• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新生儿鼻持续气道正压通气的结局:一项横断面研究。

Outcome of Nasal continuous positive airway pressure in neonates: A cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Fatima Kaneez, Zulfiqar Sughra, Farooq Ammara, Aziz Musfirah

机构信息

Kaneez Fatima, FCPS Neonatal Fellow Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.

Sughra Zulfiqar, MRCPCH Assistant professor Paediatrics, Watim Medical College, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.

出版信息

Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Sep;40(8):1831-1836. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.8.8753.

DOI:10.12669/pjms.40.8.8753
PMID:39281209
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11395344/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the efficacy of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in term and preterm neonates with respiratory distress by evaluating successful outcomes, identifying factors contributing to treatment failure, and documenting associated complications.

METHOD

A comparative cross-sectional study design was employed. The research was conducted at Combined Military Hospital (CMH) Rawalpindi from November 2022 to July 2023. All consecutive neonates admitted during the specified period with respiratory distress requiring CPAP treatment and meeting inclusion criteria were enrolled. Pre- and post-CPAP respiratory distress levels, relevant biochemical markers, as well as mortality and morbidity rates were documented. Both descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were employed.

RESULTS

The mean age of the study cohort was 53.3±85.6 minutes. The average time to initiate CPAP was 82.4 ± 94.7 minutes. Mean gestational age stood at 34.68±2.8 weeks. CPAP was successful in 97% of babies. The low birth weight below 1200grams was the main factor related to failure of CPAP. The mean Downes score decreased from 5.8±1.3 before CPAP to 3.3±1.6 after 12 hours of CPAP and further to 1.85±2 after 24 hours. Significant improvements in Downes score were noted after 24 hours of CPAP usage (p < 0.05) using paired sample T-test.

CONCLUSION

This study affirms the effectiveness of CPAP in addressing neonatal respiratory distress. The utilization of CPAP emerges as a valuable intervention that not only reduces the requirement for invasive ventilation but also exhibits the potential to alleviate morbidity and mortality rates among neonatal populations.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过评估成功结局、确定导致治疗失败的因素并记录相关并发症,来评估经鼻持续气道正压通气(CPAP)对足月儿和早产儿呼吸窘迫的疗效。

方法

采用比较性横断面研究设计。该研究于2022年11月至2023年7月在拉瓦尔品第联合军事医院(CMH)进行。纳入在指定期间因呼吸窘迫需要CPAP治疗且符合纳入标准的所有连续入院新生儿。记录CPAP治疗前后的呼吸窘迫水平、相关生化指标以及死亡率和发病率。同时采用描述性和推断性统计分析。

结果

研究队列的平均年龄为53.3±85.6分钟。开始使用CPAP的平均时间为82.4±94.7分钟。平均胎龄为34.68±2.8周。97%的婴儿使用CPAP治疗成功。出生体重低于1200克是与CPAP治疗失败相关的主要因素。Downes评分的平均值从CPAP治疗前的5.8±1.3降至CPAP治疗12小时后的3.3±1.6,并在24小时后进一步降至1.85±2。使用配对样本T检验,在CPAP使用24小时后,Downes评分有显著改善(p<0.05)。

结论

本研究证实了CPAP在解决新生儿呼吸窘迫方面的有效性。CPAP的应用是一种有价值的干预措施,不仅减少了有创通气的需求,而且还具有降低新生儿发病率和死亡率的潜力。

相似文献

1
Outcome of Nasal continuous positive airway pressure in neonates: A cross-sectional study.新生儿鼻持续气道正压通气的结局:一项横断面研究。
Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Sep;40(8):1831-1836. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.8.8753.
2
Outcome Of Use Of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Through Infant Flow Drivers In Neonates With Respiratory Distress In A Tertiary Care Hospital In Pakistan.在巴基斯坦一家三级护理医院中,通过婴儿流量驱动装置使用鼻持续气道正压通气治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫的效果。
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2018 Oct-Dec;30(4):511-555.
3
Effect of Nasal Continuous Airway Pressure With and Without Surfactant Administration for the Treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Neonates.经鼻持续气道正压通气联合或不联合表面活性剂治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的效果
Cureus. 2023 Oct 13;15(10):e46974. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46974. eCollection 2023 Oct.
4
Predictor Factors of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Failure in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress.患有呼吸窘迫的早产儿持续气道正压通气失败的预测因素
Glob Pediatr Health. 2021 Apr 7;8:2333794X211007464. doi: 10.1177/2333794X211007464. eCollection 2021.
5
Nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels for the prevention of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants.经鼻持续气道正压通气在早产儿中的应用:预防发病率和死亡率。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 30;11(11):CD012778. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012778.pub2.
6
Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for respiratory distress in preterm infants.持续气道正压通气(CPAP)用于治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 15;10(10):CD002271. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002271.pub3.
7
Outcome of Respiratory Distress in Neonates with Bubble CPAP at Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of a Tertiary Hospital.一家三级医院新生儿重症监护病房中使用气泡式持续气道正压通气治疗的新生儿呼吸窘迫的结局
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2019 Mar-Apr;57(216):92-97. doi: 10.31729/jnma.4294.
8
Nasal high flow therapy for primary respiratory support in preterm infants.经鼻高流量治疗在早产儿原发性呼吸支持中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 5;5(5):CD006405. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006405.pub4.
9
Effectiveness of High-Flow Nasal Cannula (RAM Cannula) With T-piece Resuscitator to Deliver Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) During Neonatal Transport.带T形管复苏器的高流量鼻导管(RAM导管)在新生儿转运期间提供持续气道正压通气(CPAP)的有效性。
Cureus. 2024 Jun 2;16(6):e61514. doi: 10.7759/cureus.61514. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) vs continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) vs nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as primary respiratory support in infants of ≥ 32 weeks gestational age (GA): study protocol for a three-arm multi-center randomized controlled trial.高流量鼻导管(HFNC)与持续气道正压通气(CPAP)及鼻间歇正压通气作为孕龄≥32周婴儿主要呼吸支持的比较:一项三臂多中心随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2023 Oct 6;24(1):647. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07665-7.

本文引用的文献

1
CPAP failure in the management of preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome where surfactant is scarce. A prospective observational study.表面活性物质缺乏的呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿应用 CPAP 失败的管理:一项前瞻性观察研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2023 May 3;23(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-04038-6.
2
Systematic review of high-flow nasal cannula versus continuous positive airway pressure for primary support in preterm infants.系统评价鼻塞持续气道正压通气与高流量鼻导管在早产儿一级支持中的应用。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2022 Jan;107(1):56-59. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-321094. Epub 2021 May 20.
3
Heated Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs. Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Post-extubation Respiratory Support in Preterm Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
加热湿化高流量鼻导管与鼻塞持续气道正压通气用于早产儿拔管后呼吸支持的随机对照试验。
J Trop Pediatr. 2021 Jan 29;67(1). doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmaa082.
4
Bubble Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (bNCPAP): An Effective Low-Cost Intervention for Resource-Constrained Settings.气泡式鼻持续气道正压通气(bNCPAP):一种适用于资源有限环境的有效低成本干预措施。
Int J Pediatr. 2020 Sep 8;2020:8871980. doi: 10.1155/2020/8871980. eCollection 2020.
5
Bubble Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (bCPAP) versus Control in Neonates with Respiratory Distress.气泡鼻塞持续气道正压通气(bCPAP)与对照组用于治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫的比较
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2020 Aug;30(8):805-809. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2020.08.805.
6
Barriers and facilitators to implementing bubble CPAP to improve neonatal health in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review.撒哈拉以南非洲地区实施鼻塞式持续气道正压通气以改善新生儿健康的障碍与促进因素:一项系统评价
Public Health Rev. 2020 Apr 28;41:6. doi: 10.1186/s40985-020-00124-7. eCollection 2020.
7
Barriers and enablers of implementing bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP): Perspectives of health professionals in Malawi.实施气泡持续气道正压通气(CPAP)的障碍和促进因素:马拉维卫生专业人员的观点。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 13;15(2):e0228915. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228915. eCollection 2020.
8
High Flow Nasal Cannula versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Primary Respiratory Support in Preterm Infants: A Prospective Randomized Study.高流量鼻导管与经鼻持续气道正压通气用于早产儿原发性呼吸支持的前瞻性随机研究。
Am J Perinatol. 2021 Feb;38(3):237-241. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1696673. Epub 2019 Sep 28.
9
Outcome of Respiratory Distress in Neonates with Bubble CPAP at Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of a Tertiary Hospital.一家三级医院新生儿重症监护病房中使用气泡式持续气道正压通气治疗的新生儿呼吸窘迫的结局
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2019 Mar-Apr;57(216):92-97. doi: 10.31729/jnma.4294.
10
High-flow nasal cannula versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory support in preterm infants: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.高流量鼻导管与鼻塞持续气道正压通气在早产儿呼吸支持中的比较:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Jan;34(2):259-266. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1606193. Epub 2019 Apr 24.