Oregon Health & Science University, School of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, Portland OR, USA.
University at Buffalo, School of Dental Medicine, Department of Oral Diagnostic Sciences, Buffalo, NY, USA.
J Dent Res. 2024 Oct;103(11):1083-1090. doi: 10.1177/00220345241265670. Epub 2024 Sep 14.
Fatigue of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) tissues reflects the effects of magnitude (energy density; ED) and frequency of loading (jaw muscle duty factor; DF). This observational study measured these variables and tested for differences in mechanobehavior scores (MBS = ED × DF) and component variables in subjects with and without TMJ disc displacement (±D). In accordance with Institutional Review Board and STROBE guidelines, written informed consent was obtained, and examination and imaging protocols identified eligible adult subjects. Specifically, magnetic resonance imaging was used to assign subjects' TMJs to ±D groups. Subjects were trained to record in-field jaw muscle activities, from which DFs (percentage of recording time) were determined. EDs (mJ/mm) were estimated using modeled TMJ loads and in vivo dynamic stereometry. Multivariate analysis of variance, post hoc independent tests, and K-means cluster analysis identified significant group differences ( < 0.05). Of 242 individuals screened, 65 females (TMJs: 78 +D, 52 -D) and 53 males (TMJs: 39 +D, 67 -D) participated. Subjects produced 312 daytime and 319 nighttime recordings of average duration 6.0 ± 0.2 h and 7.6 ± 0.1 h, respectively, and 219 (114 right, 105 left) intact dynamic stereometry recordings. Average EDs were 2-fold and significantly larger in +D than -D TMJs ( < 0.0001). DFs were on average 3-fold larger during the daytime versus nighttime for both masseter and temporalis muscles and 1.8- and 3.0-fold larger for the masseter versus temporalis muscle during the daytime and nighttime, respectively. Daytime masseter MBSs for +D TMJs in females were the largest overall at 621 ± 212 (mJ/mm)% and 2- to 43-fold larger versus -D TMJs in both sexes during daytime and nighttime. Cluster analysis ( < 0.0001) identified groups 2 and 3, which comprised 87% +D TMJs and had average MBSs 21-fold larger than group 1. The results show MBS as a potential biomarker to predict homeostasis versus progression or reversal of degenerative TMJ structural changes.
颞下颌关节 (TMJ) 组织的疲劳反映了加载幅度(能量密度;ED)和频率(下颌肌肉负荷系数;DF)的影响。这项观察性研究测量了这些变量,并测试了有和没有 TMJ 盘移位(±D)的受试者的机械行为评分(MBS=ED×DF)和组成变量的差异。根据机构审查委员会和 STROBE 指南的规定,获得了书面知情同意书,并进行了检查和成像方案,以确定合格的成年受试者。具体来说,磁共振成像用于将受试者的 TMJ 分配到±D 组。受试者接受了记录场内下颌肌肉活动的培训,从中确定了 DF(记录时间的百分比)。ED(mJ/mm)是使用模型化的 TMJ 载荷和体内动态立体测量法估计的。多变量方差分析、事后独立检验和 K-均值聚类分析确定了显著的组间差异(<0.05)。在筛选出的 242 名个体中,有 65 名女性(TMJ:78 +D,52 -D)和 53 名男性(TMJ:39 +D,67 -D)参与了研究。受试者分别记录了 312 次白天和 319 次夜间的记录,平均持续时间分别为 6.0±0.2 小时和 7.6±0.1 小时,以及 219 次(114 次右侧,105 次左侧)完整的动态立体测量记录。平均 ED 在 +D TMJ 中是 -D TMJ 的两倍,且显著更大(<0.0001)。在白天和夜间,DF 对于咀嚼肌和颞肌分别平均增加了 3 倍,对于咀嚼肌和颞肌在白天和夜间分别增加了 1.8 倍和 3.0 倍。女性 +D TMJ 的白天咀嚼肌 MBS 总体上最大,为 621±212(mJ/mm)%,与男女两性的 -D TMJ 相比,在白天和夜间分别增加了 2 至 43 倍。聚类分析(<0.0001)确定了第 2 组和第 3 组,它们包含 87%的 +D TMJ,平均 MBS 比第 1 组大 21 倍。结果表明,MBS 是一种有潜力的生物标志物,可用于预测 TMJ 结构变化的稳态与进展或逆转。