Ottendahl Charlotte Brandstrup, Bjerregaard Peter, Svartá Durita Lyngsø, Seidler Ivalu Katajavaara, Olesen Ingelise, Nielsen Martine Stecher, Larsen Christina Viskum Lytken
National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Institute for Health and Nature, Ilisimatusarfik, University of Greenland, Nuuk, Greenland.
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2024 Dec;83(1):2400397. doi: 10.1080/22423982.2024.2400397. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
Poor mental health among youth in Greenland is a major challenge, childhood conditions are critical for mental health later in life. The study aimed to examine the clustering of childhood conditions by considering risk and protective factors for mental health among youth and young adults in Greenland and to explore the relationship between these clusters and mental health outcomes in youth. The study included 565 participants aged 15-34 living in Greenland. Seven indicators including childhood adversities (ACEs), childhood residence, language, and cultural indicators (protective factors) were used to define clusters via latent class analysis (LCA). The associations between clusters and mental health outcomes (satisfaction with life (Cantrill's ladder), self-esteem, self-efficacy, loneliness, psychological distress (General Health Questionnaire) and mental illness (Kessler 6)) were assessed by logistic regression. Four clusters were identified through LCA. While most participants reported positive childhoods, 40% (in two clusters) experienced ACEs. The two clusters differed as more participants in one cluster had experienced protective factors than the other. ACEs were associated with increased odds of negative aspects of mental health in youth. However, participants who faced high levels of adversity and few protective factors also had reduced odds of positive aspects of mental health in youth.
格陵兰岛青少年心理健康状况不佳是一项重大挑战,童年时期的状况对其成年后的心理健康至关重要。该研究旨在通过考虑格陵兰岛青少年和青年心理健康的风险和保护因素,来检验童年状况的聚类情况,并探索这些聚类与青少年心理健康结果之间的关系。该研究纳入了565名居住在格陵兰岛、年龄在15至34岁之间的参与者。通过潜在类别分析(LCA),使用包括童年逆境(ACEs)、童年居住情况、语言和文化指标(保护因素)在内的七个指标来定义聚类。通过逻辑回归评估聚类与心理健康结果(生活满意度(坎特里尔阶梯)、自尊、自我效能感、孤独感、心理困扰(一般健康问卷)和精神疾病(凯斯勒6项量表))之间的关联。通过LCA确定了四个聚类。虽然大多数参与者报告童年生活积极,但40%(在两个聚类中)经历过ACEs。这两个聚类有所不同,因为其中一个聚类中有更多参与者经历过保护因素。ACEs与青少年心理健康负面方面的几率增加有关。然而,面临高水平逆境且保护因素较少的参与者在青少年心理健康积极方面的几率也较低。