• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种基于协议的护士护理决策的自下而上框架。

A bottom-up framework for nurses' protocol-based care decision-making.

作者信息

Vázquez-Calatayud Monica, Pumar-Méndez María J, Oroviogoicoechea Cristina

机构信息

Area of Nursing Professional Development and Research, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.

Innovation for a Person-Centred Care Research Group (ICCP-UNAV), University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.

出版信息

Nurs Open. 2024 Sep;11(9):e2232. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2232.

DOI:10.1002/nop2.2232
PMID:39279282
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11403125/
Abstract

AIM

To develop a conceptual framework for nurses' protocol-based care decision-making.

DESIGN

Miles & Huberman's bottom-up approach to developing conceptual frameworks was followed, using data collected from a multiple embedded case study examining protocol-based decision-making by nurses in three hospital wards within a university hospital in northern Spain.

METHODS

The qualitative data from the case study, obtained through documentary analysis, observations, and interviews, underwent a secondary analysis consisting of four steps: data reduction, data display, comparison, and drawing conclusions.

RESULTS

The framework for protocol-based care decision-making comprises four components: (1) protocol-based care, as a balance between standardisation and individualised care, (2) the process, (3) the context, and (4) the elements of protocol-based care decision-making. These components and their relationship as a context-dependent, linear, variable and multifactorial process, directly influenced by the perception of risk, are described and illustrated.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides a rigorous bottom-up framework for nurses' protocol-based care decision-making. The framework could be a valuable resource for managers, clinical nurses, educators, and researchers to guide and evaluate nurses' decision-making, leading to improved care quality and reduced variability in clinical practice. Furthermore, the framework lays a foundation for further research and practical applications.

IMPACT

This study addressed the problem of understanding nurses' protocol-based care decision-making and the need for a specific conceptual framework. The main findings of the study contribute to the development of a rigorous bottom-up framework comprising four components of protocol-based care decision-making. The framework has the potential to improve care quality, reduce variability, enhance patient safety, and increase healthcare efficiency by guiding nurses' decision-making in various healthcare settings.

NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Patient or public contribution was not applicable since the study focused on nurses' decision making.

摘要

目的

构建一个用于护士基于方案的护理决策的概念框架。

设计

采用迈尔斯和休伯曼自下而上构建概念框架的方法,使用从一项多重嵌入式案例研究中收集的数据,该研究考察了西班牙北部一所大学医院三个病房中护士基于方案的决策。

方法

通过文献分析、观察和访谈获得的案例研究定性数据进行了二次分析,包括四个步骤:数据简化、数据展示、比较和得出结论。

结果

基于方案的护理决策框架包括四个组成部分:(1)基于方案的护理,作为标准化护理与个性化护理之间的平衡;(2)过程;(3)背景;(4)基于方案的护理决策要素。描述并说明了这些组成部分及其作为一个依赖于背景、线性、可变且多因素的过程之间的关系,该过程直接受风险认知的影响。

结论

本研究为护士基于方案的护理决策提供了一个严谨的自下而上的框架。该框架对于管理人员、临床护士、教育工作者和研究人员指导和评估护士的决策可能是一个有价值的资源,有助于提高护理质量并减少临床实践中的变异性。此外,该框架为进一步的研究和实际应用奠定了基础。

影响

本研究解决了理解护士基于方案的护理决策问题以及对特定概念框架的需求。该研究的主要发现有助于构建一个严谨的自下而上的框架,该框架由基于方案的护理决策的四个组成部分构成。该框架有可能通过在各种医疗环境中指导护士的决策来提高护理质量、减少变异性、增强患者安全并提高医疗效率。

无患者或公众参与

由于该研究关注护士的决策,因此患者或公众参与不适用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b9c/11403125/e0bdd62ba8ac/NOP2-11-e2232-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b9c/11403125/e0bdd62ba8ac/NOP2-11-e2232-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b9c/11403125/e0bdd62ba8ac/NOP2-11-e2232-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A bottom-up framework for nurses' protocol-based care decision-making.一种基于协议的护士护理决策的自下而上框架。
Nurs Open. 2024 Sep;11(9):e2232. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2232.
2
Nurses' protocol-based care decision-making: a multiple case study.基于护理规程的护理决策:一项多案例研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Dec;29(23-24):4806-4817. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15524. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
3
The influence of patient complexity and nurses' experience on haemodynamic decision-making following cardiac surgery.患者病情复杂性及护士经验对心脏手术后血流动力学决策的影响。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2006 Aug;22(4):194-205. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2005.06.005. Epub 2006 Mar 24.
4
Protocol-based care: the standardisation of decision-making?基于协议的护理:决策的标准化?
J Clin Nurs. 2009 May;18(10):1490-500. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02605.x.
5
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.探索执业护士教育的概念和理论框架:一项范围综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150.
6
The effect of nomophobic behaviors among nurses on their clinical decision-making perceptions.护士的惧联网行为对其临床决策感知的影响。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2024 May;77:103978. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.103978. Epub 2024 May 9.
7
The decision-making processes of nurses when extubating patients following cardiac surgery: an ethnographic study.心脏手术后护士为患者拔管时的决策过程:一项人种志研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 Aug;43(6):693-705. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.09.003. Epub 2005 Oct 26.
8
A dimensional analysis of experienced intensive care unit nurses' clinical decision-making for bleeding after cardiac surgery.对有经验的重症监护病房护士在心脏手术后出血的临床决策进行的维度分析。
Nurs Crit Care. 2024 Sep;29(5):1119-1131. doi: 10.1111/nicc.13116. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
9
Nurses' tension-based ethical decision making in rural acute care settings.农村急症护理环境下护士基于紧张的伦理决策。
Nurs Ethics. 2020 Jun;27(4):1032-1043. doi: 10.1177/0969733020906594. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
10
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.

本文引用的文献

1
Decision-making in nursing research and practice-Application of the Cognitive Continuum Theory: A meta-aggregative systematic review.护理研究与实践中的决策——认知连续体理论的应用:元综合系统评价。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Dec;32(23-24):7979-7995. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16893. Epub 2023 Oct 15.
2
Application of case study research and ethnography methods: Lessons learned.案例研究和民族志方法的应用:经验教训。
Appl Nurs Res. 2023 Oct;73:151713. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2023.151713. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
3
Rapid Response Systems at a Long-Term Acute Care Hospital.
长期急性护理医院的快速反应系统。
Clin Nurs Res. 2023 Sep;32(7):1031-1040. doi: 10.1177/10547738221144207. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
4
Factors that influence continuing professional development over a nursing career: A scoping review.影响护理职业生涯中继续专业发展的因素:范围综述。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2022 Nov;65:103481. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103481. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
5
Nurses' Perceptions of the Clinical Nurse Specialist Role Implemented in a Highly Specialized University Hospital in Spain: A Qualitative Study.护士对在西班牙一家高度专业化的大学医院实施的临床护理专家角色的看法:一项定性研究。
Clin Nurse Spec. 2022;36(6):317-326. doi: 10.1097/NUR.0000000000000703.
6
A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance.制定和评估复杂干预措施的新框架:对医学研究理事会指南的更新。
BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2061.
7
Nurses' continuing professional development: A systematic literature review.护士的持续专业发展:系统文献回顾。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2021 Jan;50:102963. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102963. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
8
Nurses' protocol-based care decision-making: a multiple case study.基于护理规程的护理决策:一项多案例研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Dec;29(23-24):4806-4817. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15524. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
9
Conceptual framework of the nursing centre for the integration of community health nursing practice, education, and research.社区健康护理实践、教育与研究整合护理中心的概念框架。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2019 Jul 1;20:e99. doi: 10.1017/S1463423619000331.
10
How methodological frameworks are being developed: evidence from a scoping review.方法学框架的制定方法:来自范围综述的证据。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Jun 30;20(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01061-4.