Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, South Australia.
Med Educ. 2018 Jan;52(1):114-124. doi: 10.1111/medu.13455. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
The Edinburgh Declaration, developed in 1998 as a pledge to alter the character of medical education to more effectively meet the needs of society, included a recommendation to increase the opportunity for joint learning between health and health-related professions, as part of the training for teamwork. This article acknowledges achievements since the Declaration in relation to this recommendation, using an umbrella term for the phenomenon, 'educating for collaborative practice', and presents a perspective framed as a series of questions to encourage reflection on future directions.
A literature interpretation, informed by philosophical hermeneutics, was conducted using text sets comprising reports and reviews from a section of the international literature since 1988. The interpretation involved: engaging with meanings as presented in the chosen texts; making iterative returns to the texts to explore emerging understanding; and ensuring parts of our understanding from particular texts were fused with complete understanding of the texts as a whole. A lens of appreciative inquiry facilitated acknowledgement of what has been achieved, while being curious about how it could be.
Interpretation of the selected literature revealed notable achievements. Areas for further consideration were identified in relation to three themes: establishing shared understanding AND purpose behind use of terminology; being a conduit AND sharing responsibility for change; exploring ways of doing things AND ensuring ongoing inclusivity.
Interpreting the current literature on 'educating for collaborative practice' has generated questions for reflection on how it may be otherwise. Readers are encouraged to embrace the tensions inherent in unanswered questions, providing space for communication, initiative and diversity of thought. An ongoing dialogue with the literature is proposed, asking whether educating students for a collective identity in settings where they are learning for and with patients is likely to advance educating for patient-centred collaborative practice.
1998 年制定的《爱丁堡宣言》承诺改变医学教育的性质,以更有效地满足社会的需求,其中包括建议增加卫生和卫生相关专业之间的联合学习机会,作为团队合作培训的一部分。本文承认自该宣言发布以来在这一建议方面所取得的成就,使用“协作实践教育”这一总称来描述这一现象,并提出了一个视角,以一系列问题的形式呈现,以鼓励对未来方向进行反思。
采用文献阐释法,借鉴哲学诠释学,对 1988 年以来国际文献中的报告和综述进行了文本集分析。解释过程包括:理解所选文本中呈现的意义;迭代返回文本,以探索新出现的理解;确保我们从特定文本中获得的部分理解与整个文本的完整理解融合。欣赏式探究的视角有助于承认已经取得的成就,同时对如何才能取得成就感到好奇。
对所选文献的解释揭示了显著的成就。在以下三个主题方面确定了进一步考虑的领域:在使用术语的背后建立共同的理解和目的;作为沟通的渠道,共同承担变革的责任;探索做事的方式,并确保持续的包容性。
对“协作实践教育”当前文献的解读引发了对其如何才能有所不同的思考。鼓励读者接受未回答问题中固有的紧张关系,为沟通、主动性和思想多样性留出空间。提议与文献进行持续对话,询问在学生为与患者一起学习而学习的环境中培养集体认同感是否有助于推进以患者为中心的协作实践教育。