School of Agriculture, Food and Ecosystem Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, VIC, Australia.
Digital Agriculture, Food and Wine Group, School of Agriculture, Food and Ecosystem Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, VIC, Australia.
Food Res Int. 2024 Nov;195:114973. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114973. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
Beyond sensory quality, food-evoked emotions play a crucial role in consumers acceptance and willingness to try, which are essential for product development. The link between fermented coffee sensory characteristics and elicited emotional responses from consumers is underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate consumers' acceptability of spontaneously fermented and unfermented roasted coffee through self-reported sensory evaluation and biometrics assessment. Self-reported liking in 15-cm non-structured scale, multiple choice of negative, neutral, and positive emojis, and subconscious emotional responses from 85 regular coffee consumers were analysed. Their relationship with the pattern of volatile aromatic compounds were also investigated. Fermented (F) and unfermented (UF) coffee beans with light- (L), dark- (D), and commercial dark (C) roasting levels were brewed and evaluated along with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry measurement. Multivariate data analysis was conducted to explore the inner relationships among volatile compounds, self-reported liking, and biometrics. Unfermented-dark roasted coffee (UFD) had highest overall consumer liking response ± standard error (8.68 ± 0.40), followed by the fermented-dark roasted (FD) at 7.73 ± 0.43 with no significant differences (p > 0.05). Fermented light-roasted coffee was associated with lower liking scores and negative emotional responses. In contrast, dark roasted coffee, which was linked to positive emojis and emotional responses, exhibited less detected peak area of volatile compounds contributing fruity and vegetative aromas, such as benzaldehyde, furfuryl acetate, 2-acetyl-1-methyl pyrrole, and isovaleric acid, potentially as negative drivers of consumer liking. Findings from this study could guide coffee manufacturers in developing specialty coffee if spontaneous fermentation is offered.
除了感官质量,食物引起的情绪在消费者的接受度和尝试意愿中起着至关重要的作用,这对产品开发至关重要。发酵咖啡的感官特征与消费者产生的情感反应之间的联系还没有得到充分的研究。本研究旨在通过自我报告的感官评估和生物计量评估来评估消费者对自发发酵和未发酵烘焙咖啡的可接受性。分析了 85 名普通咖啡消费者自我报告的喜好(15 厘米非结构化量表)、对负面、中性和正面表情的多选、潜意识情感反应,以及它们与挥发性芳香化合物模式的关系。还研究了发酵(F)和未发酵(UF)咖啡豆与浅(L)、深(D)和商业深(C)烘焙水平的关系,同时进行了气相色谱-质谱测量。采用多元数据分析方法探索挥发性化合物、自我报告的喜好和生物计量之间的内在关系。未发酵深烘焙咖啡(UFD)的整体消费者喜好反应最高(8.68 ± 0.40),其次是发酵深烘焙咖啡(FD),为 7.73 ± 0.43,差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。发酵浅烘焙咖啡与较低的喜好评分和负面情感反应相关。相比之下,深烘焙咖啡与正面表情和情感反应相关,其挥发性化合物的检测峰面积较低,这些化合物贡献了水果味和植物味香气,如苯甲醛、乙酸糠酯、2-乙酰-1-甲基吡咯和异戊酸,可能是消费者喜好的负面驱动因素。如果提供自发发酵,本研究的结果可以为咖啡制造商开发特种咖啡提供指导。