Modified dorsal recumbent position versus lithotomy position for flexible ureteroscopic lithotomy: a multicenter prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND

The lithotomy position (LP) may pose limitations and discomfort for elderly patients and those with a history of lower limb surgery, potentially leading to an increased risk of complications. And the LP is the conventional position during flexible ureteroscopic lithotomy for the treatment of ureteral calculi. However, it has some disadvantages, such as peripheral nerve injury and deep venous thrombosis in the lower limbs, etc. Therefore, we performed a new approach, which is named as modified dorsal recumbent position (MDRP). Currently, there is a lack of systematic analysis and standardization regarding the surgical positioning for flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy. The objective of the study was to assess whether there were any disparities in the overall duration of the procedure when comparing the MDRP with the LP. The investigation of the optimal position for flexible ureteroscopic lithotomy is essential for enhancing patient safety and comfort.

METHODS

This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial. A total of 144 patients with renal or ureteral calculi from April 2021 to June 2022 were enrolled. Eligible patients were randomized to the MDRP group (n=72) or LP group (n=72). The patient's demographics, the placement of the surgical position (time of position placement, time of disinfection and towel laying, time of position return, degree of medical fatigue) and the operation safety (time of operation, time of ureteroscope from bladder neck to ureteral orifice, heart rate, blood pressure) of two groups were compared and analyzed.

RESULTS

Between the two groups, the body positioning time (93.8±31.6 134.8±40.1 s, P=0.02), operation time (71.8±36.7 77.7±48.6 min, P=0.04), the time from the bladder neck to the ureteral orifice of the flexible ureteroscope spent by the doctors (3.4±4.7 10.3±14.7 s, P<0.001) and incidence rate of patient's lower limb soreness (19.4% 49.7%, P=0.01) in the MDRP group were significantly shorter than those in the LP group. However, there was no significant difference in the stone removal rate (87.6% 85.4%, P=0.09) or postoperative hospitalization days (4.3±1.4 4.1±1.6 d, P=0.08) between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial showed that the MDRP could not only effectively shorten the operation time, shorten the time from the bladder neck to the ureteral orifice of the ureteroscopic lithotripsy, but also place the patient's body in a functional position, stabilize the blood pressure during the operation, improve the comfort of the patient.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR2100053416).