Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, University of Qingdao, Qingdao, China.
Department of Pain Management, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, University of Qingdao, Qingdao, China.
Minerva Anestesiol. 2024 Sep;90(9):759-768. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.24.18125-4.
Opioid anesthesia (OA) is currently the predominant anesthetic method. However, its associated side effects, such as nausea and vomiting, coupled with the principle of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), have spurred the adoption of opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) in select surgical procedures. For small and medium-sized operations, ERAS is particularly important. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of OFA, utilizing esketamine in combination with dexmedetomidine and sevoflurane, on postoperative recovery quality following small and medium-sized surgical interventions.
A total of 120 patients who underwent various small and medium-sized operations were randomly allocated to OFA and OA groups. The OA group received sufentanyl and sevoflurane, while the OFA group received esketamine, dexmedetomidine, and sevoflurane. The primary outcome measure was the postoperative quality of recovery-40 scores (QoR-40) 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes included hemodynamic changes at different time intervals, the incidences of adverse events were recorded.
Patients in the OFA group exhibited a higher QoR-40 score of 184.0 (182.0, 186.2) compared to 182.0 (180.0, 184.0) in the OA group (P<0.001). The disparities were particularly noble in terms of Physical comfort and Emotional status. Multivariable analysis identified postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) as a significant independent factor impacting QoR-40 (β=-4.49 [-6.1, -2.87], P<0.001). Hemodynamic stability was more pronounced in the OFA than in the OA group. The incidence of PONV was substantially lower in the OFA group (one [1.6%] vs. 14 [25%], P<0.001), with a reduced need for vasoactive drugs (five [7.8%] vs. 15 [26.8%], P=0.005), and a lower incidence of respiratory depression (0 [0%] vs. six [10.7%], P=0.009).
OFA improves the postoperative recovery quality in small and medium-sized surgical procedures, potentially attributed to decreased incidence of PONV. Additionally, OFA facilitates the maintenance of more stable hemodynamics throughout the operation.
阿片类麻醉(OA)目前是主要的麻醉方法。然而,其相关的副作用,如恶心和呕吐,再加上手术后加速康复(ERAS)的原则,促使在某些手术中采用无阿片类麻醉(OFA)。对于中小型手术,ERAS 尤为重要。本研究旨在探讨使用依托咪酯联合右美托咪定和七氟醚的 OFA 对中小型手术术后恢复质量的影响。
将 120 名接受各种中小型手术的患者随机分为 OFA 和 OA 组。OA 组接受舒芬太尼和七氟醚,而 OFA 组接受依托咪酯、右美托咪定和七氟醚。主要观察指标为术后 24 小时的恢复质量-40 评分(QoR-40)。次要观察指标包括不同时间间隔的血流动力学变化,记录不良事件的发生率。
OFA 组患者的 QoR-40 评分较高,为 184.0(182.0,186.2),而 OA 组为 182.0(180.0,184.0)(P<0.001)。在身体舒适度和情绪状态方面,差异尤为显著。多变量分析表明,术后恶心呕吐(PONV)是影响 QoR-40 的显著独立因素(β=-4.49[-6.1,-2.87],P<0.001)。OFA 组的血流动力学稳定性更为显著。OFA 组 PONV 的发生率显著降低(1[1.6%] vs. 14[25%],P<0.001),血管活性药物的需求减少(5[7.8%] vs. 15[26.8%],P=0.005),呼吸抑制的发生率降低(0[0%] vs. 6[10.7%],P=0.009)。
OFA 可改善中小型手术的术后恢复质量,可能归因于 PONV 的发生率降低。此外,OFA 有利于在整个手术过程中维持更稳定的血流动力学。