Silvestre Jason, Rivas Gabriella A, Ravinsky Robert A, Kang James D, Wu Hao Hua, Lawrence James P, Reitman Charles A
Department of Orthopaedics and Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Department of Orthopaedics and Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Spine J. 2024 Sep 12. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.08.029.
Sex diversity in the spine surgery workforce remains limited. Accelerated efforts to recruit more female trainees into spine surgery fellowship training may help promote diversity and inclusion in the emerging spine surgery workforce.
This study assessed the representation of female trainees in spine surgery fellowship training and program factors associated with greater sex diversity among fellows.
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This was a cross-sectional analysis of spine surgery fellows in the United States during the 2016-2017 to 2022-2023 academic years.
N/A.
Representation (%) and participation-to-prevalence ratios (PPRs) defined as the participation of female trainees in spine surgery fellowship training divided by the prevalence of female trainees in previous training cohorts. PPR values <0.8 indicated underrepresentation.
Sex diversity was assessed among spine surgery faculty, spine surgery fellows, orthopaedic surgery residents, neurosurgery residents, and allopathic medical students. Fellowship program characteristics associated with increased sex diversity were calculated with chi square tests.
There were 693 spine surgery fellows and 41 were female (5.9%). Sex diversity in spine surgery fellowship training decreased over the study period (6.4% vs. 4.1%, p=.025). Female trainee representation in spine surgery fellowship training was less than that in orthopaedic surgery residency (14.2%, PPR=0.42), neurosurgery residency (17.1%, PPR=0.35), and allopathic medical school (47.6%, PPR=0.12) training (p<.001). There were 508 faculty at 78 spine surgery fellowships and 25 were female (4.9%). There were 3 female fellowship program directors (3.8%). Fellowship program characteristics associated with increased sex diversity included the presence of female faculty (p=.020). Additional program characteristics including geographic region, accreditation status, number of faculty and fellows were not associated with sex diversity (p>.05).
Female representation in spine surgery fellowship training decreased over the study period and remains underrepresented relative to earlier stages of medical and surgical training. There was a positive association between female faculty and increased sex diversity among fellows. Greater efforts are needed to create training environments that promote diversity, equity, and inclusion in spine surgery fellowship training.
脊柱外科领域的性别多样性仍然有限。加快努力招募更多女性学员参加脊柱外科专科培训,可能有助于促进新兴脊柱外科人才队伍的多样性和包容性。
本研究评估了女性学员在脊柱外科专科培训中的占比,以及与学员中性别多样性增加相关的项目因素。
研究设计/地点:这是一项对2016 - 2017学年至2022 - 2023学年期间美国脊柱外科专科住院医师的横断面分析。
无。
占比(%)和参与率与患病率之比(PPR),定义为女性学员参与脊柱外科专科培训的比例除以先前培训队列中女性学员的患病率。PPR值<0.8表示代表性不足。
对脊柱外科教员、脊柱外科专科住院医师、骨科住院医师、神经外科住院医师和全科医学生的性别多样性进行评估。通过卡方检验计算与性别多样性增加相关的专科培训项目特征。
共有693名脊柱外科专科住院医师,其中41名女性(5.9%)。在研究期间,脊柱外科专科培训中的性别多样性有所下降(6.4%对4.1%,p = 0.025)。脊柱外科专科培训中女性学员的代表性低于骨科住院医师培训(14.2%,PPR = 0.42)、神经外科住院医师培训(17.1%,PPR = 0.35)和全科医学院校培训(47.6%,PPR = 0.12)(p < 0.001)。78个脊柱外科专科培训项目共有508名教员,其中25名女性(4.9%)。有3名女性专科培训项目主任(3.8%)。与性别多样性增加相关的专科培训项目特征包括女性教员的存在(p = 0.020)。其他项目特征,包括地理区域、认证状态、教员和学员数量,与性别多样性无关(p > 0.05)。
在研究期间,脊柱外科专科培训中女性的代表性有所下降,相对于医学和外科培训的早期阶段,仍然代表性不足。女性教员与学员中性别多样性的增加之间存在正相关。需要做出更大努力,营造促进脊柱外科专科培训中的多样性、公平性和包容性的培训环境。