗方案(P<0.001,HR =0.40;95%CI:0.24,0.68)、低密度脂蛋白(LDL)水平>1.8 mmol/L(P=0.02;HR =0.41;95%CI:0.20,0.85)是所有ES-SCLC一线治疗中PFS良好的独立预后因素,而乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)水平>273 U/L(P=0.04;HR =1.78;95%CI:1.03,3.07)、神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)浓度>102.6 ng/mL(P=0.009;HR =6.49;95%CI:1.60,26.32)、载脂蛋白A1(ApoA1)浓度>0.9 g/L(P<0.001;HR =4.15;95%CI:1.98,8.71)和载脂蛋白B(ApoB)浓度>0.8 g/L(P=0.002;HR =2.24;95%CI:1.34,3.75)是PFS较差的独立预后因素。此外,交互效应分析表明,LDL水平>1.8 mmol/L且无骨转移是与单纯化疗相比对ICI治疗反应改善的潜在预测因素。
本研究显示了在真实世界中接受化疗免疫疗法作为一线治疗的生存获益。还提示了治疗前LDL、LDH、NSE、ApoA1和ApoB在所有ES-SCLC一线治疗中具有最佳临界值时的预后意义,以及基线LDL水平或骨转移情况在指导一线治疗策略方面的潜在作用。