ElMehy Aisha Emad, Sharif Asmaa Fady, Sobeeh Fatma Gaber
Forensic Medicine and Clinical Toxicology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, El Bahr St., Tanta, Gharbia Governorate 31111, Egypt.
Department of Clinical Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Dar AL-Uloom University, Al Falah, Riyadh 13314, Saudi Arabia.
Toxicol Rep. 2024 Aug 26;13:101718. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2024.101718. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Aluminum phosphide (AlP) poisoning is a life-threatening emergency prevalent in the Middle East region including Egypt. Early prediction of prognosis is critical for initiating the utmost intensive interventions. Though many scoring systems were studied for predicting the prognosis of AlP poisoning, these scores received wide criticism. Complexity and reliability were the main concerns. Therefore, this retrospective cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate the performance of the recently introduced PGI score as a predictor of case fatality, the need for mechanical ventilation and vasopressor therapy in acute AlP poisoning. Moreover, it compares the performance of PGI with the known poison severity score (PSS), and the simplified acute physiology score (SAPS) II. Among 144 exposed patients, we reported a mortality rate of 61.1%. Non-survivors exhibited significantly higher PGI, PSS, and SAPS II than survivors. Though the PGI, PSS, and SAPS II proved their significance as predictors of mortality and, the need for MV and vasopressors, the PGI score showed a significantly higher area under the curve (AUC) as a predictor of MV (AUC = 0.848) compared to PSS (AUC = 0.731) and SAPS II (AUC = 0.749). Additively, PGI of 2 or more was a significant predictor of mortality (AUC = 0.831, sensitivity = 65.9%, and specificity = 89.3 %) and MV (p < 0.001), while PGI of 1 or more was another predictor of vasopressor need (AUC = 0.881, sensitivity = 89.0% and specificity = 79.4%). Given the PGI score's high AUCs across all outcomes, coupled with its balanced sensitivity and specificity, the PGI score could be a simple, and robust tool replacing the PSS and SAPS II for predicting mortality, clinical decision-making including the need for MV and vasopressor therapy in acute AlP exposure. Adopting the PGI score seems substantially useful in managing acute AlP poisoning, notably in resource-restricted countries.
磷化铝(AlP)中毒是一种危及生命的紧急情况,在包括埃及在内的中东地区很常见。早期预测预后对于启动最强化的干预措施至关重要。尽管已经研究了许多评分系统来预测AlP中毒的预后,但这些评分受到了广泛批评。复杂性和可靠性是主要问题。因此,这项回顾性横断面研究旨在评估最近推出的PGI评分作为急性AlP中毒患者病死率、机械通气需求和血管升压药治疗需求预测指标的性能。此外,还将PGI的性能与已知的中毒严重程度评分(PSS)和简化急性生理学评分(SAPS)II进行了比较。在144名暴露患者中,我们报告的死亡率为61.1%。非幸存者的PGI、PSS和SAPS II显著高于幸存者。尽管PGI、PSS和SAPS II被证明是死亡率、机械通气和血管升压药需求的重要预测指标,但与PSS(AUC = 0.731)和SAPS II(AUC = 0.749)相比,PGI评分作为机械通气预测指标的曲线下面积(AUC)显著更高(AUC = 0.848)。此外,PGI为2或更高是死亡率(AUC = 0.831,敏感性 = 65.9%,特异性 = 89.3%)和机械通气(p < 0.001)的重要预测指标,而PGI为1或更高是血管升压药需求的另一个预测指标(AUC = 0.881,敏感性 = 89.0%,特异性 = 79.4%)。鉴于PGI评分在所有结果中的AUC都很高,再加上其平衡的敏感性和特异性,PGI评分可能是一种简单而强大的工具,可取代PSS和SAPS II来预测死亡率、进行临床决策,包括急性AlP暴露时机械通气和血管升压药治疗的需求。采用PGI评分在管理急性AlP中毒方面似乎非常有用,尤其是在资源有限的国家。