• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effect of simulation based workshop on changing faculty perception for simulation-based education.基于模拟的工作坊对改变教师对基于模拟的教育的认知的影响。
Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Sep;40(8):1741-1746. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.8.8598.
2
Simulation-based education workshop: perceptions of participants.基于模拟的教育工作坊:参与者的看法
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019 Jul 23;10:547-554. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S204816. eCollection 2019.
3
Students' Perception of Peer and Faculty Debriefing Facilitators Following Simulation- Based Education.基于模拟教学后学生对同伴和教师反馈促进者的认知
J Allied Health. 2018 Summer;47(2):107-112.
4
Effect of Faculty Development Activities on Dental Hygiene Faculty Perceptions of and Teaching About Motivational Interviewing: A Pilot Study.教师发展活动对口腔卫生专业教师对动机性访谈的认知及教学的影响:一项试点研究。
J Dent Educ. 2017 Aug;81(8):969-977. doi: 10.21815/JDE.017.048.
5
The effect of an interprofessional simulation-based education program on perceptions and stereotypes of nursing and medical students: A quasi-experimental study.基于跨专业模拟的教育项目对护理和医学专业学生认知及刻板印象的影响:一项准实验研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Nov;58:32-37. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.07.013. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
6
Using peer feedback to enhance nursing students' reflective abilities, clinical competencies, and sense of empowerment: A mixed-methods study.利用同伴反馈提高护理学生的反思能力、临床能力和赋权感:一项混合方法研究。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 May;69:103623. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103623. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
7
Effectiveness of High-Fidelity Simulation in Nursing Education for End-of-Life Care: A Quasi-experimental Design.高保真模拟在临终护理护理教育中的有效性:一项准实验设计。
Indian J Palliat Care. 2020 Jul-Sep;26(3):312-318. doi: 10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_157_19. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
8
Evaluation of a simulation-based workshop on clinical performance for emergency physicians and nurses.基于模拟的急诊医师和护士临床技能培训课程的效果评估。
World J Emerg Med. 2015;6(1):16-22. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2015.01.003.
9
Effects of a Debriefing Workshop for Simulation Educators in Nursing.护理模拟教育者研讨后效果。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2021 May 20;39(11):780-785. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000743.
10
Hybrid simulation training: An effective teaching and learning modality for intrauterine contraceptive device insertion.混合模拟训练:宫内节育器放置的一种有效教学模式。
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2018 May-Aug;31(2):119-124. doi: 10.4103/efh.EfH_357_17.

引用本文的文献

1
Facilitators, barriers, and future direction of high-fidelity simulation in nursing education: a qualitative descriptive study.护理教育中高保真模拟的促进因素、障碍及未来方向:一项质性描述性研究。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 8;24(1):881. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03541-8.
2
Enhancing student nurses' ethical skills via simulation-based learning: barriers and opportunities.通过基于模拟的学习提高实习护士的伦理技能:障碍与机遇
BMC Nurs. 2025 Feb 7;24(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-02742-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring faculty perception of simulation-based education: Benefits and challenges of using simulation for improving patient safety in cardiovascular diploma program.探索教师对基于模拟的教育的看法:在心血管文凭课程中使用模拟来提高患者安全的益处与挑战。
Pak J Med Sci. 2023 Mar-Apr;39(2):354-360. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.2.6693.
2
Effectiveness of interprofessional simulation-based education programs to improve teamwork and communication for students in the healthcare profession: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.跨专业模拟教育项目对提高医疗专业学生团队合作与沟通能力的有效性:随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Jan;120:105619. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105619. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
3
Healthcare Simulation: A Key to the Future of Medical Education - A Review.医疗模拟:医学教育未来的关键——综述
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2022 Apr 5;13:301-308. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S353777. eCollection 2022.
4
The effect of simulator fidelity on procedure skill training: a literature review.模拟器逼真度对程序技能训练的影响:文献综述。
Int J Med Educ. 2020 May 18;11:97-106. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5ea6.ae73.
5
Simulation-based education workshop: perceptions of participants.基于模拟的教育工作坊:参与者的看法
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019 Jul 23;10:547-554. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S204816. eCollection 2019.
6
New Paradigms in Post-Graduate Surgical Education.研究生外科教育的新范式
Mo Med. 2017 Jul-Aug;114(4):278-282.
7
Using debriefing and feedback in simulation to improve participant performance: an educator's perspective.利用模拟中的汇报和反馈来提高参与者的表现:教育者的视角
Int J Med Educ. 2015 Sep 25;6:118-20. doi: 10.5116/ijme.55fb.3d3a.
8
Simulation-based medical teaching and learning.基于模拟的医学教学与学习。
J Family Community Med. 2010 Jan;17(1):35-40. doi: 10.4103/1319-1683.68787.
9
Training and simulation for patient safety.患者安全培训与模拟
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Aug;19 Suppl 2:i34-43. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2009.038562.
10
What's new in emergencies, trauma, and shock? Role of simulation and ultrasound in acute care.急诊、创伤和休克领域有哪些新进展?模拟和超声在急性护理中的作用。
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2008 Jan;1(1):3-5. doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.41779.

基于模拟的工作坊对改变教师对基于模拟的教育的认知的影响。

Effect of simulation based workshop on changing faculty perception for simulation-based education.

作者信息

Aftab Rabia, Kirmani Fouzia, Ansari Tahir, Ahmed Masood

机构信息

Dr. Rabia Aftab, BDS. Department of Medical Education, Fazaia Ruth Pfau Medical College, Air University PAF Base Karachi, Pakistan.

Dr. Fouzia Kirmani, MBBS. Department of Medical Education, Fazaia Ruth Pfau Medical College, Air University PAF Base Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Sep;40(8):1741-1746. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.8.8598.

DOI:10.12669/pjms.40.8.8598
PMID:39281250
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11395376/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the perceptions of participants before and after a one-day workshop on Simulation-based Education. The other objective was to determine the feedback of participants about the one day workshop on Simulation-based Education.

METHODS

In March 2023, a one-day workshop on Simulation-Based-Education (SBE) was conducted by the Department of Medical Education of Fazaia Ruth Pfau Medical Education in collaboration with the foreign guest faculty through zoom. This workshop was conducted with the participants (faculty members) of the Certificate program. The study adopted quasi experimental (pretest posttest) research design. For data collection we used a validated questionnaire which compromises of three parts. Data was analyzed using SPSS 23. This is a semi-structured questionnaire which consists of four parts. The first part entails the demographic data of the participants. The second structured part collects the perception of participants through 26 statements on 5 points Likert scale (strongly disagree = 1, disagree = 2, agree to some extent = 3, agree = 4, strongly agree = 5).

RESULTS

The mean difference in participant perceptions was significant (P<0.05)on 13 statements: Improves communication skills (pretest 3.05±1.050, posttest 4.20±1.056; ), enhance teamwork (pretest 3.30±0.979, posttest 4.30±0.923; , overcomes the challenge of uncooperative patients during real practice (pretest 3.80±0.696, posttest 4.30±0.470; 0.008), enact live patients (pretest 2.70±0.923, posttest 3.65±1.040; 0.004), incopororation into medical education (pretest 3.20±0.894, posttest 4.40±0.503; 0.000), provide safe, reliastic and conducive learning environment (pretest 2.85±0.875, postest4.00±0.795; 0.000), provide easy learning (pretest 2.75±0.716, posttest 4.05±0.605 0.000), decrease ethical issues with more repeated practice (pretest 2.75±0.716, posttest 3.90±0.788; 0.000), reduces the effort put in by a faculty in clinical teaching (pretest 2.80±0.696, posttest 3.45±0.999; 0.039), supplement to clinical practice (pretest 2.75±0.444, posttest 4.55±0.510; 0.000), evidence required for simulation activities (pretest 2.95±0.605, posttest 4.10±0.641; ), able to add simulation in clinical subject (pretest 3.15±1.089, posttest 3.80±0.834; 0.055), can instruct complex skills without simulation (pretest 2.55±0.887, posttest 3.40±0.883; 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

The study signifiacnaty changed the faculty members' perceptions of simulation-based education.These encouraging findings may influence their future practice in simulation-based education, allowing them to provide safe, high-quality health care in the workplace and, eventually, enhance patient outcomes.

摘要

目的

比较参与者在为期一天的基于模拟的教育工作坊前后的看法。另一个目的是确定参与者对为期一天的基于模拟的教育工作坊的反馈。

方法

2023年3月,法扎亚·露丝·普法乌医学教育系与客座外籍教员通过Zoom合作举办了为期一天的基于模拟的教育(SBE)工作坊。该工作坊面向证书课程的参与者(教员)开展。本研究采用准实验(前测后测)研究设计。为收集数据,我们使用了一份经过验证的问卷,该问卷由三部分组成。使用SPSS 23对数据进行分析。这是一份半结构化问卷,由四部分组成。第一部分涉及参与者的人口统计学数据。第二部分结构化内容通过26条陈述以5点李克特量表收集参与者的看法(强烈不同意=1,不同意=2,在一定程度上同意=3,同意=4,强烈同意=5)。

结果

在13条陈述上,参与者看法的平均差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05):提高沟通技巧(前测3.05±1.050,后测4.20±1.056);增强团队合作(前测3.30±0.979,后测4.30±0.923);在实际操作中克服不合作患者的挑战(前测3.80±0.696,后测4.30±0.470;P=0.008);模拟真实患者(前测2.70±0.923,后测3.65±1.040;P=0.004);融入医学教育(前测3.20±0.894,后测4.40±0.503;P=0.000);提供安全、逼真且有益的学习环境(前测2.85±0.875,后测4.00±0.795;P=0.000);提供轻松学习(前测2.75±0.716,后测4.05±0.605,P=0.000);通过更多重复练习减少伦理问题(前测2.75±0.716,后测3.90±0.788;P=0.000);减少教员在临床教学中的投入(前测2.80±0.696,后测3.45±0.999;P=0.039);作为临床实践的补充(前测2.75±0.444,后测4.55±0.510;P=0.000);模拟活动所需的证据(前测2.95±0.605,后测4.10±0.641);能够在临床学科中增加模拟(前测3.15±1.089,后测3.80±0.834;P=0.055);无需模拟就能指导复杂技能(前测2.55±0.887,后测3.40±0.883;P=0.018)。

结论

该研究显著改变了教员对基于模拟的教育的看法。这些令人鼓舞的发现可能会影响他们未来在基于模拟的教育中的实践,使他们能够在工作场所提供安全、高质量的医疗保健,并最终改善患者的治疗效果。