Tuğcu Erhan, Vanlıoğlu Burçin, Özkan Yasemin Kulak, Aslan Yilmat Umut
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018;38(Suppl):s87–s95. doi: 10.11607/prd.2995. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the marginal adaptation and fracture load of ceramic laminate veneers on teeth with different preparation depths. A total of 75 extracted intact human maxillary central incisors were prepared with three different preparation depths (P) and assigned to the following five groups (n = 15): P1 (0.3-mm depth of preparation; preparation entirely in enamel); P2 (0.5-mm depth of preparation; preparation in enamel and dentin complex); P3 (1-mm depth of preparation; preparation entirely in dentin); P4 (no preparation, only surface roughening); and P5 (unrestored, intact teeth as control). A total of 60 lithium disilicate laminate veneers were fabricated. The marginal adaptation of the veneers was evaluated by light microscope and scanning electron microscope after cementation with resin cement. Finally, the veneers were loaded until fracture at a 90-degree angle to the lingual surface of the tooth. Statistical analyses were performed using analysis of variance and Tukey multiple range test. There was a significant difference between the marginal gap value of the distocervical measurement points of P1 and P2 and the distal measurement points of P3 and P4 (P = .33 and P = .017, respectively). The highest fracture resistance values were observed in the P5 group (mean: 389.55 ± 22 N) and the P2 group (mean: 322.86 ± 79.38 N), and the lowest values were observed in the P3 group (mean: 219.21 ± 60.74 N). The marginal adaptation of the laminate veneer restorations was not related to the depth of preparation. Mean fracture resistance of laminate veneers with 0.5-mm preparation depth was greater than that of the 0.3-mm and 1-mm preparation depth laminate veneers and those with no preparation.
本研究的目的是评估不同预备深度的牙齿上陶瓷贴面的边缘适合性和抗折载荷。总共75颗完整拔除的人上颌中切牙被制备成三种不同的预备深度(P),并分为以下五组(n = 15):P1(0.3毫米预备深度;预备完全在釉质内);P2(0.5毫米预备深度;预备在釉质和牙本质复合体中);P3(1毫米预备深度;预备完全在牙本质内);P4(不预备,仅表面粗糙化);P5(未修复,完整牙齿作为对照)。总共制作了60颗二硅酸锂贴面。用树脂水门汀粘结后,通过光学显微镜和扫描电子显微镜评估贴面的边缘适合性。最后,将贴面以与牙齿舌面成90度角加载直至折断。使用方差分析和Tukey多重范围检验进行统计分析。P1和P2的远中颈部测量点的边缘间隙值与P3和P4的远中测量点之间存在显著差异(分别为P = 0.33和P = 0.017)。在P5组(平均值:389.55±22 N)和P2组(平均值:322.86±79.38 N)中观察到最高的抗折强度值,在P3组(平均值:219.21±60.74 N)中观察到最低值。贴面修复体的边缘适合性与预备深度无关。预备深度为0.5毫米的贴面的平均抗折强度大于预备深度为0.3毫米和1毫米的贴面以及未预备的贴面。