Akao Ken, Oya Yuko, Sato Takaya, Ikeda Aki, Horiguchi Tomoya, Goto Yasuhiro, Hashimoto Naozumi, Kondo Masashi, Imaizumi Kazuyoshi
Department of Respiratory Medicine, School of medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake 470-1192, Japan.
Explor Target Antitumor Ther. 2024;5(4):826-840. doi: 10.37349/etat.2024.00251. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
Despite innovative advances in molecular targeted therapy, treatment strategies using immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have not progressed significantly. Accumulating evidence suggests that ICI chemotherapy is inadequate in this population. Biomarkers of ICI therapy, such as programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), are not biomarkers in patients with EGFR mutations, and the specificity of the tumor microenvironment has been suggested as the reason for this. Combination therapy with PD-L1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors is a concern because of its severe toxicity and limited efficacy. However, early-stage NSCLC may differ from advanced-stage NSCLC. In this review, we comprehensively review the current evidence and summarize the potential of ICI therapy in patients with EGFR mutations after acquiring resistance to treatment with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with no mutation or whose disease has progressed on osimertinib.
尽管分子靶向治疗取得了创新性进展,但使用免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的治疗策略进展并不显著。越来越多的证据表明,ICI化疗对这一人群并不充分。ICI治疗的生物标志物,如程序性细胞死亡配体1(PD-L1)和肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(TILs),在EGFR突变患者中并非生物标志物,肿瘤微环境的特异性被认为是其原因。PD-L1和细胞毒性T淋巴细胞相关蛋白4(CTLA-4)抑制剂的联合治疗因其严重毒性和有限疗效而备受关注。然而,早期NSCLC可能与晚期NSCLC有所不同。在本综述中,我们全面回顾了当前证据,并总结了ICI治疗在EGFR突变患者中对无突变的EGFR酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)治疗产生耐药或疾病在奥希替尼治疗后进展的患者中的潜力。