Lenz Alexander, Bahr Flora, Riedel Christoph, Wright Felicia, Sinn Martin, Zhang Shuo, Schuett Marion, Well Lennart, Adam Gerhard, von Kodolitsch Yskert, Schoennagel Bjoern P, Bannas Peter
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Clinical Science Department, Imaging Systems, Philips GmbH Market DACH, Hamburg, Germany.
Eur Radiol. 2025 Apr;35(4):2200-2212. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11034-6. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
4D flow MRI-derived variables from Marfan patients are highly heterogeneous. Our aim was to identify distinct Marfan patient subgroups based on aortic 4D flow MRI and Z-score for stratification of distinct hemodynamic profiles and clinical features by means of hierarchical cluster analysis.
One hundred Marfan patients underwent baseline aortic 4D flow MRI at 3 T. Z-scores, degree of helical and vortical flow, wall shear stress, flow displacement, and peak velocity were determined in the ascending aorta. Sex, age, BMI, antihypertensive medication, and dural ectasia were recorded. Hierarchical cluster analysis was performed using 4D flow MRI variables and Z-scores as input.
Cluster analysis resulted in three distinct clusters characterized by different Z-scores (mean ± SD); cluster 1: 0.4 ± 1.1 vs. cluster 2: 3.1 ± 1.1 vs. cluster 3: 3.6 ± 1.9. The three clusters delivered differences in helical and vortical flow patterns (global p = 0.003 and p < 0.001, respectively), wall shear stress (0.49 ± 0.11 vs. 0.44 ± 0.12 vs. 0.37 ± 0.09 N/m, global p < 0.001), flow displacement (0.11 ± 0.05 vs. 0.16 ± 0.08 vs. 0.15 ± 0.07, global p = 0.006), and peak velocity (76.3 ± 9.0 vs. 60.1 ± 7.3 vs. 56.0 ± 7.8 cm/s, global p < 0.001). Patients in cluster 1 and 2 were relevantly younger than in cluster 3 (32.3 ± 13.8 vs. 32.8 ± 12.6 vs. 40.2 ± 15.0 years, all pairwise ∆p < 0.0297).
Hierarchical cluster analysis based on aortic 4D flow MRI and Z-score revealed three distinct subgroups of Marfan patients, each characterized by specific hemodynamic profiles and clinical features. Follow-up of our patients is warranted to assess if 4D flow MRI- and Z-score-based stratification can predict future aortic diameter growth and ultimately improve outcomes.
A combination of Z-score and 4D flow MRI-derived parameters may help identify subgroups of Marfan patients representing different stages or phenotypes of aortic disease, which require specific management strategies.
Four-dimensional (4D) flow MRI-derived variables of Marfan patients are highly heterogeneous across varying Z-scores. Cluster analysis based on 4D flow MRI and Z-score revealed three distinct subgroups of Marfan patients. A combination of Z-score and 4D flow MRI-derived parameters may identify different stages of aortic disease in Marfan patients.
马凡综合征患者的4D流MRI衍生变量高度异质性。我们的目的是基于主动脉4D流MRI和Z评分,通过层次聚类分析识别不同的马凡综合征患者亚组,以对不同的血流动力学特征和临床特征进行分层。
100名马凡综合征患者在3T条件下接受了基线主动脉4D流MRI检查。测定升主动脉的Z评分、螺旋流和涡流程度、壁面剪应力、血流位移和峰值速度。记录性别、年龄、体重指数、抗高血压药物使用情况和硬脊膜膨出情况。使用4D流MRI变量和Z评分作为输入进行层次聚类分析。
聚类分析产生了三个不同的聚类,其特征是不同的Z评分(均值±标准差);聚类1:0.4±1.1,聚类2:3.1±1.1,聚类3:3.6±1.9。这三个聚类在螺旋流和涡流模式(全局p值分别为0.003和p<0.001)、壁面剪应力(0.49±0.11 vs. 0.44±0.12 vs. 0.37±0.09N/m,全局p<0.001)、血流位移(0.11±0.05 vs. 0.16±0.08 vs. 0.15±0.07,全局p=0.006)和峰值速度(76.3±9.0 vs. 60.1±7.3 vs. 56.0±7.8cm/s,全局p<0.001)方面存在差异。聚类1和2中的患者比聚类3中的患者明显年轻(32.3±13.8 vs. 32.8±12.6 vs. 40.2±15.0岁,所有两两比较的∆p<0.0297)。
基于主动脉4D流MRI和Z评分的层次聚类分析揭示了马凡综合征患者的三个不同亚组,每个亚组具有特定的血流动力学特征和临床特征。有必要对我们的患者进行随访,以评估基于4D流MRI和Z评分的分层是否能够预测未来主动脉直径的增长,并最终改善预后。
Z评分和4D流MRI衍生参数的组合可能有助于识别代表主动脉疾病不同阶段或表型的马凡综合征患者亚组,这些亚组需要特定的管理策略。
马凡综合征患者的四维(4D)流MRI衍生变量在不同的Z评分中高度异质性。基于4D流MRI和Z评分的聚类分析揭示了马凡综合征患者的三个不同亚组。Z评分和4D流MRI衍生参数的组合可能识别出马凡综合征患者主动脉疾病的不同阶段。