• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科接受气管插管的危重症成年患者中困难气道生理评分(DAPS)的验证

Validation of Difficult Airway Physiological Score (DAPS) in Critically Ill Adults Undergoing Endotracheal Intubation in the Emergency Department.

作者信息

Waheed Shahan, Razzak Junaid Abdul, Khan Nadeem Ullah, Raheem Ahmed, Mian Asad Iqbal

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.

Department of Emergency Medicine, New York Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA.

出版信息

Emerg Med Int. 2024 Apr 23;2024:6600829. doi: 10.1155/2024/6600829. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1155/2024/6600829
PMID:39281076
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11401705/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Critically ill patients have increased risk of cardiovascular collapse following endotracheal intubation due to physiological instability. This study aims to validate the Difficult Airway Physiological Score (DAPS) in adults to predict the risk of serious outcomes in the emergency department of a tertiary care private hospital.

METHODS

This is a cohort study conducted in the emergency department (ED) from 2021 to 2022. Difficult Airway Physiological Score (DAPS) was derived from a sample of 1021 patients through a retrospective study. The variables in the score were age, gender, time of intubation, vitals and vomiting at presentation, pH <7.3, fever, physician's anticipation for patient decline, and agitation. The model performance was assessed prospectively on a separate dataset ( = 326) using train-test split method. Postintubation desaturation, hypotension, cardiac arrest, and mortality postintubation were the serious outcomes. ROC analysis, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were used to assess score validity.

RESULTS

Our study includes 326 patients, of which 123 (37.7%) were males and 203 (62.2%) were females. The sample was divided into high-risk (DAPS ≥10) group,  = 194 with mean age of 52 (SD = ±18) years, and low-risk (DAPS <10) group,  = 132 with mean age of 47.7 (SD = ±17.4) years. The shock index ≥0.9 was in 128 (66%), while it was <0.9 in low-risk  = 111 (84%), value <0.001. Similarly, pH <7.3 was seen in 70 (36.1%) in high-risk group compared to 4 (3%) in low-risk group, value <0.001. Cardiac arrest was observed in 56 (17.2%) patients, of which 45 (23.2%) were in high-risk and 11 (8.3%) in low-risk groups ( < 0.001). Hypotension was the primary outcome in the high-risk group 100 (51.5%) versus 32 (24.2%) in low-risk group ( < 0.001). The DAPS of 10 had an area under the curve of 0.865 (0.71-0.84). The sensitivity of DAPS was 78.5%, specificity 77.9%, and accuracy 78.2%.

CONCLUSION

The score can accurately predict serious outcomes in critically ill adult patients with physiologically difficult airway demonstrating good sensitivity and specificity.

摘要

背景

由于生理不稳定,重症患者在气管插管后发生心血管衰竭的风险增加。本研究旨在验证成人困难气道生理评分(DAPS),以预测三级护理私立医院急诊科严重后果的风险。

方法

这是一项于2021年至2022年在急诊科进行的队列研究。通过回顾性研究从1021例患者样本中得出困难气道生理评分(DAPS)。该评分中的变量包括年龄、性别、插管时间、就诊时的生命体征和呕吐情况、pH<7.3、发热、医生对患者病情恶化的预期以及躁动情况。使用训练-测试分割方法在一个单独的数据集(n=326)上对模型性能进行前瞻性评估。插管后低氧血症、低血压、心脏骤停和插管后死亡率是严重后果。采用ROC分析、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值来评估评分的有效性。

结果

我们的研究包括326例患者,其中123例(37.7%)为男性,203例(62.2%)为女性。样本分为高危(DAPS≥10)组,n=194,平均年龄52岁(标准差=±18);低危(DAPS<10)组,n=132,平均年龄47.7岁(标准差=±17.4)。高危组中休克指数≥0.9的有128例(66%),而低危组中该指数<0.9的有111例(84%),P值<0.001。同样,高危组中pH<7.3的有70例(36.1%),而低危组中只有4例(3%),P值<0.001。观察到56例(17.2%)患者发生心脏骤停,其中高危组45例(23.2%),低危组11例(8.3%)(P<0.001)。低血压是高危组的主要结局,有100例(51.5%),而低危组有32例(24.2%)(P<0.001)。DAPS为10时曲线下面积为0.865(0.71-0.84)。DAPS的敏感性为78.5%,特异性为77.9%,准确性为78.2%。

结论

该评分能够准确预测气道生理困难的重症成年患者的严重后果,具有良好的敏感性和特异性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d913/11401705/7e01deccc8ed/EMI2024-6600829.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d913/11401705/51bf41dca7c6/EMI2024-6600829.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d913/11401705/7e01deccc8ed/EMI2024-6600829.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d913/11401705/51bf41dca7c6/EMI2024-6600829.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d913/11401705/7e01deccc8ed/EMI2024-6600829.002.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of Difficult Airway Physiological Score (DAPS) in Critically Ill Adults Undergoing Endotracheal Intubation in the Emergency Department.急诊科接受气管插管的危重症成年患者中困难气道生理评分(DAPS)的验证
Emerg Med Int. 2024 Apr 23;2024:6600829. doi: 10.1155/2024/6600829. eCollection 2024.
2
A Prospective Study Evaluating Gender Differences of Serious Outcomes through Difficult Airway Physiological Score (DAPS) in the Emergency Department.一项通过急诊科困难气道生理评分(DAPS)评估严重后果性别差异的前瞻性研究。
Crit Care Res Pract. 2024 May 20;2024:4622511. doi: 10.1155/2024/4622511. eCollection 2024.
3
Derivation of the Difficult Airway Physiological Score (DAPS) in adults undergoing endotracheal intubation in the emergency department.急诊科接受气管插管的成年患者困难气道生理评分(DAPS)的推导
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Mar 12;24(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-00958-3.
4
Prevalence of difficult airway predictors in cases of failed prehospital endotracheal intubation.院外气管插管失败病例中困难气道预测因素的发生率
J Emerg Med. 2014 Sep;47(3):294-300. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.04.021. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
5
Identification of the Physiologically Difficult Airway in the Pediatric Emergency Department.小儿急诊部生理困难气道的识别。
Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;27(12):1241-1248. doi: 10.1111/acem.14128. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
6
Pre-Existing Right Ventricular Dysfunction as an Independent Risk Factor for Post Intubation Cardiac Arrest and Hemodynamic Instability in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Observational Study.既往存在的右心室功能障碍作为危重症患者插管后心脏骤停和血流动力学不稳定的独立危险因素:一项回顾性观察研究。
J Intensive Care Med. 2023 Feb;38(2):169-178. doi: 10.1177/08850666221111776. Epub 2022 Jul 3.
7
Incidence of and risk factors for postintubation hypotension in critically ill patients with COVID-19.COVID-19 危重症患者插管后低血压的发生率及危险因素。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2022 Jan-Mar;34(1):131-140. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20220007-pt.
8
Association Between Difficult Airway Predictors and Failed Prehosptial Endotracheal Intubation.困难气道预测因素与院前气管插管失败之间的关联
Air Med J. 2015 Nov-Dec;34(6):343-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2015.06.001.
9
Diagnostic Efficacy and Clinical Value of Ultrasonography in Difficult Airway Assessment: Based on a Prospective Cohort Study.超声在困难气道评估中的诊断效能和临床价值:基于前瞻性队列研究。
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022 Aug 24;2022:4706438. doi: 10.1155/2022/4706438. eCollection 2022.
10
Reverse shock index (RSI) as a predictor of post-intubation cardiac arrest (PICA).反向休克指数(RSI)作为气管插管后心脏骤停(PICA)的预测指标。
Int J Emerg Med. 2023 Dec 7;16(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12245-023-00569-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Derivation of the Difficult Airway Physiological Score (DAPS) in adults undergoing endotracheal intubation in the emergency department.急诊科接受气管插管的成年患者困难气道生理评分(DAPS)的推导
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Mar 12;24(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-00958-3.
2
Managing the Physiologically Difficult Airway in Critically Ill Adults.成人危重症患者的生理困难气道管理。
Crit Care. 2023 Mar 21;27(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04371-3.
3
Hypotension Prediction Score for Endotracheal Intubation in Critically Ill Patients: A Post Hoc Analysis of the HEMAIR Study.
危重症患者气管插管低血压预测评分:HEMAIR研究的事后分析
J Intensive Care Med. 2022 Nov;37(11):1467-1479. doi: 10.1177/08850666221085256. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
4
The physiologically difficult airway: an emerging concept.生理困难气道:一个新兴概念。
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2022 Apr 1;35(2):115-121. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001102.
5
Intubation Practices and Adverse Peri-intubation Events in Critically Ill Patients From 29 Countries.29 个国家重症患者的插管操作实践和围插管期不良事件。
JAMA. 2021 Mar 23;325(12):1164-1172. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.1727.
6
Airway Management in an Anatomically and Physiologically Difficult Airway.解剖学和生理学上困难气道的气道管理
Cureus. 2020 Sep 24;12(9):e10638. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10638.
7
Evaluation and Management of the Physiologically Difficult Airway: Consensus Recommendations From Society for Airway Management.生理困难气道的评估与管理:气道管理学会的共识推荐意见。
Anesth Analg. 2021 Feb 1;132(2):395-405. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005233.
8
The difficult airway refocused.困难气道问题再次受到关注。
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Jul;125(1):e18-e21. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.04.008. Epub 2020 May 8.
9
Physiologically difficult airway in critically ill patients: winning the race between haemoglobin desaturation and tracheal intubation.危重症患者的生理困难气道:在血红蛋白去饱和与气管插管之间赢得这场竞赛。
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Jul;125(1):e1-e4. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.12.001. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
10
Guidelines for the management of tracheal intubation in critically ill adults.《成人危重症患者气管插管管理指南》
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Feb;120(2):323-352. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.10.021. Epub 2017 Nov 26.