Suppr超能文献

受限清单:患者的观点。

The limited list: the patients' views.

作者信息

Neville R G, Meekison D E

出版信息

Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Aug 24;291(6494):517-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6494.517.

Abstract

Two months after the introduction of the limited list eight general practitioners and six pharmacists in the Tayside region were asked about their patients' views on the introduction. Two general practitioners said that they had had virtually no problems or complaints, and another general practitioner said that six of 300 prescriptions had presented problems. The few problems that were reported by general practitioners and pharmacists had occurred mostly among the elderly, and a classification is given of the sorts of problems.

摘要

在推出限量清单两个月后,泰赛德地区的8名全科医生和6名药剂师被问及他们患者对该清单推出的看法。两名全科医生表示他们几乎没有遇到问题或收到投诉,另一名全科医生称在300张处方中有6张出现了问题。全科医生和药剂师报告的少数问题大多发生在老年人中,并给出了问题类型的分类。

相似文献

1
The limited list: the patients' views.受限清单:患者的观点。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Aug 24;291(6494):517-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6494.517.
2
The limited list: effects in general practice.
Drug Ther Bull. 1987 Mar 23;25(6):21-4.
3
Limited list: limited effects?有限列表:有限的影响?
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Aug 24;291(6494):518-20. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6494.518.
4
Development of a limited formulary for general practice.制定一份全科医疗的有限处方集。
Lancet. 1985 May 4;1(8436):1030-2. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)91625-3.
6
Discussing the limited list.讨论有限列表。
Lancet. 1985 Feb 16;1(8425):411-2.
9
Drug formularies--good or evil? A view using prescribing analyses and cost trends data.
Cardiology. 1994;85 Suppl 1:46-53. doi: 10.1159/000176758.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验