Suppr超能文献

0.55T平衡稳态自由进动相位对比成像技术在主动脉血流中的应用。

Balanced steady-state free precession phase contrast at 0.55T applied to aortic flow.

作者信息

Xiang Jie, Ramasawmy Rajiv, Seemann Felicia, Peters Dana C, Campbell-Washburn Adrienne E

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Cardiovascular Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2024;26(2):101098. doi: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101098. Epub 2024 Sep 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a growing interest in the development and application of mid-field (0.55T) for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), including flow imaging. However, aortic flow imaging at 0.55T has limited signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), especially in diastolic phases where there is reduced inflow-driven contrast for spoiled gradient recalled echo (GRE) sequences. The low SNR can limit the accuracy of flow and regurgitant fraction measurements.

METHODS

In this work, we developed a two-dimensional phase contrast (PC) acquisition with balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP), termed PC-SSFP, for flow imaging and quantification at 0.55T. This PC-SSFP approach precisely nulls the zeroth and first gradient moments at both the echo time (TE) and repetition time, except for the flow-encoded acquisition, for which the first gradient moment at the TE is determined by the velocity encoding. Our proposed sequence was tested in both phantoms and in healthy volunteers (n = 11), to measure aortic flow. In volunteers, both a breath-hold (bh) and a free-breathing (fb) protocol, with averaging to increase SNR, were obtained. Total flow, peak flow, cardiac output, and SNR were compared for PC-SSFP and PC-GRE. Stroke volumes were also measured and compared to planimetry method.

RESULTS

In a phantom, SNR was significantly higher using PC-SSFP compared to PC-GRE (25.5 ± 9.6 vs 8.2 ± 2.9), and the velocity measurements agreed well (R = 1.00). In healthy subjects, for both bh and fb protocols, PC-SSFP measured accurate peak flow (fb: R = 0.99, bh: R = 0.96) and cardiac output (fb: R = 0.98, bh: R = 0.88), compared to PC-GRE, accurate stroke volume (fb: R = 0.94, bh: R = 0.97), compared to planimetry measurement, and offered constant high SNR (fb: 28 ± 9 vs 18 ± 6, bh: 24 ± 7 vs 11 ± 3) over the cardiac cycle in 11 subjects.

CONCLUSION

PC-SSFP is a more reliable evaluation tool for aortic flow quantification, when compared to the conventional PC-GRE method at 0.55T, providing higher SNR, and thus potentially more accurate flows.

摘要

背景

中场(0.55T)心血管磁共振成像(CMR)的开发与应用,包括血流成像,正受到越来越多的关注。然而,0.55T时的主动脉血流成像信噪比(SNR)有限,尤其是在舒张期,对于扰相梯度回波(GRE)序列,流入驱动的对比减弱。低信噪比会限制血流和反流分数测量的准确性。

方法

在本研究中,我们开发了一种用于0.55T血流成像和定量分析的二维相位对比(PC)平衡稳态自由进动(bSSFP)采集技术,称为PC-SSFP。这种PC-SSFP方法在回波时间(TE)和重复时间精确地消除了零阶和一阶梯度矩,除了流动编码采集,其在TE处的一阶梯度矩由速度编码决定。我们提出的序列在体模和健康志愿者(n = 11)中进行了测试,以测量主动脉血流。在志愿者中,分别采用屏气(bh)和自由呼吸(fb)方案,并进行平均以提高信噪比。比较了PC-SSFP和PC-GRE的总血流量、峰值血流、心输出量和信噪比。还测量了每搏量并与平面测量法进行比较。

结果

在体模中,与PC-GRE相比,PC-SSFP的信噪比显著更高(25.5±9.6对8.2±2.9),速度测量结果一致性良好(R = 1.00)。在健康受试者中,对于bh和fb方案,与PC-GRE相比,PC-SSFP测量的峰值血流准确(fb:R = 0.99,bh:R = 0.96),心输出量准确(fb:R = 0.98,bh:R = 0.88),与平面测量相比,每搏量准确(fb:R = 0.94,bh:R = 0.97),并且在11名受试者的心动周期中提供恒定的高信噪比(fb:28±9对18±6,bh:24±7对11±3)。

结论

与0.55T时的传统PC-GRE方法相比,PC-SSFP是一种更可靠的主动脉血流定量评估工具,具有更高的信噪比,因此潜在地可提供更准确的血流测量结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/653c/11638602/d7293c7afe28/ga1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验