Liu Yuhui, Zhang Mengwei, Miao Yutang, Chen Tong, Meng Tingting, Zhang Tao
Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University Dezhou Hospital, Dezhou, China.
Hospital Infection Management Department, Decheng District Hospital of TCM, Dezhou, China.
Gland Surg. 2024 Aug 31;13(8):1477-1493. doi: 10.21037/gs-24-231. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
Follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC) is the second most common thyroid malignancy and is particularly aggressive in advanced stages such as T3 and T4. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the long-term survival outcomes of total thyroidectomy (TT) and radioactive iodine therapy (RAIT) in unilateral T3 or T4 FTC using propensity score-matched analysis.
Utilizing the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, we identified patients diagnosed with T3 or T4 FTC and categorized them into two cohorts, namely those who were treated with TT and those who were not (non-TT). The non-TT group was further analyzed to determine the impact of RAIT on survival. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to adjust for confounding variables. Survival analysis, including Kaplan-Meier survival curves and landmark analysis, evaluated the effects on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).
A total of 2,957 patients were included, with 2,271 (76.8%) undergoing TT and 686 (23.2%) receiving alternative treatments. Before and after PSM, there were no significant differences in OS and CSS between the two groups. Post-PSM landmark analysis revealed that beyond 90 months, the TT group had superior CSS compared with the non-TT group (P=0.06). Cox multivariate regression identified follicular adenocarcinoma trabecular [hazard ratio (HR) =4.7041; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1218-19.727] and minimally invasive follicular carcinoma (HR =2.0202; 95% CI: 1.2140-3.362) as independent risk factors affecting prognosis. In the second part of the study, 671 patients were analyzed, namely 197 (29.4%) who received RAIT and 474 (70.6%) who did not. Landmark analysis indicated that after 30 months, the RAIT group had superior CSS compared with the non-RAIT group (P<0.05).
TT does not improve the survival rates of patients with stage T3/T4 FTC. For those patients who have not undergone TT, RAIT proves beneficial for CSS; however, further in-depth studies are required.
滤泡状甲状腺癌(FTC)是第二常见的甲状腺恶性肿瘤,在T3和T4等晚期阶段具有特别强的侵袭性。这项回顾性研究旨在使用倾向评分匹配分析评估单侧T3或T4 FTC患者行全甲状腺切除术(TT)和放射性碘治疗(RAIT)后的长期生存结果。
利用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库,我们识别出诊断为T3或T4 FTC的患者,并将他们分为两个队列,即接受TT治疗的患者和未接受TT治疗的患者(非TT组)。对非TT组进一步分析以确定RAIT对生存的影响。应用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来调整混杂变量。生存分析,包括Kaplan-Meier生存曲线和标志性分析,评估对总生存(OS)和癌症特异性生存(CSS)的影响。
共纳入2957例患者,其中2271例(76.8%)接受了TT治疗,686例(23.2%)接受了其他治疗。PSM前后,两组的OS和CSS无显著差异。PSM后的标志性分析显示,90个月后,TT组的CSS优于非TT组(P = 0.06)。Cox多因素回归确定滤泡性腺瘤小梁状[风险比(HR)= 4.7041;95%置信区间(CI):1.1218 - 19.727]和微小浸润性滤泡癌(HR = 2.0202;95%CI:1.2140 - 3.362)为影响预后的独立危险因素。在研究的第二部分,分析了671例患者,即197例(29.4%)接受了RAIT治疗,474例(70.6%)未接受RAIT治疗。标志性分析表明,30个月后,RAIT组的CSS优于非RAIT组(P < 0.05)。
TT并不能提高T3/T4期FTC患者的生存率。对于未接受TT治疗的患者,RAIT对CSS有益;然而,需要进一步深入研究。