Marques Vidas María, López-Sánchez Paula, Sánchez-Briales Paula, López Illazquez María Victoria, Portolés Jose
Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, IDIPHISA, 28222 Madrid, Spain.
Medicine Department, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, IDIPHISA, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 30;13(17):5166. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175166.
GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have emerged as fundamental components in the treatment of type 2 diabetic patients (T2DM) with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The oral formulation represents a novel therapeutic tool but may affect drug efficacy. This study sought to compare the effectiveness of subcutaneous versus oral semaglutide formulations in patients with CKD. A retrospective study in a real-world setting compared type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease patients, initiating oral semaglutide treatment to a historically matched control group treated with subcutaneous semaglutide. The matching considered factors such as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), age, and sex. Nineteen patients were included in both groups, with a mean age of 68.0. Seventy-two percent were males with a CKD-EPI eGFR of 49.9 mL/min/1.73 m and a median urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio of 12.7 mg/g. Of the study participants, 94% and 79% of patients were on the maximum semaglutide sbc vs. oral dose, while 5.3% and 15.8% were on the sbc vs. oral low dose. Oral semaglutide significantly reduced HbA1C and BMI, identical to the control group (-0.9 and -1.4, > 0.05). Renal function parameters and blood pressure remained stable throughout the follow-up in both groups. The main side effect was digestive intolerance (affecting three patients in the oral group and two patients in the subcutaneous group, = 0.6), although the treatment abandonment percentage was similar. The oral formulation of semaglutide demonstrated equivalent effectiveness in glucose control and body weight management in patients with T2DM and CKD, even with a higher proportion of patients receiving low to medium doses. Gastrointestinal side effects were comparable between both oral and subcutaneous formulations.
胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)已成为治疗合并慢性肾脏病(CKD)的2型糖尿病患者(T2DM)的重要组成部分。口服制剂是一种新型治疗手段,但可能会影响药物疗效。本研究旨在比较皮下注射与口服司美格鲁肽制剂对CKD患者的有效性。一项在真实世界环境中的回顾性研究,将开始口服司美格鲁肽治疗的2型糖尿病和慢性肾脏病患者与历史匹配的接受皮下注射司美格鲁肽治疗的对照组进行比较。匹配时考虑了估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)、年龄和性别等因素。两组均纳入19例患者,平均年龄为68.0岁。72%为男性,CKD-EPI eGFR为49.9 mL/min/1.73 m²,尿白蛋白与肌酐比值中位数为12.7 mg/g。在研究参与者中,94%和79%的患者皮下注射与口服司美格鲁肽时使用的是最大剂量,而5.3%和15.8%的患者皮下注射与口服时使用的是低剂量。口服司美格鲁肽显著降低糖化血红蛋白(HbA1C)和体重指数(BMI),与对照组相同(分别降低-0.9和-1.4,P>0.05)。两组在整个随访期间肾功能参数和血压均保持稳定。主要副作用是消化不耐受(口服组有3例患者,皮下注射组有2例患者,P=0.6),尽管治疗中断率相似。司美格鲁肽口服制剂在T2DM和CKD患者的血糖控制和体重管理方面显示出同等疗效,即使接受低至中等剂量的患者比例更高。口服和皮下注射两种制剂的胃肠道副作用相当。