Yang Seokhun, Hwang Doyeon, Sakai Koshiro, Mizukami Takuya, Leipsic Jonathon, Belmonte Marta, Sonck Jeroen, Nørgaard Bjarne L, Otake Hiromasa, Ko Brian, Maeng Michael, Møller Jensen Jesper, Buytaert Dimitri, Munhoz Daniel, Andreini Daniele, Ohashi Hirofumi, Shinke Toshiro, Taylor Charles A, Barbato Emanuele, De Bruyne Bernard, Collet Carlos, Koo Bon-Kwon
Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University of College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Cardiovascular Center Aalst, OLV Clinic, Aalst, Belgium; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Feb;18(2):195-206. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2024.07.021. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
Vulnerable plaque presents prognostic implications in addition to functional significance.
The aim of this study was to identify relevant features of vulnerable plaque in functionally significant lesions.
In this multicenter, prospective study conducted across 5 countries, including patients who had invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) ≤0.80, a total of 95 patients with available pullback pressure gradient (PPG) and plaque analysis on coronary computed tomographic angiography and optical coherence tomography were analyzed. Vulnerable plaque was defined as the presence of plaque rupture or thin-cap fibroatheroma on optical coherence tomography. Among the 25 clinical characteristics, invasive angiographic findings, physiological indexes, and coronary computed tomographic angiographic findings, significant predictors of vulnerable plaque were identified.
Mean percentage diameter stenosis, FFR, and PPG were 77.8% ± 14.6%, 0.66 ± 0.13, and 0.65 ± 0.13, respectively. Vulnerable plaque was present in 53 lesions (55.8%). PPG and FFR were identified as significant predictors of vulnerable plaque (P < 0.05 for all). PPG >0.65 and FFR ≤0.70 were significantly related to a higher probability of vulnerable plaque after adjustment for each other (OR: 6.75 [95% CI: 2.39-19.1]; P < 0.001] for PPG >0.65; OR: 4.61 [95% CI: 1.66-12.8]; P = 0.003 for FFR ≤0.70). When categorizing lesions according to combined PPG >0.65 and FFR ≤0.70, the prevalence of vulnerable plaque was 20.0%, 57.1%, 66.7%, and 88.2% in the order of PPG ≤0.65 and FFR >0.70, PPG ≤0.65 and FFR ≤0.70, PPG >0.65 and FFR >0.70, and PPG >0.65 and FFR ≤0.70 (P for trend < 0.001), respectively.
Among low-FFR lesions, the presence of vulnerable plaque can be predicted by PPG combined with FFR without additional anatomical or plaque characteristics. (Precise Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Plan [P3] Study; NCT03782688).
易损斑块除了具有功能学意义外,还具有预后意义。
本研究旨在确定功能学意义显著的病变中易损斑块的相关特征。
在这项横跨5个国家的多中心前瞻性研究中,纳入有创血流储备分数(FFR)≤0.80的患者,对95例在冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术(CTA)和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)上有可用回撤压力梯度(PPG)和斑块分析的患者进行分析。易损斑块定义为在光学相干断层扫描上存在斑块破裂或薄帽纤维粥样斑块。在25项临床特征、有创血管造影结果、生理指标和冠状动脉CTA结果中,确定易损斑块的显著预测因素。
平均直径狭窄百分比、FFR和PPG分别为77.8%±14.6%、0.66±0.13和0.65±0.13。53处病变(55.8%)存在易损斑块。PPG和FFR被确定为易损斑块的显著预测因素(均P<0.05)。相互校正后,PPG>0.65和FFR≤0.70与易损斑块的较高概率显著相关(PPG>0.65时,OR:6.75[95%CI:2.39-19.1];P<0.001;FFR≤0.70时,OR:4.61[95%CI:1.66-12.8];P=0.003)。根据PPG>0.65和FFR≤0.70进行病变分类时,易损斑块的患病率在PPG≤0.65且FFR>0.70、PPG≤0.65且FFR≤0.70、PPG>0.65且FFR>0.70以及PPG>0.65且FFR≤0.70的情况下依次为20.0%、57.1%、66.7%和88.2%(趋势P<0.001)。
在低FFR病变中,结合PPG与FFR可预测易损斑块的存在,无需额外的解剖或斑块特征。(精确经皮冠状动脉介入治疗计划[P3]研究;NCT03782688)