• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胶质母细胞瘤的症状表现能否预测治疗决策和生存率?来自瑞典脑肿瘤登记处1458例患者的真实世界数据。

Do presenting symptoms predict treatment decisions and survival in glioblastoma? Real-world data from 1458 patients in the Swedish brain tumor registry.

作者信息

Bruhn Helena, Tavelin Björn, Rosenlund Lena, Henriksson Roger

机构信息

Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Clinical Research Unit, Cancercentrum, Region Vasterbotten, Umea University Hospital, Umea, Sweden.

出版信息

Neurooncol Pract. 2024 Apr 23;11(5):652-659. doi: 10.1093/nop/npae036. eCollection 2024 Oct.

DOI:10.1093/nop/npae036
PMID:39279780
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11398927/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumor in adults. Non-invasive clinical parameters could play a crucial role in treatment planning and serve as predictors of patient survival. Our register-based real-life study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of presenting symptoms.

METHODS

Data on presenting symptoms and survival, as well as known prognostic factors, were retrieved for all glioblastoma patients in Sweden registered in the Swedish Brain Tumor Registry between 2018 and 2021. The prognostic impact of different presenting symptoms was calculated using the Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

Data from 1458 adults with pathologically verified IDH wild-type glioblastoma were analyzed. Median survival time was 345 days. The 2-year survival rate was 21.5%. Registered presenting symptoms were focal neurological deficits, cognitive dysfunction, headache, epilepsy, signs of raised intracranial pressure, and cranial nerve symptoms, with some patients having multiple symptoms. Patients with initial cognitive dysfunction had significantly shorter survival than patients without; 265 days (245-285) vs. 409 days (365-453;  < .001). The reduced survival remained after Cox regression adjusting for known prognostic factors. Patients presenting with seizures and patients with headaches had significantly longer overall survival compared to patients without these symptoms, but the difference was not retained in multivariate analysis. Patients with cognitive deficits were less likely to have radical surgery and to receive extensive anti-neoplastic nonsurgical treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This extensive real-life study reveals that initial cognitive impairment acts as an independent negative predictive factor for treatment decisions and adversely affects survival outcomes in glioblastoma patients.

摘要

背景

胶质母细胞瘤是成人中最常见的恶性脑肿瘤。非侵入性临床参数在治疗规划中可能发挥关键作用,并可作为患者生存的预测指标。我们基于登记的真实世界研究旨在调查首发症状的预后价值。

方法

检索了2018年至2021年在瑞典脑肿瘤登记处登记的所有瑞典胶质母细胞瘤患者的首发症状、生存数据以及已知的预后因素。使用Cox比例风险模型计算不同首发症状的预后影响。

结果

分析了1458例经病理证实为异柠檬酸脱氢酶(IDH)野生型胶质母细胞瘤的成人患者的数据。中位生存时间为345天。2年生存率为21.5%。登记的首发症状包括局灶性神经功能缺损、认知功能障碍、头痛、癫痫、颅内压升高体征和颅神经症状,一些患者有多种症状。初始有认知功能障碍的患者的生存期明显短于无认知功能障碍的患者;分别为265天(245 - 285天)和409天(365 - 453天;P <.001)。在对已知预后因素进行Cox回归调整后,生存期缩短的情况仍然存在。与无癫痫发作和头痛症状的患者相比,有癫痫发作和头痛症状的患者的总生存期明显更长,但在多变量分析中这种差异未保留。有认知缺陷的患者进行根治性手术和接受广泛抗肿瘤非手术治疗的可能性较小。

结论

这项广泛的真实世界研究表明,初始认知障碍是胶质母细胞瘤患者治疗决策的独立负面预测因素,并对生存结果产生不利影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9690/11398927/fbef0f0c136d/npae036_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9690/11398927/fbef0f0c136d/npae036_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9690/11398927/fbef0f0c136d/npae036_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Do presenting symptoms predict treatment decisions and survival in glioblastoma? Real-world data from 1458 patients in the Swedish brain tumor registry.胶质母细胞瘤的症状表现能否预测治疗决策和生存率?来自瑞典脑肿瘤登记处1458例患者的真实世界数据。
Neurooncol Pract. 2024 Apr 23;11(5):652-659. doi: 10.1093/nop/npae036. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Initial cognitive impairment predicts shorter survival of patients with glioblastoma.初始认知障碍预示着胶质母细胞瘤患者的生存期较短。
Acta Neurol Scand. 2022 Jan;145(1):94-101. doi: 10.1111/ane.13529. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
3
Prognostic Factors in Glioblastoma: Is There a Role for Epilepsy?胶质母细胞瘤的预后因素:癫痫是否起作用?
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2018 Mar 15;58(3):110-115. doi: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2017-0167. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
4
Epileptic features and survival in glioblastomas presenting with seizures.伴有癫痫发作的胶质母细胞瘤的癫痫特征与生存情况
Epilepsy Res. 2017 Feb;130:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2016.12.013. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
5
Defining subventricular zone involvement to predict the survival of patients in isocitrate dehydrogenase-wild type glioblastoma: validation in a prospective registry.定义室管膜下区侵犯以预测异柠檬酸脱氢酶野生型胶质母细胞瘤患者的生存:前瞻性登记研究的验证。
Eur Radiol. 2023 Sep;33(9):6448-6458. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09625-w. Epub 2023 Apr 15.
6
Initial surgical resection and long time to occurrence from initial diagnosis are independent prognostic factors in resected recurrent IDH wild-type glioblastoma.初次手术切除和从初次诊断到复发的时间间隔是 IDH 野生型复发性胶质母细胞瘤经手术切除后的独立预后因素。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Sep;196:106006. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106006. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
7
EGFR amplification is a real independent prognostic impact factor between young adults and adults over 45yo with wild-type glioblastoma?EGFR 扩增是否是 45 岁以上野生型胶质母细胞瘤年轻成人和成人之间真正独立的预后影响因素?
J Neurooncol. 2020 Jan;146(2):275-284. doi: 10.1007/s11060-019-03364-z. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
8
Neurological symptom burden impacts survival prognosis in patients with newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases.新发非小细胞肺癌脑转移患者的神经症状负担影响生存预后。
Cancer. 2020 Oct 1;126(19):4341-4352. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33085. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
9
Thalamic Glioblastoma: Clinical Presentation, Management Strategies, and Outcomes.丘脑胶质母细胞瘤:临床表现、治疗策略和预后。
Neurosurgery. 2018 Jul 1;83(1):76-85. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx349.
10
Survival Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Glioblastoma.胶质母细胞瘤的生存结果与预后因素
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jun 28;14(13):3161. doi: 10.3390/cancers14133161.

引用本文的文献

1
Potential of Curcumin and Its Analogs in Glioblastoma Therapy.姜黄素及其类似物在胶质母细胞瘤治疗中的潜力。
Antioxidants (Basel). 2025 Mar 18;14(3):351. doi: 10.3390/antiox14030351.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors affecting cognitive functions of patients with high-grade gliomas: a systematic review.影响高级别脑胶质瘤患者认知功能的因素:系统评价。
Neurol Sci. 2023 Jun;44(6):1917-1929. doi: 10.1007/s10072-023-06673-4. Epub 2023 Feb 11.
2
Prognostic Factors of Survival in Glioblastoma Multiforme Patients-A Retrospective Study.多形性胶质母细胞瘤患者生存的预后因素——一项回顾性研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Oct 30;12(11):2630. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12112630.
3
Survival Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Glioblastoma.胶质母细胞瘤的生存结果与预后因素
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jun 28;14(13):3161. doi: 10.3390/cancers14133161.
4
Sex Differences in Glioblastoma-Findings from the Swedish National Quality Registry for Primary Brain Tumors between 1999-2018.胶质母细胞瘤中的性别差异——1999年至2018年瑞典原发性脑肿瘤国家质量登记处的研究结果
J Clin Med. 2022 Jan 18;11(3):486. doi: 10.3390/jcm11030486.
5
IDH Wild-type Glioblastoma Presenting with Seizure: Clinical Specificity, and Oncologic and Surgical Outcomes.伴发癫痫的 IDH 野生型胶质母细胞瘤:临床特异性、肿瘤学和手术结局。
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2022 Jul;83(4):351-360. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735515. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
6
Initial cognitive impairment predicts shorter survival of patients with glioblastoma.初始认知障碍预示着胶质母细胞瘤患者的生存期较短。
Acta Neurol Scand. 2022 Jan;145(1):94-101. doi: 10.1111/ane.13529. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
7
The Potential of Glioblastoma Patient Symptoms to Diagnose and Predict Survival.胶质母细胞瘤患者症状在诊断和预测生存方面的潜力。
Cureus. 2021 Jul 27;13(7):e16675. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16675. eCollection 2021 Jul.
8
Glioblastoma: clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management.胶质母细胞瘤:临床表现、诊断与治疗
BMJ. 2021 Jul 14;374:n1560. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1560.
9
Diagnosis and Management of Glioblastoma: A Comprehensive Perspective.胶质母细胞瘤的诊断与管理:全面视角
J Pers Med. 2021 Apr 1;11(4):258. doi: 10.3390/jpm11040258.
10
Determining medical decision-making capacity in brain tumor patients: why and how?确定脑肿瘤患者的医疗决策能力:为何以及如何确定?
Neurooncol Pract. 2020 Jul 16;7(6):599-612. doi: 10.1093/nop/npaa040. eCollection 2020 Dec.