Zamanian Maryam, Irannejad Maziar, Abedi Iraj, Saeb Mohsen, Roayaei Mahnaz
Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Department of Electrical Engineering, Islamic Azad University Najafabad Branch, Najafabad, Iran.
Strahlenther Onkol. 2025 Mar;201(3):306-315. doi: 10.1007/s00066-024-02290-y. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
The hypothesis of changing network layers to increase the accuracy of dose distribution prediction, instead of expanding their dimensions, which requires complex calculations, has been considered in our study.
A total of 137 prostate cancer patients treated with the tomotherapy technique were categorized as 80% training and validating as well as 20% testing for the nested UNet and UNet architectures. Mean absolute error (MAE) was used to measure the dosimetry indices of dose-volume histograms (DVHs), and geometry indices, including the structural similarity index measure (SSIM), dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and Jaccard similarity coefficient (JSC), were used to evaluate the isodose volume (IV) similarity prediction. To verify a statistically significant difference, the two-way statistical Wilcoxon test was used at a level of 0.05 (p < 0.05).
Use of a nested UNet architecture reduced the predicted dose MAE in DVH indices. The MAE for planning target volume (PTV), bladder, rectum, and right and left femur were D = 1.11 ± 0.90; D = 2.27 ± 2.85, D = 0.84 ± 0.62; D = 1.47 ± 12.02, D = 0.77 ± 1.59; D = 0.65 ± 0.70, D = 0.96 ± 2.82; and D = 1.18 ± 6.65, D = 0.44 ± 1.13, respectively. Additionally, the greatest geometric similarity was observed in the mean SSIM for UNet and nested UNet (0.91 vs. 0.94, respectively).
The nested UNet network can be considered a suitable network due to its ability to improve the accuracy of dose distribution prediction compared to the UNet network in an acceptable time.
在我们的研究中,考虑了改变网络层以提高剂量分布预测准确性的假设,而不是扩大网络层维度,因为扩大维度需要复杂的计算。
将137例接受断层放射治疗技术治疗的前列腺癌患者分为80%用于训练和验证以及20%用于测试的嵌套式UNet和UNet架构。使用平均绝对误差(MAE)来测量剂量体积直方图(DVH)的剂量学指标,并使用包括结构相似性指数测量(SSIM)、骰子相似系数(DSC)和杰卡德相似系数(JSC)在内的几何指标来评估等剂量体积(IV)相似性预测。为了验证统计学上的显著差异,使用双向统计威尔科克森检验,显著性水平为0.05(p < 0.05)。
使用嵌套式UNet架构降低了DVH指标中预测剂量的MAE。计划靶区(PTV)、膀胱、直肠以及左右股骨的MAE分别为D = 1.11 ± 0.90;D = 2.27 ± 2.85,D = 0.84 ± 0.62;D = 1.47 ± 12.02,D = 0.