Department of Surgery, Detroit Medical Center, Wayne State University, 4201 St Antoine, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA.
Department of Surgery, NorthShore University Health System, 2650 Ridge Ave, GCSI Suite B665, Evanston, IL, 60201, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):5914-5921. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11194-y. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
Despite excellent surgical outcomes, a minority of qualified patients undergo weight loss surgery. Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG), an incisionless procedure, has proven to be effective in achieving weight loss and comorbidity improvement. We aim to compare outcomes of ESG to those of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG).
A retrospective review of a prospective database of patients who underwent ESG and LSG at NorthShore University HealthSystem from 2016 to 2023 was completed. Demographic and outcome data were analyzed. Pre- and post-surgical data were compared using chi-square and two-sample t tests. Improvement or resolution of obesity-related comorbidities were also assessed.
A total of 212 LSG and 68 ESG patients were reviewed. ESG patients were older (47 ± 10 vs. 43 ± 12, p = 0.006) and less obese (BMI 37.0 ± 5.5 vs. 45.8 ± 0.4, p < 0.001) than LSG patients. Median length of stay after ESG was 0 days and after LSG 1 day (p < 0.001). Severe adverse events were seen less frequent after ESG (1.47%, vs 3.77%). LSG achieved more significant %TBWL at 6 months (25.2 ± 8.9 vs 14.9 ± 7.4), 1 year (27.5 ± 10.8 vs 14.1 ± 9.8), and 2 years (25.7 ± 10.8 vs 10.5 ± 8.8, all p < 0.001) after surgery when compared to ESG. LSG achieved significantly greater %EWL compared to ESG at 6 months (57.0 ± 20.7 vs 50.4 ± 29.2, p = 0.137), 1 year (61.4 ± 24.6 vs 46.5 ± 34.0, p = 0.026), and 2 years postoperatively (59.7 ± 25.5 vs 32.6 ± 28.2, p = 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in rates of improvement or resolution of diabetes, obstructive sleep apnea, hyperlipidemia, or hypertension.
ESG is an effective procedure for weight loss and comorbidity resolution. Obesity-related comorbidities are comparably improved and resolved following ESG vs LSG. Although the weight loss in LSG is significantly higher, patients can expect a shorter hospital length of stay and a lower rate of complications after ESG. ESG continues to show promise for long-term weight loss and improvement in health.
尽管手术效果出色,但仍有少数合格患者选择接受减肥手术。内镜袖状胃成形术(ESG)作为一种非切口手术,已被证明在实现体重减轻和改善合并症方面有效。我们旨在比较 ESG 与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)的结果。
对 2016 年至 2023 年在 NorthShore 大学健康系统接受 ESG 和 LSG 的患者前瞻性数据库进行回顾性分析。分析人口统计学和结果数据。使用卡方检验和两样本 t 检验比较术前和术后数据。还评估了肥胖相关合并症的改善或缓解情况。
共回顾了 212 例 LSG 和 68 例 ESG 患者。ESG 患者年龄较大(47±10 岁比 43±12 岁,p=0.006),肥胖程度较轻(BMI 37.0±5.5 比 45.8±0.4,p<0.001)。ESG 术后中位住院时间为 0 天,LSG 为 1 天(p<0.001)。ESG 后严重不良事件发生率较低(1.47%,比 3.77%)。LSG 在 6 个月时(25.2±8.9 比 14.9±7.4)、1 年时(27.5±10.8 比 14.1±9.8)和 2 年时(25.7±10.8 比 10.5±8.8)的体重减轻百分比(%TBWL)更显著,所有差异均具有统计学意义(均 p<0.001)。与 ESG 相比,LSG 在 6 个月(57.0±20.7 比 50.4±29.2,p=0.137)、1 年(61.4±24.6 比 46.5±34.0,p=0.026)和 2 年后(59.7±25.5 比 32.6±28.2,p=0.001)的体重减轻百分比(%EWL)更显著。糖尿病、阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停、高脂血症或高血压的改善或缓解率无统计学差异。
ESG 是一种有效的减肥和合并症治疗方法。肥胖相关合并症在 ESG 和 LSG 后均得到改善和缓解。虽然 LSG 的减肥效果显著更高,但 ESG 术后患者的住院时间更短,并发症发生率更低。ESG 继续显示出在长期减肥和改善健康方面的潜力。