• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为 30-39 岁女性制定乳腺癌风险评估和初级预防路径:英国初级保健提供者对初级保健作用的看法。

Development of a breast cancer risk assessment and primary prevention pathway for women aged 30-39 years: Views of UK primary care providers on the role of primary care.

机构信息

Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Research Collaboration, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Sep 13;19(9):e0308638. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308638. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0308638
PMID:39269936
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11398678/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Identifying women aged 30-39 years at increased risk of developing breast cancer would allow them to receive screening and prevention offers. For this to be feasible, the practicalities of organising risk assessment and primary prevention must be acceptable to the healthcare professionals who would be responsible for delivery. It has been proposed that primary care providers are best placed to deliver a breast cancer risk assessment and primary prevention pathway. The present study aimed to investigate a range of primary care provider's views on the development and implementation of a breast cancer risk assessment and primary prevention pathway within primary care for women aged 30-39 years.

METHODS

Twenty-five primary care providers working at general practices in either Greater Manchester or Cambridgeshire and Peterborough participated in five focus groups (n = 18) and seven individual interviews. Data were analysed thematically and organised using a framework approach.

RESULTS

Three themes were developed. Challenges with delivering a breast cancer risk assessment and primary prevention pathway within primary care highlights that primary care are willing to facilitate but not lead delivery of such a pathway given the challenges with existing workload pressures and concerns about ensuring effective clinical governance. Primary care's preferred level of involvement describes the aspects of the pathway participants thought primary care could be involved in, namely co-ordinating data collection for risk assessment and calculating and communicating risk. Requirements for primary care involvement captures the need to provide a training and education package to address deficits in knowledge prior to involvement. Additionally, the reservations primary care have about being involved in the management of women identified as being at increased risk are discussed and suggestions are provided for facilitating primary care to take on this role.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite optimism that primary care might lead a breast cancer risk assessment and primary prevention pathway, participants had a range of concerns that should be considered when developing such a pathway.

摘要

背景

识别出 30-39 岁年龄段有较高患乳腺癌风险的女性,使她们能够获得筛查和预防服务。为了实现这一目标,负责实施的医疗保健专业人员必须能够接受组织风险评估和初级预防的实际操作。有人提议,初级保健提供者最适合提供乳腺癌风险评估和初级预防途径。本研究旨在调查一系列初级保健提供者对在 30-39 岁女性的初级保健中制定和实施乳腺癌风险评估和初级预防途径的看法。

方法

在大曼彻斯特或剑桥和彼得伯勒的全科医生诊所工作的 25 名初级保健提供者参加了 5 个焦点小组(n=18)和 7 个单独访谈。使用主题分析法对数据进行分析,并使用框架方法进行组织。

结果

得出了 3 个主题。在初级保健中提供乳腺癌风险评估和初级预防途径的挑战突显了初级保健提供者愿意促进但不愿意主导该途径的实施,因为他们面临着现有工作量压力的挑战以及对确保有效临床治理的担忧。初级保健的首选参与程度描述了参与者认为初级保健可以参与的途径的各个方面,即协调风险评估的数据收集、计算和沟通风险。初级保健参与的要求捕捉到了在参与之前提供培训和教育包以解决知识缺陷的需求。此外,还讨论了初级保健对参与管理被确定为高风险的女性所保留的意见,并提供了促进初级保健承担这一角色的建议。

结论

尽管对初级保健可能引领乳腺癌风险评估和初级预防途径持乐观态度,但参与者有一系列关注,在制定此类途径时应予以考虑。

相似文献

1
Development of a breast cancer risk assessment and primary prevention pathway for women aged 30-39 years: Views of UK primary care providers on the role of primary care.为 30-39 岁女性制定乳腺癌风险评估和初级预防路径:英国初级保健提供者对初级保健作用的看法。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 13;19(9):e0308638. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308638. eCollection 2024.
2
Optimising the delivery of breast cancer risk assessment for women aged 30-39 years: A qualitative study of women's views.优化 30-39 岁女性乳腺癌风险评估的实施:一项针对女性观点的定性研究。
Womens Health (Lond). 2023 Jan-Dec;19:17455057231160348. doi: 10.1177/17455057231160348.
3
Introducing a low-risk breast screening pathway into the NHS Breast Screening Programme: Views from healthcare professionals who are delivering risk-stratified screening.将低风险乳腺癌筛查途径引入国民保健制度乳腺筛查计划:实施风险分层筛查的医疗保健专业人员的观点。
Womens Health (Lond). 2021 Jan-Dec;17:17455065211009746. doi: 10.1177/17455065211009746.
4
The feasibility of implementing risk stratification into a national breast cancer screening programme: a focus group study investigating the perspectives of healthcare personnel responsible for delivery.实施风险分层筛查纳入国家乳腺癌筛查计划的可行性:一项针对负责实施人员的观点的焦点小组研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2022 May 2;22(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01730-0.
5
Women's decision-making regarding risk-stratified breast cancer screening and prevention from the perspective of international healthcare professionals.从国际医疗保健专业人员的角度来看,女性在风险分层乳腺癌筛查和预防方面的决策。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 1;13(6):e0197772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197772. eCollection 2018.
6
European women's perceptions of the implementation and organisation of risk-based breast cancer screening and prevention: a qualitative study.欧洲女性对基于风险的乳腺癌筛查和预防的实施和组织的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Mar 24;20(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06745-0.
7
Are we ready for the challenge of implementing risk-based breast cancer screening and primary prevention?我们是否已准备好迎接基于风险的乳腺癌筛查和一级预防的挑战?
Breast. 2018 Jun;39:24-32. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.02.029. Epub 2018 Mar 10.
8
Women's perceptions of personalized risk-based breast cancer screening and prevention: An international focus group study.女性对基于个性化风险的乳腺癌筛查和预防的认知:一项国际焦点小组研究。
Psychooncology. 2019 May;28(5):1056-1062. doi: 10.1002/pon.5051. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
Differences in the perceived role of the healthcare provider in delivering vascular health checks: a Q methodology study.感知医疗服务提供者在提供血管健康检查方面的角色差异:一项 Q 方法学研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Nov 14;14:172. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-172.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring the barriers to and facilitators of implementing CanRisk in primary care: a qualitative thematic framework analysis.探讨在初级保健中实施 CanRisk 的障碍和促进因素:定性主题框架分析。
Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Jul 27;73(733):e586-e596. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0643. Print 2023 Aug.
2
Acceptability of risk stratification within population-based cancer screening from the perspective of healthcare professionals: A mixed methods systematic review and recommendations to support implementation.基于人群的癌症筛查中风险分层的可接受性:从医疗保健专业人员的角度出发的混合方法系统评价及实施建议。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 24;18(2):e0279201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279201. eCollection 2023.
3
Proactive breast cancer risk assessment in primary care: a review based on the principles of screening.初级保健中的主动乳腺癌风险评估:基于筛查原则的综述。
Br J Cancer. 2023 May;128(9):1636-1646. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02145-w. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
4
Skill-mix change and outcomes in primary care: Longitudinal analysis of general practices in England 2015-2019.技能组合变化与初级保健结果:2015-2019 年英格兰普通实践的纵向分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Sep;308:115224. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115224. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
5
Primary care workforce composition and population, professional, and system outcomes: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis.基层医疗劳动力构成与人口、专业和系统结果:回顾性横断面分析。
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Apr 28;72(718):e307-e315. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0593. Print 2022 May.
6
Prospective evaluation of a breast-cancer risk model integrating classical risk factors and polygenic risk in 15 cohorts from six countries.前瞻性评估一个乳腺癌风险模型,该模型整合了来自六个国家的 15 个队列中的经典风险因素和多基因风险。
Int J Epidemiol. 2022 Jan 6;50(6):1897-1911. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyab036. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
7
Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Primary Prevention Advice in Primary Care: A Systematic Review of Provider Attitudes and Routine Behaviours.基层医疗中乳腺癌风险评估与一级预防建议:对医疗服务提供者态度和常规行为的系统评价
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Aug 18;13(16):4150. doi: 10.3390/cancers13164150.
8
Toward a Population-Based Breast Cancer Risk Stratification Approach? The Needs and Concerns of Healthcare Providers.迈向基于人群的乳腺癌风险分层方法?医疗服务提供者的需求与担忧。
J Pers Med. 2021 Jun 10;11(6):540. doi: 10.3390/jpm11060540.
9
Global burden and trends in premenopausal and postmenopausal breast cancer: a population-based study.全球绝经前和绝经后乳腺癌的负担和趋势:一项基于人群的研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Aug;8(8):e1027-e1037. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30215-1.
10
Impact of adding breast density to breast cancer risk models: A systematic review.添加乳腺密度对乳腺癌风险模型的影响:系统评价。
Eur J Radiol. 2020 Jun;127:109019. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109019. Epub 2020 Apr 19.