Coulton C J, McClish D, Doremus H, Powell S, Smookler S, Jackson D L
Med Care. 1985 Aug;23(8):977-85. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198508000-00005.
Patients in the most prevalent DRGs in a Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU) were compared with their counterparts who received only routine hospital care on adjusted total hospital costs and length of stay. Costs for both groups were compared with estimated DRG payments under an all-payer system. For patients in three DRGs, measures of severity of illness were examined as predictors of costs. Significant differences between MICU and routine care patients were found in 10 of 13 DRGs studied; intensive care costs were substantially above overall payment rates. The severity of illness measures varied widely in their correlation with costs, depending on DRG and whether the patients were MICU or routine care. These apparent differences in accounting costs may result in hospital decisions to restrict the number of MICU beds. Severity of illness adjustments to DRGs might produce more equitable payments. The most useful measure of severity may differ, however, depending on DRG.
将医疗重症监护病房(MICU)中最常见诊断相关分组(DRG)的患者与仅接受常规医院护理的患者进行比较,比较其调整后的总住院费用和住院时长。将两组的费用与全支付系统下的预估DRG支付费用进行比较。对于三个DRG中的患者,检查疾病严重程度指标作为费用预测因素。在所研究的13个DRG中的10个中发现MICU患者与常规护理患者之间存在显著差异;重症监护费用大幅高于总体支付率。疾病严重程度指标与费用的相关性差异很大,这取决于DRG以及患者是在MICU还是接受常规护理。这些核算成本上的明显差异可能导致医院决定限制MICU床位数量。对DRG进行疾病严重程度调整可能会产生更公平的支付。然而,最有用的严重程度指标可能因DRG而异。