Neem Johann, Donley David, Reynolds Elaine R
History Department, Western Washington University, Bellingham WA.
Biology Department, Harding University, Searcy, AR 72149.
J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2024 Jul 21;22(2):E28-E33. doi: 10.59390/LHNR3855. eCollection 2024 Winter.
Chatbots and related technologies are predicted to become fixtures in our teaching. These tools scan information from the web or other sources and deliver content in textual summaries. ChatGPT4 and other AI products are surprisingly good at summaries of information and simple analysis, similar to what we often ask students to do as part of our teaching. They are poor at evaluation of information and citation of sources at the moment, but these tools are advancing rapidly. Use of these tools in the classroom generate important questions about how we handle content, understanding and skill development in the classroom, how information is curated, and the structure of information in our discipline. Additionally, accessibility of these tools will be an issue moving forward since they have the potential to widen a technology divide even further. Through presentation and group discussion, this minisymposium highlighted how we might integrate these tools and craft new pedagogies that will continue to engage and challenge our students. We also discussed concerns about these tools in terms of inclusive pedagogy and decolonization of neuroscience.
聊天机器人及相关技术预计将成为我们教学中的固定元素。这些工具会从网络或其他来源扫描信息,并以文本摘要的形式提供内容。ChatGPT4和其他人工智能产品在信息总结和简单分析方面出奇地出色,类似于我们经常要求学生在教学中做的事情。目前,它们在信息评估和来源引用方面表现不佳,但这些工具正在迅速发展。在课堂上使用这些工具引发了一些重要问题,比如我们如何处理课堂上的内容、理解和技能发展,如何策划信息,以及我们学科中的信息结构。此外,这些工具的可及性将是未来的一个问题,因为它们有可能进一步扩大技术差距。通过演讲和小组讨论,本次小型研讨会强调了我们如何整合这些工具并设计新的教学方法,以持续吸引和挑战我们的学生。我们还从包容性教学法和神经科学非殖民化的角度讨论了对这些工具的担忧。