Singh Raj, Bishop Sophia, Jenkins Jan, Davis Joanne, Upadhyay Rituraj, McLaughlin Christopher, Sharma Sanjeev, Baliga Sujith, Palmer Joshua D
Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, USA.
Department of Radiation Oncology, The Radiosurgery Society, San Jose, USA.
Cureus. 2024 Aug 14;16(8):e66890. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66890. eCollection 2024 Aug.
There are limited studies examining local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) following stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) for adolescent and young adult (AYA) populations/histologies with local recurrences or metastatic disease.
The RSSearch® Patient Registry, an international SABR registry, was evaluated for AYA patients treated with SABR. AYA patients with adult histologies/primaries were excluded. Kaplan-Meier analyses were employed to characterize LC and OS following SABR. Potential prognostic factors were assessed with log-rank tests for initial univariate analysis (UVA). For multivariate analyses (MVA), a Cox proportional hazards multivariate model was utilized.
A total of 19 AYA patients with 39 lesions treated with SABR were identified and included in the analysis. Four lesions (10.3%) were treated with SABR for primary tumor recurrence and 35 lesions were treated for metastatic disease. The median patient age was 34 years (range: 16-39 years). Common lesion locations included lung (11 lesions; 28.2%), non-spinal bone (nine lesions; 23.1%), and spine (six lesions; 15.4%). The median biological effective dose (BED) was 61.5 Gy (range: 26.4-180). One-year LC and OS following SABR were 77.7% (95% CI: 58.5-88.7) and 72.7% (95% CI: 46.3-87.6), respectively. On UVA, BED ≥ 60 Gy was associated with superior one-year LC (94.4% vs. 47.6%; p<0.0001) as were sarcoma primaries (two-year LC: 92.3% vs. 42.2%;p = 0.0002). Central nervous system (CNS) primaries had significantly poorer one-year LC (20% vs 87.5%; p<0.0001) as well as spinal metastases (33.3% vs. 87.0%; p<0.0001). On MVA, BED < 60 Gy was associated with inferior LC (hazard ratio (HR) = 5.51;p = 0.01) with sarcoma primaries associated with superior LC (HR = 0.04;p = 0.008).
SABR with BED ≥ 60 Gy resulted in durable LC for AYA patients, particularly those with sarcoma primaries, though poor outcomes were noted in metastatic CNS malignancies.
关于立体定向消融放疗(SABR)治疗局部复发或转移性疾病的青少年和青年(AYA)人群/组织学类型后的局部控制(LC)和总生存期(OS)的研究有限。
对国际SABR注册机构RSSearch®患者注册库中接受SABR治疗的AYA患者进行评估。排除具有成人组织学/原发灶的AYA患者。采用Kaplan-Meier分析来描述SABR后的LC和OS。通过对数秩检验对潜在预后因素进行初步单因素分析(UVA)评估。对于多因素分析(MVA),使用Cox比例风险多变量模型。
共识别出19例接受SABR治疗的AYA患者,共39个病灶,并纳入分析。4个病灶(10.3%)接受SABR治疗是因为原发性肿瘤复发,35个病灶接受治疗是因为转移性疾病。患者中位年龄为34岁(范围:16 - 39岁)。常见病灶部位包括肺(11个病灶;28.2%)、非脊柱骨(9个病灶;23.1%)和脊柱(6个病灶;15.4%)。中位生物等效剂量(BED)为61.5 Gy(范围:26.4 - 180)。SABR后1年的LC和OS分别为77.7%(95%CI:58.5 - 88.7)和72.7%(95%CI:46.3 - 87.6)。在UVA中,BED≥60 Gy与较好的1年LC相关(94.4%对47.6%;p<0.0001),肉瘤原发灶也是如此(2年LC:92.3%对42.2%;p = 0.0002)。中枢神经系统(CNS)原发灶的1年LC明显较差(20%对87.5%;p<0.0001),脊柱转移灶也是如此(33.3%对87.0%;p<0.0001)。在MVA中,BED<60 Gy与较差的LC相关(风险比(HR)= 5.51;p = 0.01),肉瘤原发灶与较好的LC相关(HR = 0.04;p = 0.008)。
BED≥60 Gy的SABR为AYA患者带来了持久的LC,尤其是那些肉瘤原发灶患者,尽管转移性CNS恶性肿瘤的预后较差。