• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过直接口服激发试验(DOPT)清除青霉素过敏:一项系统评价

Clearance of penicillin allergies via direct oral provocation testing (DOPT): a systematic review.

作者信息

Dore Michael, Otto Ashley, Wang Annie, Heintz Carly, Cantrell Sarah, Shields Daniel, Burkhart Allyson

机构信息

Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.

Durham Veteran's Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2025 Jul 31;5(1):e167. doi: 10.1017/ash.2025.10080. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1017/ash.2025.10080
PMID:40765629
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12322777/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Penicillin allergies are reported in 10-15% of the US population, but the actual rate is less than 1%. Inappropriate penicillin allergies are associated with adverse patient outcomes, poor antimicrobial stewardship, and increased healthcare costs. Direct oral provocation testing (DOPT) is a safe and cost-effective way to remove false penicillin allergy labels (PAL). However, widespread implementation is currently limited due to inadequate safety data and protocol variations. This systematic review evaluates the safety of single-dose, nongraded DOPT by the nonallergist.

DESIGN

Systematic review. MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to May 2025.

SETTING

Inpatient (Intensive care unit (ICU) and general medical ward) and outpatient.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults with self-reported penicillin allergies deemed low risk by a validated scoring system.

INTERVENTIONS

DOPT by nonallergists with single-dose oral amoxicillin 250 mg with a 60-minute observation period.

RESULTS

3 352 studies were identified, 15 were included in the analysis. Of the 1786 patients who completed DOPT, 66 (3.7%) experienced any reaction: 27 (1.5%) immediate rashes, 24 (1.3%) delayed rashes, and 15 (.8%) other reactions. No cases of anaphylaxis, angioedema, or epinephrine use were reported.

CONCLUSION

The use of single-dose DOPT in patients deemed low risk, using a validated risk scoring tool, is safe, with low rates of mild reactions and no serious adverse events. A nonallergist can significantly improve penicillin delabeling rates and patient outcomes using this approach.

摘要

目的

据报告,美国有10% - 15%的人口对青霉素过敏,但实际发生率低于1%。不恰当的青霉素过敏诊断与不良的患者预后、抗菌药物管理不善以及医疗成本增加有关。直接口服激发试验(DOPT)是一种安全且具有成本效益的方法,可去除错误的青霉素过敏标签(PAL)。然而,由于安全数据不足和方案差异,目前其广泛应用受到限制。本系统评价评估了非过敏专科医生进行单剂量、非分级DOPT的安全性。

设计

系统评价。检索了MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库,检索时间从建库至2025年5月。

地点

住院患者(重症监护病房(ICU)和普通内科病房)和门诊患者。

参与者

经有效评分系统判定为低风险的自我报告对青霉素过敏的成年人。

干预措施

非过敏专科医生进行DOPT,口服单剂量250mg阿莫西林,并观察60分钟。

结果

共识别出3352项研究,15项纳入分析。在1786例完成DOPT的患者中,66例(3.7%)出现任何反应:27例(1.5%)出现即刻皮疹,24例(1.3%)出现延迟皮疹,15例(0.8%)出现其他反应。未报告过敏反应、血管性水肿或使用肾上腺素的病例。

结论

使用经过验证的风险评分工具,对低风险患者采用单剂量DOPT是安全的,轻度反应发生率低,且无严重不良事件。非过敏专科医生采用这种方法可显著提高青霉素脱敏率和患者预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/feaa/12322777/04bd1418ef7c/S2732494X25100806_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/feaa/12322777/49c78cd87832/S2732494X25100806_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/feaa/12322777/667c0dc78fdb/S2732494X25100806_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/feaa/12322777/04bd1418ef7c/S2732494X25100806_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/feaa/12322777/49c78cd87832/S2732494X25100806_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/feaa/12322777/667c0dc78fdb/S2732494X25100806_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/feaa/12322777/04bd1418ef7c/S2732494X25100806_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Clearance of penicillin allergies via direct oral provocation testing (DOPT): a systematic review.通过直接口服激发试验(DOPT)清除青霉素过敏:一项系统评价
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2025 Jul 31;5(1):e167. doi: 10.1017/ash.2025.10080. eCollection 2025.
2
Different antibiotic treatments for group A streptococcal pharyngitis.不同的抗生素治疗方案用于治疗 A 组链球菌性咽炎。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 15;11(11):CD004406. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004406.pub6.
3
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
4
Treatments for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP): an overview of systematic reviews.慢性炎症性脱髓鞘性多发性神经根神经病(CIDP)的治疗:系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 13;1(1):CD010369. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010369.pub2.
5
Interventions for necrotizing soft tissue infections in adults.成人坏死性软组织感染的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 31;5(5):CD011680. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011680.pub2.
6
Antibiotics for exacerbations of asthma.用于哮喘加重期的抗生素
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 25;6(6):CD002741. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002741.pub2.
7
Sympathetic nerve blocks for persistent pain in adults with inoperable abdominopelvic cancer.成人无法手术的腹盆腔癌症持续性疼痛的交感神经阻滞。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 6;6(6):CD015229. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015229.pub2.
8
Topical versus systemic antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.用于慢性化脓性中耳炎的局部用抗生素与全身用抗生素对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 9;6(6):CD013053. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013053.pub3.
9
Interventions for infantile haemangiomas of the skin.皮肤婴儿血管瘤的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 18;4(4):CD006545. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006545.pub3.
10
Non-pharmacological interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised non-ICU patients.非 ICU 住院患者预防谵妄的非药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 19;7(7):CD013307. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013307.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Reaction Risk to Direct Penicillin Challenges: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.直接青霉素挑战的反应风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Nov 1;184(11):1374-1383. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.4606.
2
Long-Term Outcomes Associated With β-Lactam Allergies.β-内酰胺类过敏相关的长期结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2412313. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.12313.
3
Resource utilization and cost assessment of a proactive penicillin allergy de-labeling program for low-risk inpatients.针对低风险住院患者的主动青霉素过敏标签去除计划的资源利用和成本评估
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2024 Jan 22;20(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13223-023-00864-6.
4
Clearance of Penicillin Allergy Through Direct Oral Challenge by Primary Care Physicians.基层医疗医生通过直接口服激发试验清除青霉素过敏
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Dec;38(16):3651-3653. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08425-8. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
5
Efficacy of a Clinical Decision Rule to Enable Direct Oral Challenge in Patients With Low-Risk Penicillin Allergy: The PALACE Randomized Clinical Trial.临床决策规则在低风险青霉素过敏患者中直接口服激发试验的疗效:PALACE 随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Sep 1;183(9):944-952. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.2986.
6
Outcomes of penicillin allergy delabeling by nonallergy specialists at an academic medical center.学术医疗中心非过敏专科医生进行青霉素过敏标签去除的结果。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 Feb;11(2):650-651.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.10.055. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
7
The effectiveness of interventions that support penicillin allergy assessment and delabeling of adult and pediatric patients by nonallergy specialists: a systematic review and meta-analysis.非过敏专科医生支持青霉素过敏评估和重新标记成人和儿科患者的干预措施的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Infect Dis. 2023 Apr;129:152-161. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.11.026. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
8
Drug allergy: A 2022 practice parameter update.药物过敏:2022年实践参数更新
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022 Dec;150(6):1333-1393. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.08.028. Epub 2022 Sep 17.
9
Risk-stratified management to remove low-risk penicillin allergy labels in the patients with COVID-19 in the intensive care unit.在重症监护病房对新冠肺炎患者进行风险分层管理以去除低风险青霉素过敏标签。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 Feb;11(2):632-635. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.08.043. Epub 2022 Sep 11.
10
Direct oral penicillin challenge for penicillin allergy delabeling as a health services intervention: A multicenter cohort study.将直接口服青霉素激发试验用于青霉素过敏标签去除作为一种卫生服务干预措施:一项多中心队列研究。
Allergy. 2022 Mar;77(3):1038-1042. doi: 10.1111/all.15169. Epub 2021 Nov 10.