Deep-learning reconstruction for noise reduction in respiratory-triggered single-shot phase sensitive inversion recovery myocardial delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance.

BACKGROUND

Phase-sensitive inversion recovery late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) improves tissue contrast, however it is challenging to combine with a free-breathing acquisition. Deep-learning (DL) algorithms have growing applications in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) to improve image quality. We compared a novel combination of a free-breathing single-shot phase-sensitive LGE with respiratory triggering (FB-PS) sequence with DL noise reduction reconstruction algorithm to a conventional segmented phase-sensitive LGE acquired during breath holding (BH-PS).

METHODS

61 adult subjects (29 male, age 51 ± 15) underwent clinical CMR (1.5 T) with the FB-PS sequence and the conventional BH-PS sequence. DL noise reduction was incorporated into the image reconstruction pipeline. Qualitative metrics included image quality, artifact severity, diagnostic confidence. Quantitative metrics included septal-blood border sharpness, LGE sharpness, blood-myocardium apparent contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), LGE-myocardium CNR, LGE apparent signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and LGE burden. The sequences were compared via paired t-tests.

RESULTS

27 subjects had positive LGE. Average time to acquire a slice for FB-PS was 4-12 s versus ∼32-38 s for BH-PS (including breath instructions and break time in between breath hold). FB-PS with medium DL noise reduction had better image quality (FB-PS 3.0 ± 0.7 vs. BH-PS 1.5 ± 0.6, p < 0.0001), less artifact (4.8 ± 0.5 vs. 3.4 ± 1.1, p < 0.0001), and higher diagnostic confidence (4.0 ± 0.6 vs. 2.6 ± 0.8, p < 0.0001). Septum sharpness in FB-PS with DL reconstruction versus BH-PS was not significantly different. There was no significant difference in LGE sharpness or LGE burden. FB-PS had superior blood-myocardium CNR (17.2 ± 6.9 vs. 16.4 ± 6.0, p = 0.040), LGE-myocardium CNR (12.1 ± 7.2 vs. 10.4 ± 6.6, p = 0.054), and LGE SNR (59.8 ± 26.8 vs. 31.2 ± 24.1, p < 0.001); these metrics further improved with DL noise reduction.

CONCLUSION

A FB-PS sequence shortens scan time by over 5-fold and reduces motion artifact. Combined with a DL noise reduction algorithm, FB-PS provides better or similar image quality compared to BH-PS. This is a promising solution for patients who cannot hold their breath.