Department of Imaging, The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, L7 8YA, Liverpool, UK; Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, L7 8TX, Liverpool, UK; Department of Radiology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India; Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Navi Mumbai, India.
Department of Radiology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Clin Radiol. 2024 Nov;79(11):851-860. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2024.08.013. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
To prospectively determine whether extrinsic warming of the low-osmolality CT contrast media (Iohexol 350, Iodixanol 320, Iopromide 300, and Iopamidol 300) to 37°C prior to intravenous administration affects extravasation and allergic-like reaction rates.
This large scale prospective case control study of adverse events included all the patients between the age group of 15-80 years undergoing routine contrast-enhanced computed tomographic (CECT) examinations from April 2018 to March 2020 at our institute. Ex vivo experiments were also performed to demonstrate change in contrast viscosity and fluid dynamics in relation to temperature.
A total of 24,379 CECTs were conducted during the study period. Extrinsic warming showed a significant decrease in extravasation rates for Iohexol 350 at flow rates <3.5 mL/sec (P=0.037). No significant difference was observed with Iopromide 300 (P=0.432). Overall, a significant decrease in allergic reactions and overall contrast-related reactions (excluding physiologic reactions) was noted (P<0.001), with Iohexol 350. However, no significant difference was found with Iopromide 300. The most common physiological reaction was a sense of warmth, more prevalent in the warmed group, aligning with ex-vivo experiments demonstrating decreased viscosity with contrast warming.
Extrinsic warming of contrast helps reduce the incidence of allergic-like reactions and extravasations for Iohexol 350, but no significant difference was noted with Iopromide 300 even at low injection rates (<3.5 mL/sec).
前瞻性地确定在静脉注射前将低渗透压 CT 造影剂(碘海醇 350、碘克沙醇 320、碘普罗胺 300 和碘帕醇 300)加热至 37°C 是否会影响外渗和过敏样反应的发生率。
这项大规模前瞻性病例对照研究包括了 2018 年 4 月至 2020 年 3 月期间在我院接受常规对比增强 CT(CECT)检查的年龄在 15-80 岁之间的所有患者。还进行了体外实验,以证明温度与对比粘度和流体动力学之间的变化关系。
在研究期间共进行了 24379 例 CECT。在流速<3.5mL/sec 时,外源性加热显著降低了碘海醇 350 的外渗率(P=0.037)。但碘普罗胺 300 组未见显著差异(P=0.432)。总体而言,过敏反应和整体对比相关反应(不包括生理反应)显著减少(P<0.001),尤以碘海醇 350 为甚。然而,碘普罗胺 300 组则未见显著差异。最常见的生理反应是温热感,在加热组中更为常见,与体外实验中证明的对比剂加热时粘度降低相一致。
对比剂的外源性加热有助于降低碘海醇 350 过敏样反应和外渗的发生率,但对于碘普罗胺 300 则未见显著差异,即使在低注射速率(<3.5mL/sec)下也是如此。