• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直接青霉素挑战的反应风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Reaction Risk to Direct Penicillin Challenges: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Division of Rheumatology. Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.

出版信息

JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Nov 1;184(11):1374-1383. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.4606.

DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.4606
PMID:39283610
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11406457/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

While direct penicillin challenges might support the expansion of penicillin allergy delabeling efforts, the perceived risk of reactions remains a key barrier.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the frequency of reactions to direct penicillin challenges in individuals with penicillin allergy labels and to identify factors associated with such reactions.

DATA SOURCES

Three electronic databases were searched (MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus) from inception to July 19, 2023, for primary studies assessing patients undergoing direct penicillin challenges. Articles were included regardless of publication year, language, status, or definition of allergy risk.

STUDY SELECTION

Two reviewers independently selected original studies reporting the frequency of immunologically mediated reactions following a direct penicillin challenge in patients reporting a penicillin allergy.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two reviewers independently extracted data and independently assessed the quality of each primary study using a risk-of-bias tool for prevalence studies.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was the frequency of reactions to direct penicillin challenges as calculated using random-effects bayesian meta-analysis of proportions. Secondary outcomes included risk factors for reactions and the frequency of severe reactions.

RESULTS

A total of 56 primary studies involving 9225 participants were included. Among participants, 438 experienced reactions to direct penicillin challenges without prior testing, corresponding to an overall meta-analytic frequency of 3.5% (95% credible interval [CrI], 2.5%-4.6%). Meta-regression analyses revealed that studies performed in North America had lower rates of reaction to direct challenges (odds ratio [OR], 0.36; 95% CrI, 0.20-0.61), while studies performed in children (OR, 3.37; 95% CrI, 1.98-5.98), in outpatients (OR, 2.19; 95% CrI, 1.08-4.75), and with a graded (OR, 3.24; 95% CrI, 1.50-7.06) or prolonged (OR, 5.45; 95% CrI, 2.38-13.28) challenge had higher rates of reaction. Only 5 severe reactions (3 anaphylaxis, 1 fever with rash, and 1 acute kidney injury) were reported, none of which were fatal.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This systematic review and meta-analysis found that reactions to direct penicillin challenges are infrequent, with rates comparable to indirect challenges after allergy testing. These findings suggest that direct challenges are safe for incorporation into penicillin allergy evaluation efforts across age groups and clinical settings.

摘要

重要性

虽然直接青霉素挑战可能支持扩大青霉素过敏标签去除工作,但人们对反应的担忧仍然是一个关键障碍。

目的

评估有青霉素过敏标签的个体中直接青霉素挑战的反应频率,并确定与这些反应相关的因素。

数据来源

从创建到 2023 年 7 月 19 日,三个电子数据库(MEDLINE、Web of Science 和 Scopus)都被搜索到,用于评估进行直接青霉素挑战的患者的主要研究。无论研究的出版年份、语言、状态或过敏风险定义如何,都包括了这些文章。

研究选择

两名审查员独立选择了报告报告青霉素过敏的患者在直接青霉素挑战后发生免疫介导反应频率的原始研究。

数据提取和综合

两名审查员独立提取数据,并使用患病率研究的偏倚风险工具独立评估每项原始研究的质量。

主要结果和措施

主要结果是使用随机效应贝叶斯荟萃分析比例计算的直接青霉素挑战反应的频率。次要结果包括反应的危险因素和严重反应的频率。

结果

共有 56 项涉及 9225 名参与者的主要研究被纳入。在参与者中,有 438 名在未经预先测试的情况下对直接青霉素挑战有反应,总体荟萃分析频率为 3.5%(95%可信区间[CrI],2.5%-4.6%)。元回归分析显示,在北美进行的研究中,直接挑战的反应率较低(比值比[OR],0.36;95% CrI,0.20-0.61),而在儿童(OR,3.37;95% CrI,1.98-5.98)、门诊患者(OR,2.19;95% CrI,1.08-4.75)和分级(OR,3.24;95% CrI,1.50-7.06)或延长(OR,5.45;95% CrI,2.38-13.28)挑战中,反应率更高。仅报告了 5 例严重反应(3 例过敏反应、1 例发热伴皮疹和 1 例急性肾损伤),均非致命。

结论和相关性

本系统评价和荟萃分析发现,直接青霉素挑战的反应并不常见,其发生率与过敏测试后的间接挑战相当。这些发现表明,直接挑战在各个年龄段和临床环境中纳入青霉素过敏评估工作是安全的。

相似文献

1
Reaction Risk to Direct Penicillin Challenges: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.直接青霉素挑战的反应风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Nov 1;184(11):1374-1383. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.4606.
2
Assessment of the Frequency of Dual Allergy to Penicillins and Cefazolin: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.评估青霉素和头孢唑林双重过敏的频率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Apr 1;156(4):e210021. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0021. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
A Closer Look at Penicillin Allergy History: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Tolerance to Drug Challenge.深入探讨青霉素过敏史:药物激发试验中耐受情况的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Med. 2020 Apr;133(4):452-462.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.09.017. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
5
Frequency of severe reactions following penicillin drug provocation tests: A Bayesian meta-analysis.青霉素药物激发试验后严重反应的发生率:一项贝叶斯荟萃分析。
Clin Transl Allergy. 2021 Jun;11(4):e12008. doi: 10.1002/clt2.12008.
6
Direct oral amoxicillin challenge without preliminary skin testing in adult patients with allergy and at low risk with reported penicillin allergy.在报告有青霉素过敏的成年过敏患者且低风险患者中,不进行初步皮肤试验直接口服阿莫西林激发试验。
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2019 Jan 1;40(1):57-61. doi: 10.2500/aap.2019.40.4184.
7
Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions aimed at delabeling low-risk penicillin allergies with consideration for sex and gender.针对考虑性别因素的旨在消除低危青霉素过敏标签的干预措施的系统评价和荟萃分析议定书。
Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 14;13(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02671-5.
8
Safe Penicillin Allergy Delabeling in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.安全去除初级保健中青霉素过敏标签:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2024 Sep;12(9):2415-2426.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.06.017. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
9
Penicillin Allergy Testing and Delabeling for Patients Who Are Prescribed Penicillin: A Systematic Review for a World Health Organization Guideline.青霉素过敏测试和标签去除在接受青霉素处方患者中的应用:世界卫生组织指南的系统评价。
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2024 Apr;66(2):223-240. doi: 10.1007/s12016-024-08988-2. Epub 2024 May 2.
10
Multicenter Australian Study to Determine Criteria for Low- and High-Risk Penicillin Testing in Outpatients.澳大利亚多中心研究以确定门诊患者青霉素低风险和高风险检测标准。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Feb;8(2):681-689.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.09.025. Epub 2019 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Clearance of penicillin allergies via direct oral provocation testing (DOPT): a systematic review.通过直接口服激发试验(DOPT)清除青霉素过敏:一项系统评价
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2025 Jul 31;5(1):e167. doi: 10.1017/ash.2025.10080. eCollection 2025.