Cabouat Anne-Flore, He Tingying, Isenberg Petra, Isenberg Tobias
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2025 Jan;31(1):1083-1093. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2024.3456318. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
We developed and validated an instrument to measure the perceived readability in data visualization: PREVis. Researchers and practitioners can easily use this instrument as part of their evaluations to compare the perceived readability of different visual data representations. Our instrument can complement results from controlled experiments on user task performance or provide additional data during in-depth qualitative work such as design iterations when developing a new technique. Although readability is recognized as an essential quality of data visualizations, so far there has not been a unified definition of the construct in the context of visual representations. As a result, researchers often lack guidance for determining how to ask people to rate their perceived readability of a visualization. To address this issue, we engaged in a rigorous process to develop the first validated instrument targeted at the subjective readability of visual data representations. Our final instrument consists of 11 items across 4 dimensions: understandability, layout clarity, readability of data values, and readability of data patterns. We provide the questionnaire as a document with implementation guidelines on osf.io/9cg8j. Beyond this instrument, we contribute a discussion of how researchers have previously assessed visualization readability, and an analysis of the factors underlying perceived readability in visual data representations.
PREVis。研究人员和从业者可以轻松地将此工具用作评估的一部分,以比较不同视觉数据表示形式的感知可读性。我们的工具可以补充关于用户任务绩效的对照实验结果,或者在诸如开发新技术时的设计迭代等深入定性工作期间提供额外的数据。尽管可读性被认为是数据可视化的一项基本质量,但到目前为止,在视觉表示的背景下,对于这一概念尚无统一的定义。因此,研究人员在确定如何要求人们对可视化的感知可读性进行评分时往往缺乏指导。为了解决这个问题,我们进行了一个严格的过程,以开发首个针对视觉数据表示的主观可读性的经过验证的工具。我们的最终工具由4个维度的11个项目组成:可理解性、布局清晰度、数据值的可读性和数据模式的可读性。我们将该问卷作为一份文件提供,并在osf.io/9cg8j上提供了实施指南。除了这个工具之外,我们还对研究人员此前如何评估可视化可读性进行了讨论,并对视觉数据表示中感知可读性的潜在因素进行了分析。