Xiang Jie, Ramasawmy Rajiv, Seemann Felicia, Peters Dana C, Campbell-Washburn Adrienne E
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Cardiovascular Branch, Division of Intramural Research, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2024;26(2):101098. doi: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101098. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
There is a growing interest in the development and application of mid-field (0.55T) for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), including flow imaging. However, aortic flow imaging at 0.55T has limited signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), especially in diastolic phases where there is reduced inflow-driven contrast for spoiled gradient recalled echo (GRE) sequences. The low SNR can limit the accuracy of flow and regurgitant fraction measurements.
In this work, we developed a two-dimensional phase contrast (PC) acquisition with balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP), termed PC-SSFP, for flow imaging and quantification at 0.55T. This PC-SSFP approach precisely nulls the zeroth and first gradient moments at both the echo time (TE) and repetition time, except for the flow-encoded acquisition, for which the first gradient moment at the TE is determined by the velocity encoding. Our proposed sequence was tested in both phantoms and in healthy volunteers (n = 11), to measure aortic flow. In volunteers, both a breath-hold (bh) and a free-breathing (fb) protocol, with averaging to increase SNR, were obtained. Total flow, peak flow, cardiac output, and SNR were compared for PC-SSFP and PC-GRE. Stroke volumes were also measured and compared to planimetry method.
In a phantom, SNR was significantly higher using PC-SSFP compared to PC-GRE (25.5 ± 9.6 vs 8.2 ± 2.9), and the velocity measurements agreed well (R = 1.00). In healthy subjects, for both bh and fb protocols, PC-SSFP measured accurate peak flow (fb: R = 0.99, bh: R = 0.96) and cardiac output (fb: R = 0.98, bh: R = 0.88), compared to PC-GRE, accurate stroke volume (fb: R = 0.94, bh: R = 0.97), compared to planimetry measurement, and offered constant high SNR (fb: 28 ± 9 vs 18 ± 6, bh: 24 ± 7 vs 11 ± 3) over the cardiac cycle in 11 subjects.
PC-SSFP is a more reliable evaluation tool for aortic flow quantification, when compared to the conventional PC-GRE method at 0.55T, providing higher SNR, and thus potentially more accurate flows.
中场(0.55T)心血管磁共振成像(CMR)的开发与应用,包括血流成像,正受到越来越多的关注。然而,0.55T时的主动脉血流成像信噪比(SNR)有限,尤其是在舒张期,对于扰相梯度回波(GRE)序列,流入驱动的对比减弱。低信噪比会限制血流和反流分数测量的准确性。
在本研究中,我们开发了一种用于0.55T血流成像和定量分析的二维相位对比(PC)平衡稳态自由进动(bSSFP)采集技术,称为PC-SSFP。这种PC-SSFP方法在回波时间(TE)和重复时间精确地消除了零阶和一阶梯度矩,除了流动编码采集,其在TE处的一阶梯度矩由速度编码决定。我们提出的序列在体模和健康志愿者(n = 11)中进行了测试,以测量主动脉血流。在志愿者中,分别采用屏气(bh)和自由呼吸(fb)方案,并进行平均以提高信噪比。比较了PC-SSFP和PC-GRE的总血流量、峰值血流、心输出量和信噪比。还测量了每搏量并与平面测量法进行比较。
在体模中,与PC-GRE相比,PC-SSFP的信噪比显著更高(25.5±9.6对8.2±2.9),速度测量结果一致性良好(R = 1.00)。在健康受试者中,对于bh和fb方案,与PC-GRE相比,PC-SSFP测量的峰值血流准确(fb:R = 0.99,bh:R = 0.96),心输出量准确(fb:R = 0.98,bh:R = 0.88),与平面测量相比,每搏量准确(fb:R = 0.94,bh:R = 0.97),并且在11名受试者的心动周期中提供恒定的高信噪比(fb:28±9对18±6,bh:24±7对11±3)。
与0.55T时的传统PC-GRE方法相比,PC-SSFP是一种更可靠的主动脉血流定量评估工具,具有更高的信噪比,因此潜在地可提供更准确的血流测量结果。