Yang Geun-Hyeok, Yoon Young-In, Hwang Shin, Kim Ki-Hun, Ahn Chul-Soo, Moon Deok-Bog, Ha Tae-Yong, Song Gi-Won, Jung Dong-Hwan, Park Gil-Chun, Lee Sung-Gyu
Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Kyunghee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyunghee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2024 Sep;107(3):167-177. doi: 10.4174/astr.2024.107.3.167. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
This study aimed to describe adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for acute liver failure and evaluate its clinical significance by comparing its surgical and survival outcomes with those of deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT).
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 267 consecutive patients (161 LDLT recipients and 106 DDLT recipients) aged 18 years or older who underwent liver transplantation between January 2006 and December 2020.
The mean periods from hepatic encephalopathy to liver transplantation were 5.85 days and 8.35 days for LDLT and DDLT, respectively (P = 0.091). Among these patients, 121 (45.3%) had grade III or IV hepatic encephalopathy (living, 34.8% deceased, 61.3%; P < 0.001), and 38 (14.2%) had brain edema (living, 16.1% deceased, 11.3%; P = 0.269) before liver transplantation. There were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality (living, 11.8% deceased, 15.1%; P = 0.435), 10-year overall survival (living, 90.8% deceased, 84.0%; P = 0.096), and graft survival (living, 83.5% deceased, 71.3%; P = 0.051). However, postoperatively, the mean intensive care unit stay was shorter in the LDLT group (5.0 days 9.5 days, P < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was associated with vasopressor use (odds ratio [OR], 3.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45-7.96; P = 0.005) and brain edema (OR, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.16-6.52; P = 0.022) of recipient at the time of transplantation. However, LDLT (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.59-2.66; P = 0.553) was not independently associated with in-hospital mortality.
LDLT is feasible for acute liver failure when organs from deceased donors are not available.
本研究旨在描述成人活体肝移植(LDLT)治疗急性肝衰竭的情况,并通过比较其手术和生存结果与尸体供肝肝移植(DDLT)的结果来评估其临床意义。
我们回顾性分析了2006年1月至2020年12月期间连续接受肝移植的267例18岁及以上患者的病历(161例LDLT受者和106例DDLT受者)。
LDLT和DDLT从肝性脑病到肝移植的平均时间分别为5.85天和8.35天(P = 0.091)。在这些患者中,121例(45.3%)在肝移植前患有III级或IV级肝性脑病(活体供肝组为34.8%,尸体供肝组为61.3%;P < 0.001),38例(14.2%)患有脑水肿(活体供肝组为16.1%,尸体供肝组为11.3%;P = 0.269)。住院死亡率(活体供肝组为11.8%,尸体供肝组为15.1%;P = 0.435)、10年总生存率(活体供肝组为90.8%,尸体供肝组为84.0%;P = 0.096)和移植物生存率(活体供肝组为83.5%,尸体供肝组为71.3%;P = 0.051)无显著差异。然而,术后LDLT组的平均重症监护病房停留时间较短(5.0天对9.5天,P < 0.001)。住院死亡率与移植时受者使用血管活性药物(比值比[OR],3.40;95%置信区间[CI],1.45 - 7.96;P = 0.005)和脑水肿(OR,2.75;95%CI,1.16 - 6.52;P = 0.022)相关。然而,LDLT(OR,1.26;95%CI,0.59 - 2.66;P = 0.553)与住院死亡率无独立相关性。
当无法获得尸体供肝时,LDLT治疗急性肝衰竭是可行的。