Soni Pranjal S, Sanyal Pronob
Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, School of Dental Sciences, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Karad, IND.
Cureus. 2024 Aug 13;16(8):e66811. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66811. eCollection 2024 Aug.
Introduction Laminate veneers are thin porcelain or composite resin shells bonded to the front of teeth for cosmetic enhancement. The design of the tooth preparation is crucial; it involves minimal enamel removal to ensure a proper fit and strong bond. This careful preparation increases the veneers' fracture resistance by preserving tooth structure and evenly distributing stress, ensuring durability and natural appearance. Aim Our aim was to determine the fracture resistance of two preparation designs with two different materials for the fabrication of laminate veneers. Materials and methods An in vitro study was conducted on 40 laminate veneers divided into two groups based on the material used: Group 1 (Cerec Tessera (Dentsply Sirona, Charlotte, NC, USA)) and Group 2 (Upcera, Shenzhen, China). Each group was further divided into two sub-groups based on tooth preparation designs: butt joint and feather edge. The fracture resistance of these veneers following thermocycling was determined, and the mode of fracture was evaluated using a stereomicroscope. Results Feather edge preparation with Cerec Tessera laminate veneer restoration demonstrated the highest fracture resistance at 111.5 N, followed by butt joint preparation with Cerec Tessera laminate veneer restoration, which showed a fracture resistance of 90.8 N. The study identified laminate fractures as the most common type of fracture observed in the veneer restorations, followed by cement interface fractures. Conclusion The study suggests that the feather edge preparation design contributed to higher fracture resistance compared to the butt joint design. This finding aligns with the idea that modifying the preparation design can have a significant impact on the overall strength and durability of veneer restorations. The use of Cerec Tessera, especially in combination with the feather edge design, yielded the maximum fracture resistance.
引言
层压贴面是粘结在牙齿前部用于美容的薄瓷或复合树脂壳。牙体预备的设计至关重要;它需要去除最少的牙釉质以确保合适的贴合度和牢固的粘结。这种精细的预备通过保留牙体结构和均匀分布应力来提高贴面的抗折性,确保其耐用性和自然外观。
目的
我们的目的是确定用于制作层压贴面的两种不同材料的两种预备设计的抗折性。
材料和方法
对40个层压贴面进行了一项体外研究,根据所用材料分为两组:第1组(Cerec Tessera(美国北卡罗来纳州夏洛特市登士柏西诺德公司))和第2组(中国深圳的Upcera)。每组又根据牙体预备设计进一步分为两个亚组:对接接头和羽状边缘。测定了这些贴面在热循环后的抗折性,并使用体视显微镜评估了折裂模式。
结果
采用Cerec Tessera层压贴面修复的羽状边缘预备显示出最高抗折性,为111.5 N,其次是采用Cerec Tessera层压贴面修复的对接接头预备,其抗折性为90.8 N。该研究确定层压贴面折裂是贴面修复中最常见的折裂类型,其次是粘结剂界面折裂。
结论
该研究表明,与对接接头设计相比,羽状边缘预备设计有助于提高抗折性。这一发现与这样的观点一致,即改变预备设计会对贴面修复的整体强度和耐用性产生重大影响。使用Cerec Tessera,尤其是与羽状边缘设计相结合,产生了最大抗折性。