Suppr超能文献

先天性颈椎管狭窄对颈椎脊髓病患者行三节段前路颈椎间盘切除融合术治疗效果的影响:一项回顾性研究。

Impact of congenital spinal stenosis on the outcome of three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 119 South Fourth Ring Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China.

出版信息

Int Orthop. 2024 Nov;48(11):2953-2961. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06278-2. Epub 2024 Sep 13.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate whether congenital cervical spinal stenosis (CCSS) affects the outcome of three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).

METHODS

One hundred seventeen patients with CSM who underwent three-level ACDF between January 2019 and January 2023 were retrospectively examined. Patients were grouped according to presence of CCSS, which was defined as Pavlov ratio ≤ 0.75. The CCSS and no CCSS groups comprised 68 (58.1%) and 49 (41.9%) patients, respectively.

RESULTS

The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score did not significantly differ between the two groups at any postoperative time point (p > 0.05). The JOA improvement rate was lower in the CCSS group 1 month after surgery (41.7% vs. 45.5%, p < 0.05), but showed no difference at any follow-up time point after one month. Multivariate logistic regression identified preoperative age (OR = 10.639), JOA score (OR = 0.370), increased signal intensity (ISI) in the spinal cord on T2-weighted MRI (T2-WI) (Grade 1: OR = 6.135; Grade 2: OR = 29.892), and degree of spinal cord compression (30-60%: OR = 17.919; ≥60%: OR = 46.624) as independent predictors of a poor one year outcome (JOA recovery rate < 50%).

CONCLUSION

Although early JOA improvement is slower in the CCSS group, it does not affect the final neurological improvement at 1 year. Therefore, CCSS should not be considered a contraindication for three-level ACDF in patients with CSM. The main factors influencing one year outcome were preoperative age, JOA score, ISI grade, and degree of spinal cord compression.

摘要

目的

研究先天性颈椎管狭窄(CCSS)是否影响颈椎脊髓病(CSM)患者三节段前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)的疗效。

方法

回顾性分析 2019 年 1 月至 2023 年 1 月期间行三节段 ACDF 的 117 例 CSM 患者。根据是否存在 CCSS 将患者分组,CCSS 定义为 Pavlov 比值≤0.75。CCSS 组和无 CCSS 组分别有 68(58.1%)和 49(41.9%)例患者。

结果

两组患者在任何术后时间点的日本骨科协会(JOA)评分均无显著差异(p>0.05)。CCSS 组术后 1 个月 JOA 改善率较低(41.7%比 45.5%,p<0.05),但在术后 1 个月后随访的任何时间点均无差异。多因素 logistic 回归分析发现术前年龄(OR=10.639)、JOA 评分(OR=0.370)、脊髓 T2 加权磁共振成像(T2-WI)上的高信号强度(IS)(1 级:OR=6.135;2 级:OR=29.892)和脊髓压迫程度(30%-60%:OR=17.919;≥60%:OR=46.624)是术后 1 年疗效(JOA 恢复率<50%)不良的独立预测因素。

结论

尽管 CCSS 组早期 JOA 改善较慢,但并不影响 1 年时的最终神经改善。因此,CCSS 不应作为 CSM 患者行三节段 ACDF 的禁忌证。影响 1 年预后的主要因素是术前年龄、JOA 评分、IS 分级和脊髓压迫程度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验