Department of Philosophy, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Rathenau Instituut, Den Haag, The Netherlands.
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Sep 13;24(1):1000. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05913-1.
Health professionals need to be prepared for interdisciplinary research collaborations aimed at the development and implementation of medical technology. Expertise is highly domain-specific, and learned by being immersed in professional practice. Therefore, the approaches and results from one domain are not easily understood by experts from another domain. Interdisciplinary collaboration in medical research faces not only institutional, but also cognitive and epistemological barriers. This is one of the reasons why interdisciplinary and interprofessional research collaborations are so difficult. To explain the cognitive and epistemological barriers, we introduce the concept of disciplinary perspectives. Making explicit the disciplinary perspectives of experts participating in interdisciplinary collaborations helps to clarify the specific approach of each expert, thereby improving mutual understanding.
We developed a framework for making disciplinary perspectives of experts participating in an interdisciplinary research collaboration explicit. The applicability of the framework has been tested in an interdisciplinary medical research project aimed at the development and implementation of diffusion MRI for the diagnosis of kidney cancer, where the framework was applied to analyse and articulate the disciplinary perspectives of the experts involved.
We propose a general framework, in the form of a series of questions, based on new insights from the philosophy of science into the epistemology of interdisciplinary research. We explain these philosophical underpinnings in order to clarify the cognitive and epistemological barriers of interdisciplinary research collaborations. In addition, we present a detailed example of the use of the framework in a concrete interdisciplinary research project aimed at developing a diagnostic technology. This case study demonstrates the applicability of the framework in interdisciplinary research projects.
Interdisciplinary research collaborations can be facilitated by a better understanding of how an expert's disciplinary perspectives enables and guides their specific approach to a problem. Implicit disciplinary perspectives can and should be made explicit in a systematic manner, for which we propose a framework that can be used by disciplinary experts participating in interdisciplinary research project. Furthermore, we suggest that educators can explore how the framework and philosophical underpinning can be implemented in HPE to support the development of students' interdisciplinary expertise.
健康专业人员需要为旨在开发和实施医疗技术的跨学科研究合作做好准备。专业知识高度特定于领域,并且通过沉浸在专业实践中学习。因此,一个领域的方法和结果不容易被另一个领域的专家理解。医学研究中的跨学科合作不仅面临制度障碍,还面临认知和认识论障碍。这也是跨学科和跨专业研究合作如此困难的原因之一。为了解释认知和认识论障碍,我们引入了学科视角的概念。明确参与跨学科合作的专家的学科视角有助于阐明每个专家的具体方法,从而增进相互理解。
我们开发了一个框架,用于明确参与跨学科研究合作的专家的学科视角。该框架的适用性已在一个旨在开发和实施扩散 MRI 以诊断肾癌的跨学科医学研究项目中进行了测试,该框架用于分析和阐述所涉及专家的学科视角。
我们提出了一个通用框架,以一系列问题的形式,基于科学哲学对跨学科研究认识论的新见解。我们解释了这些哲学基础,以澄清跨学科研究合作的认知和认识论障碍。此外,我们还展示了该框架在一个具体的旨在开发诊断技术的跨学科研究项目中的详细应用示例。该案例研究表明了该框架在跨学科研究项目中的适用性。
通过更好地理解专家的学科视角如何使他们对问题的特定方法成为可能并指导其方法,可以促进跨学科研究合作。可以并且应该以系统的方式明确隐含的学科视角,为此我们提出了一个框架,供参与跨学科研究项目的学科专家使用。此外,我们建议教育工作者可以探索如何在 HPE 中实施该框架和哲学基础,以支持学生跨学科专业知识的发展。