Yin Mingzhu, Zhang Yiding, Wang Wenhua, Zhao Shuang, Su Juan, Li Shao, Chen Xiang
Department of Dermatology, Hunan Engineering Research Center of Skin Health and Disease, Hunan Key Laboratory of Skin Cancer and Psoriasis, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Clinical Research Center (CRC), Clinical Pathology Center (CPC), Cancer Early Detection and Treatment Center (CEDTC) and Translational Medicine Research Center (TMRC), Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital, Chongqing University, Wanzhou, Chongqing, China.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2025 Jul;39(7):1254-1266. doi: 10.1111/jdv.20335. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
Acral melanoma, characterized by its aggressiveness and poor prognosis compared to other melanoma subtypes, poses significant challenges in clinical management. However, the molecular underpinnings driving the biological and clinical features of this disease remain poorly understood.
In this study, our aim was to elucidate the molecular landscape and the correlation between subtypes and clinical features of acral melanoma.
We conducted comprehensive analyses to dissect the molecular characteristics of acral melanoma, employing a combination of multi-omics data analysis and network-based disease gene prediction algorithms. Single-cell RNA-Seq data were utilized to investigate the contribution of immunocytes to the molecular classification of acral melanoma. Additionally, we used clinical samples to validate the correlation between new subtypes and the prognosis of acral melanoma and the expression of subtype markers and verified the interaction between macrophages and acral melanoma cells at cellular level.
Our study reveals the existence of two distinct subtypes of acral melanoma exhibiting marked differences in clinical behaviour, cellular and molecular mechanisms. We identified a robust biomarker panel (EREG, VSIG4, FCGR3A and RAB20) that accurately distinguishes these two subtypes with an impressive AUC of 0.946, validated using clinical samples. Subtype I, characterized by thinner Breslow thickness, demonstrates a favourable prognosis, whereas Subtype II represents a high-risk subtype with a propensity for dermal invasion. Notably, the signature gene EREG of Subtype I is enriched in FCN1 macrophages, known for promoting inflammatory and immune responses. Conversely, signature genes VSIG4 and FCGR3A of Subtype II are enriched in SPP1 macrophages, which exhibit significant crosstalk with tumour cells.
Our findings significantly enhance the understanding of the molecular landscape of acral melanoma and offer novel insights into its clinical management by identifying distinct subtypes and potential therapeutic targets. The findings have to be confirmed in different cohorts in the future for full validation.
肢端黑色素瘤与其他黑色素瘤亚型相比,具有侵袭性强和预后差的特点,给临床管理带来了重大挑战。然而,驱动该疾病生物学和临床特征的分子基础仍知之甚少。
在本研究中,我们旨在阐明肢端黑色素瘤的分子图谱以及亚型与临床特征之间的相关性。
我们进行了全面分析,采用多组学数据分析和基于网络的疾病基因预测算法相结合的方法,剖析肢端黑色素瘤的分子特征。利用单细胞RNA测序数据研究免疫细胞对肢端黑色素瘤分子分类的贡献。此外,我们使用临床样本验证新亚型与肢端黑色素瘤预后以及亚型标志物表达之间的相关性,并在细胞水平验证巨噬细胞与肢端黑色素瘤细胞之间的相互作用。
我们的研究揭示了肢端黑色素瘤存在两种不同的亚型,它们在临床行为、细胞和分子机制上表现出明显差异。我们确定了一个强大的生物标志物组合(EREG、VSIG4、FCGR3A和RAB20),使用临床样本验证,该组合能以0.946的令人印象深刻的曲线下面积(AUC)准确区分这两种亚型。亚型I的特点是Breslow厚度较薄,预后良好,而亚型II是具有真皮侵袭倾向的高危亚型。值得注意的是,亚型I的标志性基因EREG在以促进炎症和免疫反应而闻名的FCN1巨噬细胞中富集。相反,亚型II的标志性基因VSIG4和FCGR3A在与肿瘤细胞有显著串扰的SPP1巨噬细胞中富集。
我们的研究结果显著增强了对肢端黑色素瘤分子图谱的理解,并通过识别不同亚型和潜在治疗靶点,为其临床管理提供了新的见解。这些发现未来还需在不同队列中进行确认以实现全面验证。