Suppr超能文献

篮球运动相关脑震荡的损伤机制是否会影响恢复?一项初步研究。

Does Mechanism of Injury Affect Recovery After Sport-Related Concussion in Basketball? A Pilot Study.

作者信息

Bishay Anthony E, Albert Avi N, Rigney Grant H, Corley James T, Williams Kristen L, Jo Jacob, Terry Douglas P, Zuckerman Scott L

机构信息

Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville , Tennessee , USA.

Meharry Medical College, Nashville , Tennessee , USA.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 2025 Apr 1;96(4):850-859. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000003175. Epub 2024 Sep 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Understanding sport-related concussion (SRC) mechanisms can aid in prevention and treatment. Concussions in basketball have received relatively less attention compared with collision sports. In a cohort of concussed high school basketball players, this pilot study sought to (1) describe the mechanisms of how concussions occur in basketball and (2) assess the relationship between mechanisms and acute symptomatology and recovery time.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort, pilot study examined concussed adolescent athletes (aged 14-18 years) treated at a sports concussion center from 11/2017 to 04/2022. The primary independent variable was mechanism of injury, categorized into (1) contact (head-to-head, head-to-body, head-to-ball, head-to-ground), (2) player (offensive play, defensive play, both), and (3) awareness mechanisms (aware, unaware). The outcomes included acute symptom severity, time to return-to-learn, symptom resolution, and return-to-play. Associations between mechanisms and outcomes were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance, independent t -tests, multivariable linear regressions, and Cox regression.

RESULTS

Of 105 basketball players (16.2 ± 1.4 years; 50.5% male), head-to-ground contact (n = 44/105; 41.9%) was most common. Taking-a-charge (n = 12/53; 22.6%) was the most frequent player mechanism, with similar rates for offensive (n = 24/53; 45.3%) and defensive (n = 23/53; 43.4%) plays. Most were aware of impending collision (n = 37/46; 80.4%). Head-to-body concussions were associated with higher initial symptoms severity scores when compared with head-to-head (β = 0.33, P = .003) and head-to-ground (β = 0.23, P = .050) contacts. Player and awareness mechanisms were not significant predictors of outcome measures. Only higher initial symptom scores were associated with a longer time to return-to-learn, symptom resolution, and return-to-play.

CONCLUSION

In this pilot study of concussed high school basketball players, head-to-ground was the most common concussion mechanism, with similar rates during offensive and defensive plays. Although head-to-body contact increased acute symptoms, other mechanisms did not predict recovery time. Given the limited information on concussions in basketball, the preliminary results of this pilot study may help inform larger studies on basketball SRC mechanisms.

摘要

背景与目的

了解与运动相关的脑震荡(SRC)机制有助于预防和治疗。与碰撞类运动相比,篮球运动中的脑震荡受到的关注相对较少。在一组脑震荡的高中篮球运动员中,这项初步研究旨在:(1)描述篮球运动中脑震荡发生的机制;(2)评估这些机制与急性症状及恢复时间之间的关系。

方法

一项回顾性队列初步研究,对2017年11月至2022年4月在一家运动脑震荡中心接受治疗的青少年运动员(14 - 18岁)进行了检查。主要自变量是损伤机制,分为:(1)接触(头对头、头对身体、头对球、头对地);(2)球员活动(进攻、防守、两者皆有);(3)意识机制(有意识、无意识)。结果包括急性症状严重程度、恢复学习时间、症状消退情况以及恢复比赛情况。使用单因素方差分析、独立t检验、多变量线性回归和Cox回归分析机制与结果之间的关联。

结果

在105名篮球运动员(16.2±1.4岁;50.5%为男性)中,头对地接触(n = 44/105;41.9%)最为常见。主动冲撞(n = 12/53;22.6%)是最常见的球员活动机制,进攻(n = 24/53;45.3%)和防守(n = 23/53;43.4%)活动的发生率相似。大多数人意识到即将发生碰撞(n = 37/46;80.4%)。与头对头(β = 0.33,P = 0.003)和头对地(β = 0.23,P = 0.050)接触相比,头对身体的脑震荡与更高的初始症状严重程度评分相关。球员活动和意识机制不是结果指标的显著预测因素。只有更高的初始症状评分与更长的恢复学习时间、症状消退时间和恢复比赛时间相关。

结论

在这项针对脑震荡高中篮球运动员的初步研究中,头对地是最常见的脑震荡机制,在进攻和防守活动中的发生率相似。尽管头对身体的接触会增加急性症状,但其他机制并不能预测恢复时间。鉴于篮球运动中脑震荡的信息有限,这项初步研究的结果可能有助于为关于篮球SRC机制的更大规模研究提供参考。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验