Suppr超能文献

心力衰竭患者心房颤动的导管消融:聚焦最新临床证据

Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Heart Failure: Focus on the Latest Clinical Evidence.

作者信息

Demarchi Andrea, Casula Matteo, Annoni Ginevra, Foti Marco, Rordorf Roberto

机构信息

Istituto Cardiocentro Ticino, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, 6900 Lugano, Canton Ticino, Switzerland.

Istituto Cardiocentro Ticino, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, 6500 Bellinzona, Canton Ticino, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 29;13(17):5138. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175138.

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation and heart failure are two common cardiovascular conditions that frequently coexist, and it has been widely demonstrated that in patients with chronic heart failure, atrial fibrillation is associated with a significant increase in the risk of all-cause death and all-cause hospitalization. Nevertheless, there is no unanimous consensus in the literature on how to approach this category of patients and which therapeutic strategy (rhythm control or frequency control) is the most favorable in terms of prognosis; moreover, there is still a lack of data comparing the different ablative techniques of atrial fibrillation in terms of efficacy, and many of the current trials do not consider current ablative techniques such as high-power short-duration ablation index protocol for radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation. Eventually, while several RCTs have widely proved that in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, ablation of atrial fibrillation is superior to medical therapy alone, there is no consensus regarding those with preserved ejection fraction. For these reasons, in this review, we aim to summarize the main updated evidence guiding clinical decision in this complex scenario, with a special focus on the most recent trials and the latest meta-analyses that examined the role of catheter ablation (CA) in rhythm control in patients with AF and HF.

摘要

心房颤动和心力衰竭是两种常见的心血管疾病,常同时存在。大量研究表明,在慢性心力衰竭患者中,心房颤动与全因死亡和全因住院风险的显著增加相关。然而,对于如何治疗这类患者以及哪种治疗策略(节律控制或频率控制)在预后方面最为有利,文献中尚未达成一致共识;此外,在房颤不同消融技术的疗效比较方面,仍缺乏相关数据,而且当前许多试验并未考虑诸如用于射频肺静脉隔离的高功率短持续时间消融指数方案等当前的消融技术。最终,虽然多项随机对照试验广泛证明,在射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者中,房颤消融优于单纯药物治疗,但对于射血分数保留的患者,尚无共识。基于这些原因,在本综述中,我们旨在总结在这一复杂情况下指导临床决策的主要最新证据,特别关注最近的试验以及最新的荟萃分析,这些分析探讨了导管消融(CA)在房颤合并心力衰竭患者节律控制中的作用。

相似文献

5
Atrial fibrillation in heart failure: Prime time for ablation!心力衰竭中的心房颤动:消融的黄金时机!
Heart Rhythm O2. 2021 Dec 17;2(6Part B):754-761. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2021.10.011. eCollection 2021 Dec.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验